United States v. Elain Young
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Lavenski R. Smith and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Lavenski R. Smith (PUBLISHED), CONCUR BY: Jane Kelly [4157083] [12-2527, 12-2593]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
May 23, 2014
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-2527 United States v. Elain Young
12-2593 United States v. Katherine Mock
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant Young was
Jennifer Herndon, of Florissant, MO. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the
appellant Mock was Kevin Christopher Curran of St. Louis, MO. The following attorney(s)
appeared on the appellant Young’s brief; Jennifer Herndon, of Florissant, MO and Michael J.
Gorla, of St. Louis, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant Mock’s brief;
Kevin Christopher Curran of St. Louis, MO.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Thomas Dittmeier,
AUSA, of Saint Louis, MO. In addition to Mr. Dittmeier, the following attorney(s) appeared on
the appellee’s brief; Patrick T. Judge, AUSA, of Saint Louis, MO., and Michael A. Reilly,
AUSA, of Saint Louis, MO.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Henry E. Autrey. The
judgment of the district court was entered on June 18, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LMT
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 12-2527
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Entry ID: 4157083
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:09-cr-00679-HEA-2
4:09-cr-00679-HEA-1
Appellate Case: 12-2527
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Entry ID: 4157083
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?