Paul Torres v. Catherine S. Bauman


OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to allow consideration of Torres s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining without application of the deferential framework imposed by 28 U.S.C. 2254(d), decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Eugene E. Siler , Jr. (AUTHORING) and Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 16-1728 Document: 26-1 Filed: 02/24/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: February 24, 2017 Mr. Linus Richard Banghart-Linn Office of the Attorney General of Michigan P.O. Box 30217 Lansing, MI 48116 Ms. Charlotte Hemenway Taylor Jones Day 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Re: Case No. 16-1728, Paul Torres v. Catherine S. Bauman Originating Case No. : 2:14-cv-12331 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Jeanine R. Hance Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037 cc: Mr. Shay Dvoretzky Mr. David H. Goodkin Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?