Rosalind Cross v. David S. Ferriero


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Duane Benton and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4443280] [15-3057] Appellant's pending motion request for my case to be read and considered is denied as moot.--[Edited 08/31/2016 by MER]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3057 ___________________________ Rosalind M. Cross lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. David S. Ferriero, Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: August 29, 2016 Filed: August 31, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Rosalind M. Cross appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 1 The Honorable John M. Bodenhausen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Appellate Case: 15-3057 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Entry ID: 4443280 This court reviewed the record de novo and carefully considered the arguments for reversal. Summary judgment was proper. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo standard of review; summary judgment is appropriate if record, viewing facts and inferences in light most favorable to nonmoving party, shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Cross’s pending motion is denied as moot. ______________________________ -2- Appellate Case: 15-3057 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Entry ID: 4443280

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?