Eric Wong v. Minnesota DHS, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Roger L. Wollman, C. Arlen Beam and Raymond W. Gruender AUTHORING JUDGE:Raymond W. Gruender (PUBLISHED), CONCUR AND DISSENT BY: C. ARLEN BEAM [4389593] [14-3415]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court April 19, 2016 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 14-3415 Eric Wong v. Minnesota DHS, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above case. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Paul R. Hansmeier, of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellant brief; Paul R. Hansmeier, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee Hennepin County was Daniel Kaczor, of Minneapolis, MN. Also appearing on Hennepin County’s brief was Toni A. Beitz of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of appellee Minnesota Department of Human Services and appellee Jesson was Patricia A. Sonnenberg, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN. Also appearing on MN DHS and Jesson’s brief was Scott Hiromi Ikeda, AAG, of Saint Paul, MN The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Donovan W. Frank. The judgment of the district court was entered on September 29, 2014. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court CMD Enclosure(s) cc: MO Lawyers Weekly Appellate Case: 14-3415 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2016 Entry ID: 4389593 District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:13-cv-03378-DWF Appellate Case: 14-3415 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2016 Entry ID: 4389593

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?