Teron Harris v. USA

Filing

OPINION filed: Were we now to rule upon Harris s motion to vacate his sentence, we would be forced to dismiss the matter for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2255(f) s one-year period for filing such a motion. Rather than do so, only to have Harris later seek authorization to file a second or successive 2255 motion, we elect to hold Harris s appeal from the denial of his 2255 motion in abeyance, pending the Supreme Court s issuance of a decision in Beckles; decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey (authoring), Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge.

Case: 16-3332

Document: 20-2

Filed: 12/08/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: December 8, 2016

Ms. Catherine Jean Adinaro
Federal Public Defender's Office
1660 W. Second Street
Suite 750
Cleveland, OH 44113
Mr. Daniel R. Hurley
Office of the U.S. Attorney
c/o FBI
P.O. Box 7755
Ann Arbor, MI 48107
Re: Case No. 16-3332, Teron Harris v. USA
Originating Case No. : 3:16-cv-00402 : 3:13-cr-00367-1
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Renee M. Jefferies
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021
cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith
Enclosure