William Farley v. Eaton Corporation


OPINION filed : Given the extreme deference we must give the arbitrator's decision, we conclude that the arbitrator did not exceed his power in interpreting the indemnification clause. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Alice M. Batchelder and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 16-3893 Document: 41-1 Filed: 07/20/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: July 20, 2017 Mr. Vincent Atriano Squire Patton Boggs 41 S. High Street, Suite 2000 Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Arthur Michael Kaufman Kaufman, Drozdowski & Grendell 29525 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 250 Pepper Pike, OH 44122 Mr. Bernard J. Nussbaum Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Floor New York, NY 10020-1089 Re: Case No. 16-3893, William Farley v. Eaton Corporation Originating Case No. : 1:16-cv-00690 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Robin L. Johnson Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039 cc: Ms. Sandy Opacich Enclosure Mandate to issue Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?