Angela Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Steven M. Colloton and Raymond W. Gruender AUTHORING JUDGE:Roger L. Wollman (PUBLISHED) [4169238] [12-3780]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
June 26, 2014
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 12-3780 Angela Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co, et al
Dear Sirs:
The petition for rehearing by the panel was granted in part. The original
opinion of 3/13/14 was withdrawn and an opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who represented the appellant was Brooke Timmer, of
Urbandale, IA., Emily E. McCarty of Urbandale, IA.
Counsel who represented the appellee was Kerrie Marie Murphy, of West Des
Moines, IA., Julie Tomka Bittner, of West Des Moines, IA., Louis B. Butler, of
Milwaukee, WI., Dinita L. James of Phoenix, AZ.
The following attorney(s) appeared on the amicus brief, EEOC; Eric A.
Harrington, of Washington, DC. The following attorney(s) appeared on the amicus
brief, American Civil Liberties Union, et al. in support of appellant’s petition for
rehearing, Galen Sherwin of New York, NY, Lenora Lapidus of New York, NY, Rita
Bettis of Des Moines IA, and Randall Wilson of Des Moines, IA.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Robert W. Pratt. The
judgment of the district court was entered on October 23, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
YML
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:11-cv-00359-RP
Appellate Case: 12-3780
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/26/2014 Entry ID: 4169238
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?