Paul Torres v. Catherine S. Bauman
Filing
OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to allow consideration of Torres s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining without application of the deferential framework imposed by 28 U.S.C. 2254(d), decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Eugene E. Siler , Jr. (AUTHORING) and Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judges.
Case: 16-1728
Document: 26-1
Filed: 02/24/2017
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: February 24, 2017
Mr. Linus Richard Banghart-Linn
Office of the Attorney General
of Michigan
P.O. Box 30217
Lansing, MI 48116
Ms. Charlotte Hemenway Taylor
Jones Day
51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
Re: Case No. 16-1728, Paul Torres v. Catherine S. Bauman
Originating Case No. : 2:14-cv-12331
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Jeanine R. Hance
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037
cc: Mr. Shay Dvoretzky
Mr. David H. Goodkin
Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?