Bradley Baumann, et al v. Vladimir Zhukov, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Kermit E. Bye and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:James B. Loken (PUBLISHED), DISSENT BY: Kermit E. Bye [4321858] [14-2981]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court October 01, 2015 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 14-2981 Bradley Baumann, et al v. Vladimir Zhukov, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant and appeared on the brief was James H. Chalat, of Denver, CO. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee Long Haul Trucking, Inc. was Michael B. Langford, of Indianapolis, IN. The following attorney also appeared on the appellee brief of Long Haul Trucking Inc.; R. Jay Taylor, Jr., of Indianapolis, IN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of appellees Vladimir Zhukov, Swift-Truck Lines, LTD., and MTR Express, Inc. was Krista M. Carlson, of Lincoln, NE. The following attorneys also appeared on the appellee brief of Vladimir Zhukov, Swift-Truck Lines, LTD., and MTR Express, Inc.; Stephen L. Ahl, of Lincoln, NE., Erin C. Duggan Pemberton, of Lincoln, NE. The magistrate judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable F. A. Gossett, III. The judgment of the district court was entered on August 6, 2014. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court AMT Enclosure(s) cc: Lois Law MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 8:12-cv-00383-FG3 Appellate Case: 14-2981 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2015 Entry ID: 4321858

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?