Todd Mattox v. Adam Edelman, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: it is ORDERED that the dismissal of Plaintiff s claims against Adrianne Neff, P.A. is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal of Plaintiff s claims against Drs. Pandya, Jordan, and Borgerding are REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 16-1412 Document: 29-3 Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1412 TODD MATTOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, FILED Mar 15, 2017 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. ADAM EDELMAN, M.D.; CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Defendants, ADRIANNE NEFF, P.A.; HARESH PANDYA, M.D.; KENNETH JORDAN, M.D.; WILLIAM BORGERDING, D.O., Defendants - Appellees. Before: MERRITT, CLAY, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Adrianne Neff, P.A. is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Drs. Pandya, Jordan, and Borgerding are REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?