Continental Casualty Company v. The Valspar Corporation
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Lavenski R. Smith and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:William Jay Riley (PUBLISHED) [4364895] [15-1547, 15-1623]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
February 09, 2016
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 15-1547 Continental Casualty Company v. The Valspar Corporation
15-1623 Continental Casualty Company v. National Union Fire Insurance
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above cases.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of Appellant Valspar was
Andrew J. Detherage, of Indianapolis, IN. The following attorneys also appeared on this
brief; Christopher L. Lynch, of Minneapolis, MN., L. Rachel Lerman, of Los Angeles, CA., and
John P. Fischer, Jr., of Indianapolis, IN.
Counsel for Appellant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA waived
oral argument. The following attorneys appeared on this brief: Dale O. Thornsjo and Lance D.
Meyer, of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Karen Ventrell, of
Washington, DC. The following attorney also appeared on the appellee brief; Jeanne H. Unger,
of Minneapolis, MN.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable John R. Tunheim. The
judgment of the district court was entered on February 19, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
MER
Enclosure(s)
cc: MO Lawyers Weekly
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 0:09-cv-00287-JRT
Appellate Case: 15-1547
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/09/2016 Entry ID: 4364895
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?