Alan Howard, Sr., et al v. Knox County, Tennessee, et al


OPINION : the district court's order denying Wiegenstein's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim on the basis of qualified immunity, is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Authoring Circuit Judge and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 16-6629 Document: 30-1 Filed: 06/21/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: June 21, 2017 Mr. David Scott Bennett Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan 200 W. Martin Luther King Boulevad Suite 500 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2566 Mr. Jon Michael Cope Stokes, Williams, Sharp, Cope & Mann 921 Volunteer Landing Lane Suite 100 Knoxville, TN 37915 Re: Case No. 16-6629, Alan Howard, Sr., et al v. Knox County, Tennessee, et al Originating Case No. : 3:15-cv-00006 : 3:15-cv-00098 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Ms. Mary Christine DeCamp Ms. Debra Poplin Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?