Kevin Walking Eagle v. United State
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Myron H. Bright and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Myron H. Bright (PUBLISHED) [4123996] [13-1030] Chief Judge Riley concurs in all of the opinion except for footnote 2 on page 7.
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
February 14, 2014
Ms. Sarah Elizabeth Baron Houy
BANGS & MCCULLEN
333 West Boulevard
P.O. Box 2670
Rapid City, SD 57709-0000
RE: 13-1030 Kevin Walking Eagle v. United States
Dear Counsel:
The court today issued an opinion in this case. Judgment in accordance with the opinion
was also entered today. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold
the opinion in confidence until that time.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period
for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any
petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day
period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LMT
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. Joseph A. Haas
Mr. Eric D. Kelderman
Mr. Kevin Koliner
Mr. Kevin Walking Eagle
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 5:11-cv-05016-KES
Appellate Case: 13-1030
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/14/2014 Entry ID: 4123996
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?