Kevin Walking Eagle v. United State


OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Myron H. Bright and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Myron H. Bright (PUBLISHED) [4123996] [13-1030] Chief Judge Riley concurs in all of the opinion except for footnote 2 on page 7.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court February 14, 2014 Ms. Sarah Elizabeth Baron Houy BANGS & MCCULLEN 333 West Boulevard P.O. Box 2670 Rapid City, SD 57709-0000 RE: 13-1030 Kevin Walking Eagle v. United States Dear Counsel: The court today issued an opinion in this case. Judgment in accordance with the opinion was also entered today. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court LMT Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Joseph A. Haas Mr. Eric D. Kelderman Mr. Kevin Koliner Mr. Kevin Walking Eagle District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 5:11-cv-05016-KES Appellate Case: 13-1030 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2014 Entry ID: 4123996

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?