Automated Matching Systems v. U.S. Securities and Exchange, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Bobby E. Shepherd, C. Arlen Beam and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED); Denying [4292223-2] petition for review filed by Petitioner Automated Matching Systems Exchnge, LLC. in 15-2448; Denying [4339708-2] motion to supplement record filed by Mr. Michael Andrew Stegawski and Appellant Automated Matching Systems Exchnge, LLC., Denying [4366692-2] second motion to supplement record filed by Mr. Michael Andrew Stegawski. [4414302] [14-3698, 15-2448]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
June 20, 2016
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 14-3698 Automated Matching Systems v. U.S. Securities and Exchange, et al
15-2448 Automated Matching Systems v. SEC, et al
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was
Michael Andrew Stegawski, of Sioux Falls, SD. The following attorney also appeared on the
appellant brief; Richard F Rahn, of Sioux Falls, SD.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was William Kenneth Shirey,
SEC, of Washington, DC. The following attorney also appeared on the appellee brief; Paul G.
Alvarez, SEC, of Washington, DC.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Karen E. Schreier. The
judgment of the district court was entered on November 19, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
AMT
Enclosure(s)
cc: MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:14-cv-04095-KES
Release No.34-75157 File No. 10-214
Appellate Case: 14-3698
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/20/2016 Entry ID: 4414302
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?