Rosalind Cross v. David S. Ferriero

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Duane Benton and Jane Kelly (UNPUBLISHED) [4443280] [15-3057] Appellant's pending motion request for my case to be read and considered is denied as moot.--[Edited 08/31/2016 by MER]

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3057
___________________________
Rosalind M. Cross
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
David S. Ferriero, Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: August 29, 2016
Filed: August 31, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Rosalind M. Cross appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her employment-discrimination action. Having jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1

The Honorable John M. Bodenhausen, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Appellate Case: 15-3057

Page: 1

Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Entry ID: 4443280

This court reviewed the record de novo and carefully considered the arguments
for reversal. Summary judgment was proper. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester,
643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo standard of review; summary
judgment is appropriate if record, viewing facts and inferences in light most favorable
to nonmoving party, shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and
moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Cross’s pending motion is
denied as moot.
______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-3057

Page: 2

Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Entry ID: 4443280