GGNSC Louisville Mt. Holly, L, et al v. Leslie Mohamed-vall

Filing

OPINION filed: GGNSC's motion to dismiss the appeal [5555601-2] is GRANTED. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Helene N. White, and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 16-5606

Document: 37-2

Filed: 06/02/2017

Page: 1

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 17a0307n.06
No. 16-5606

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
GGNSC LOUISVILLE MT. HOLLY, LLC d/b/a
GOLDEN LIVING CENTER – MT. HOLLY;
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL SENIOR CARE,
LLC; GGNSC ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
LLC; GGNSC HOLDINGS, LLC; GGNSC EQUITY
HOLDINGS, LLD; GOLDEN GATE ANCILLARY,
LLD; GGNSC CLINICAL SERVICES, LLC; AND
GPH LOUISVILLE MT. HOLLY, LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellees,
v.
LESLIE GUESS MOHAMED-VALL,
ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
BETTYE J. GUESS, DECEASED,
Defendants-Appellant.

BEFORE:

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

FILED
Jun 02, 2017
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, WHITE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Defendant Leslie Guess Mohamed-Vall appeals the order
compelling arbitration of her claims, enjoining her from litigating the claims in state court, and
staying the underlying action pending arbitration. GGNSC moves to dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction, and Mohamed-Vall opposes the motion to dismiss.

We held this case in

abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. P’ship v.
Clark, 137 S. Ct. 1421, 1426–27 (2017) (invalidating Kentucky’s refusal to enforce arbitration
agreements entered into by attorneys-in-fact absent a clear statement granting this authority in
the power of attorney).

Case: 16-5606

Document: 37-2

Filed: 06/02/2017

Page: 2

No. 16-5606
GGNSC Louisville Mt. Holly, LLC v. Mohamed-Vall
Under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), an immediate appeal may be taken from “a
final decision with respect to arbitration[.]” 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(3). But, except as provided in
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order that grants a stay of
an action under 9 U.S.C. § 3 or that directs arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 4. 9 U.S.C. § 16(b)(1),
(2). GGNSC asserts that no final decision with respect to arbitration has been entered, and thus
§ 16(b)’s prohibition against an appeal is controlling. Although Mohamed-Vall argues that the
district court entered a final judgment with respect to arbitration that is immediately appealable,
the FAA permits an appeal from an order compelling arbitration only when it is entered in
connection with the dismissal of the underlying action. Preferred Care of Delaware, Inc. v.
Estate of Hopkins, 845 F.3d 765, 768–69 (6th Cir. 2017); ATAC Corp. v. Arthur Treacher’s Inc.,
280 F.3d 1091, 1097–99 (6th Cir. 2002). The underlying action here has not been dismissed.
Mohamed-Vall also asserts that the order prohibiting her from litigating her claims in
state court is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) and that this court should exercise pendant
appellate jurisdiction over the arbitration orders. GGNSC argues that the grant of injunctive
relief is merely a mechanism to enforce the order compelling arbitration and that the more
specific appellate review provisions of the FAA control over § 1292(a)(1), which is a general
statute governing appellate jurisdiction. See Preferred Care of Delaware, 845 F.3d at 769; see
also Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 384 (1992) (“[I]t is a commonplace of
statutory construction that the specific governs the general[.]”).
We lack jurisdiction to review the order compelling arbitration and staying the action. We
agree that the grant of injunctive relief prohibiting Mohamed-Vall from litigating her claims in
state court is merely a mechanism to enforce the order compelling arbitration and was proper

-2-

Case: 16-5606

Document: 37-2

Filed: 06/02/2017

Page: 3

No. 16-5606
GGNSC Louisville Mt. Holly, LLC v. Mohamed-Vall
under the Anti-Injunction Act 28 U. S. C. §2283; there is no reason to consider the exercise of
pendant jurisdiction.
GGNSC’s motion to dismiss this appeal is GRANTED.

-3-