United States v. Carlous Horton
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Duane Benton, C. Arlen Beam and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [4136518] [12-3627, 12-3628]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
March 24, 2014
Mr. Robert Allen Ratliff
713 Dauphin Street
Mobile, AL 36602
Mr. F. A White Jr.
7924 N. Cherry Street
Kansas City, MO 64118
RE: 12-3627 United States v. Carlous Horton
12-3628 United States v. Christopher Holmes
Dear Counsel:
The court has issued an opinion in these cases. Judgments have been entered in
accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today.
Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period
for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any
petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day
period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
SRD
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. Christopher M. Holmes
Mr. Carlous S. Horton
Ms. Cynthia Jean Hyde
Mr. Gary K. Milligan
Ms. Ann Thompson
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 6:11-cr-03021-RED
Appellate Case: 12-3627
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/24/2014 Entry ID: 4136518
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?