USA v. Michael Schwartz


OPINION filed: The district court correctly applied the two-level enhancement whether based on perjury or destruction of evidence, and reasonably sentenced defendant accordingly, We AFFIRM, decision not for publication. Ralph B. Guy, Jr. (authoring), John M. Rogers, and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 16-1895 Document: 38-1 Filed: 06/21/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: June 21, 2017 Mr. Gregory A. Napolitano Laufman & Napolitano 4310 Hunt Road Cincinnati, OH 45242 Ms. Alexis M. Sanford Ms. Tessa K. Hessmiller Office of the U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 208 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 Re: Case No. 16-1895, USA v. Michael Schwartz Originating Case No. : 1:15-cr-00155-1 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Renee M. Jefferies Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021 cc: Mr. Thomas Dorwin Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?