Automated Matching Systems v. U.S. Securities and Exchange, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Bobby E. Shepherd, C. Arlen Beam and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED); Denying [4292223-2] petition for review filed by Petitioner Automated Matching Systems Exchnge, LLC. in 15-2448; Denying [4339708-2] motion to supplement record filed by Mr. Michael Andrew Stegawski and Appellant Automated Matching Systems Exchnge, LLC., Denying [4366692-2] second motion to supplement record filed by Mr. Michael Andrew Stegawski. [4414302] [14-3698, 15-2448]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court June 20, 2016 West Publishing Opinions Clerk 610 Opperman Drive Building D D4-40 Eagan, MN 55123-0000 RE: 14-3698 Automated Matching Systems v. U.S. Securities and Exchange, et al 15-2448 Automated Matching Systems v. SEC, et al Dear Sirs: A published opinion was filed today in the above cases. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Michael Andrew Stegawski, of Sioux Falls, SD. The following attorney also appeared on the appellant brief; Richard F Rahn, of Sioux Falls, SD. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was William Kenneth Shirey, SEC, of Washington, DC. The following attorney also appeared on the appellee brief; Paul G. Alvarez, SEC, of Washington, DC. The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Karen E. Schreier. The judgment of the district court was entered on November 19, 2014. If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court AMT Enclosure(s) cc: MO Lawyers Weekly District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:14-cv-04095-KES Release No.34-75157 File No. 10-214 Appellate Case: 14-3698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2016 Entry ID: 4414302

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?