William Farley v. Eaton Corporation
Filing
OPINION filed : Given the extreme deference we must give the arbitrator's decision, we conclude that the arbitrator did not exceed his power in interpreting the indemnification clause. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Alice M. Batchelder and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.
<![CDATA[
Case: 16-3893
Document: 41-1
Filed: 07/20/2017
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Filed: July 20, 2017
Mr. Vincent Atriano
Squire Patton Boggs
41 S. High Street, Suite 2000
Columbus, OH 43215
Mr. Arthur Michael Kaufman
Kaufman, Drozdowski & Grendell
29525 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 250
Pepper Pike, OH 44122
Mr. Bernard J. Nussbaum
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
1221 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Floor
New York, NY 10020-1089
Re: Case No. 16-3893, William Farley v. Eaton Corporation
Originating Case No. : 1:16-cv-00690
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Robin L. Johnson
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039
cc: Ms. Sandy Opacich
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
