Sherman Meirovitz v. Anthony Hayne


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Pasco M. Bowman and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED) [4176145] [13-3726]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3726 ___________________________ Sherman Ray Meirovitz lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI - Forrest City lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________ Submitted: July 14, 2014 Filed: July 17, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 13-3726 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Entry ID: 4176145 Sherman Meirovitz appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he raised the same claim that was rejected by this court in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See Meirovitz v. United States, 688 F.3d 369, 37072 (8th Cir. 2012). After careful review, we agree with the district court that Meirovitz did not show the section 2255 remedy was inadequate or ineffective. See Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Appellate Case: 13-3726 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Entry ID: 4176145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?