Randall Corwin v. City of Independence, Mo., et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Raymond W. Gruender and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [4426945] [15-1732]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
July 18, 2016
West Publishing
Opinions Clerk
610 Opperman Drive
Building D D4-40
Eagan, MN 55123-0000
RE: 15-1732 Randall Corwin v. City of Independence, MO., et al
Dear Sirs:
A published opinion was filed today in the above case.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was
David Douglas Neuendorf, of Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the
appellant brief; David Douglas Neuendorf, of Kansas City, MO.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee-Independence, MO was
David S. Baker, of Kansas City, MO. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of appellees
Ray County, MO, Aleisa Moeller, and Margaret Farnan was Matthew J. Gist, of Kansas
City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellee brief of Independence, MO;
David S. Baker, of Kansas City, MO. The following attorney(s) appeared on the appellees’ brief
of Ray County, MO, et al.; Robert O. Jester, of Kansas City, MO., and Benjamin Allen StelterEmbry, of Kansas City, MO.
The judge who heard the case in the district court was Honorable Howard F. Sachs. The
judgment of the district court was entered on March 6, 2015.
If you have any questions concerning this case, please call this office.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
LMT
Enclosure(s)
cc: MO Lawyers Weekly
Appellate Case: 15-1732
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/18/2016 Entry ID: 4426945
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:13-cv-00604-HFS
Appellate Case: 15-1732
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/18/2016 Entry ID: 4426945
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?