Kevin Ward v. Bradley Smith, et al
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Michael J. Melloy and Bobby E. Shepherd AUTHORING JUDGE:Bobby E. Shepherd (PUBLISHED) [4482054] [15-2583]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
December 21, 2016
Mr. James Thomas Wicks
BRYAN & CAVE
3800 One Kansas City Place
1200 Main Street
Kansas City, MO 64105-0000
RE: 15-2583 Kevin Ward v. Bradley Smith, et al
Dear Counsel:
The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with
the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in
confidence until that time.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for
mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition
for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day period for
filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
AMT
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. Patrick Ronald Baird
Ms. Stephanie Bradshaw
Ms. Audrey L. Danner
Ms. Catesby Ann Major
Mr. Robert M. Thompson
Ms. Joanna L. W. Trachtenberg
Mr. Kevin Ward
Ms. Paige Wymore-Wynn
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 6:10-cv-03398-ODS
Appellate Case: 15-2583
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/21/2016 Entry ID: 4482054
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?