Teron Harris v. USA
Filing
AMENDED OPINION filed: In its decision in Beckles, the Supreme Court made clear that the residual clause found in the prior version of USSG 4B1.2(a) is not subject to void-for-vagueness challenges in the same way as is the residual clause of the ACCA. Consequently, Harris cannot rely on the 2015 ruling in Johnson to extend the one-year period for filing his 2255 motion challenging his 60-month prison sentence. We thus conclude that Harris s 2255 motion was untimely and AFFIRM the district court s denial of that motion, decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey (authoring), Eric L. Clay, and Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judges.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.