Hallmark Cards v. Monitor Clipper Partner
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Kermit E. Bye and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Roger L. Wollman (PUBLISHED) [4175187] [13-1905]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
July 15, 2014
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 13-1905 Hallmark Cards v. Monitor Clipper Partners
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Linda T. Coberly, of
Chicago, IL. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; David Field Oliver,
of Kansas City, MO., Stacey R. Gilman, of Kansas City, MO., Laura K Brooks, of Kansas
City, MO., Steven L. Manchel, of Newton, MA., Brook R. Long, of Chicago, IL., Michael
David Bess, of Chicago, IL.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was John C. Aisenbrey, of
Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; Charles W.
German, of Kansas City, MO., George Verschelden, of Kansas City, MO., Daniel E. Blegen,
of Kansas City, MO., Jeremy Suhr, of Kansas City, MO., Christina D. Arnone, of Kansas City,
MO.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Ortrie D. Smith. The
judgment of the district court was entered on March 20, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
YML
Enclosure(s)
cc: Lois Law
MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 13-1905
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/15/2014 Entry ID: 4175187
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:08-cv-00840-ODS
Appellate Case: 13-1905
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/15/2014 Entry ID: 4175187
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?