Teron Harris v. USA


OPINION filed: Were we now to rule upon Harris s motion to vacate his sentence, we would be forced to dismiss the matter for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2255(f) s one-year period for filing such a motion. Rather than do so, only to have Harris later seek authorization to file a second or successive 2255 motion, we elect to hold Harris s appeal from the denial of his 2255 motion in abeyance, pending the Supreme Court s issuance of a decision in Beckles; decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey (authoring), Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 16-3332 Document: 20-2 Filed: 12/08/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: December 8, 2016 Ms. Catherine Jean Adinaro Federal Public Defender's Office 1660 W. Second Street Suite 750 Cleveland, OH 44113 Mr. Daniel R. Hurley Office of the U.S. Attorney c/o FBI P.O. Box 7755 Ann Arbor, MI 48107 Re: Case No. 16-3332, Teron Harris v. USA Originating Case No. : 3:16-cv-00402 : 3:13-cr-00367-1 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Renee M. Jefferies Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021 cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?