United States v. Donald Clark Luger
Filing
OPINION FILED - THE COURT: William Jay Riley, Steven M. Colloton and Jane Kelly AUTHORING JUDGE:Jane Kelly (PUBLISHED), CONCUR BY: Steven M. Colloton [4447954] [15-2786]
United States Court of Appeals
For The Eighth Circuit
Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
VOICE (314) 244-2400
FAX (314) 244-2780
www.ca8.uscourts.gov
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
September 14, 2016
Ms. Nancy Hollander
FREEDMAN & BOYD
Suite 700
20 First Plaza
Albuquerque, NM 87102-0000
RE: 15-2786 United States v. Donald Clark Luger
Dear Counsel:
The court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance
with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the
opinion in confidence until that time.
Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the
rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be
received in the clerk's office within 14 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed
petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period
for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant for pro-se-filed petitions. Any
petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 14 day
period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely.
Michael E. Gans
Clerk of Court
AMT
Enclosure(s)
cc:
Mr. Robert Ansley
Mr. Dwane M. Cates
Mr. Gary Lee Delorme
Ms. Amber Fayerberg
Mr. Donald Clark Luger
Ms. Sonja Ralston
Mr. Vincent James Ward
District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 1:13-cr-00092-RRE-1
Appellate Case: 15-2786
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/14/2016 Entry ID: 4447954
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?