Richard Brown v. Susan Brown-Thill
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, James B. Loken and Kermit E. Bye AUTHORING JUDGE:James B. Loken (PUBLISHED); Denying [4121203-2] motion take judicial notice filed by Mr. Philip J. Loree, Jr. [4184449] [13-1708, 13-1710, 13-1797, 13-1795]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
August 11, 2014
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 13-1708
13-1710
13-1795
13-1797
Richard Brown v. Susan Brown-Thill
Susan Brown-Thill v. Richard Brown
Richard Brown v. Susan Brown-Thill
Susan Brown-Thill v. Richard Brown
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant/cross-appellee Susan BrownThill was George Barton, of Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the
appellant/cross-appellee brief was Stacy Ann Burrows, of Kansas City, MO.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee/cross-appellant Richard L.
Brown was Philip J. Loree, Jr., of Manhasset, NY. The following attorney(s) appeared on the
appellee brief; Joel B. Laner, of Kansas City, MO.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Scott O. Wright. The
judgments of the district court were entered on March 8, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
YML
Appellate Case: 13-1708
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Entry ID: 4184449
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:11-mc-09006-SOW
4:11-cv-01245-SOW
4:11-mc-09006-SOW
4:11-cv-01245-SOW
Appellate Case: 13-1708
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Entry ID: 4184449
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?