United States v. Carlous Horton


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Duane Benton, C. Arlen Beam and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [4136518] [12-3627, 12-3628]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court March 24, 2014 Mr. Robert Allen Ratliff 713 Dauphin Street Mobile, AL 36602 Mr. F. A White Jr. 7924 N. Cherry Street Kansas City, MO 64118 RE: 12-3627 United States v. Carlous Horton 12-3628 United States v. Christopher Holmes Dear Counsel: The court has issued an opinion in these cases. Judgments have been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Christopher M. Holmes Mr. Carlous S. Horton Ms. Cynthia Jean Hyde Mr. Gary K. Milligan Ms. Ann Thompson District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 6:11-cr-03021-RED Appellate Case: 12-3627 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2014 Entry ID: 4136518

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?