Alan Howard, Sr., et al v. Knox County, Tennessee, et al

Filing

OPINION : the district court's order denying Wiegenstein's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim on the basis of qualified immunity, is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Authoring Circuit Judge and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge.

Case: 16-6629

Document: 30-1

Filed: 06/21/2017

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: June 21, 2017

Mr. David Scott Bennett
Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan
200 W. Martin Luther King Boulevad
Suite 500
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2566
Mr. Jon Michael Cope
Stokes, Williams, Sharp, Cope & Mann
921 Volunteer Landing Lane
Suite 100
Knoxville, TN 37915
Re: Case No. 16-6629, Alan Howard, Sr., et al v. Knox County, Tennessee, et al
Originating Case No. : 3:15-cv-00006 : 3:15-cv-00098
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Laura A. Jones
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023
cc: Ms. Mary Christine DeCamp
Ms. Debra Poplin
Enclosure
Mandate to issue