Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Jeffrey S. Sutton, (CONCURRING IN PART & DISSENTING IN PART), and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges. *Information associated with aty Sanders has been revised--[Edited 04/21/2017 by CL].

Download PDF
Case: 16-5614 Document: 32-3 Filed: 04/20/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 16-5614 GLORIA MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, FILED Apr 20, 2017 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. THE RAWLINGS COMPANY LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Before: MOORE, SUTTON, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?