Hallmark Cards v. Monitor Clipper Partner

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, Kermit E. Bye and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Roger L. Wollman (PUBLISHED) [4175187] [13-1905]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court July 15, 2014 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 13-1905 Hallmark Cards v. Monitor Clipper Partners Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Linda T. Coberly, of Chicago, IL. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; David Field Oliver, of Kansas City, MO., Stacey R. Gilman, of Kansas City, MO., Laura K Brooks, of Kansas City, MO., Steven L. Manchel, of Newton, MA., Brook R. Long, of Chicago, IL., Michael David Bess, of Chicago, IL. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was John C. Aisenbrey, of Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief; Charles W. German, of Kansas City, MO., George Verschelden, of Kansas City, MO., Daniel E. Blegen, of Kansas City, MO., Jeremy Suhr, of Kansas City, MO., Christina D. Arnone, of Kansas City, MO. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Ortrie D. Smith. The judgment of the district court was entered on March 20, 2013. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court YML Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly Appellate Case: 13-1905 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2014 Entry ID: 4175187 District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:08-cv-00840-ODS Appellate Case: 13-1905 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2014 Entry ID: 4175187

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?