Alexander Mansfield v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Kermit E. Bye, Bobby E. Shepherd and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4239572] [13-2876]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-2876 ___________________________ Alexander J.C. Mansfield lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: November 12, 2014 Filed: January 30, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Alexander J.C. Mansfield petitions for review of an order entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge's determination that Mansfield was ineligible for waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) because he committed an aggravated felony. Mansfield initially entered the United States on a non-immigrant visa. He later adjusted his status to lawful permanent Appellate Case: 13-2876 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2015 Entry ID: 4239572 resident (LPR). Mansfield argues the aggravated felony bar to waiver of inadmissibility under § 1182(h) only applies to aliens who initially enter the United States as LPRs. Mansfield's argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See Roberts v. Holder, 745 F.3d 928, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2014) (concluding § 1182(h) is ambiguous with respect to whether it applies to aliens who only obtain LPR status after their initial entry into the United States, and deferring to the BIA's determination that the statute applies to persons such as Mansfield). "One panel may not overrule another." United States v. Reynolds, 116 F.3d 328, 329 (8th Cir. 1997). We therefore deny the petition for review. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 13-2876 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2015 Entry ID: 4239572

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?