Paul Katekaru v. Cameron Egan, et al
Filing
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4465933] [15-3662]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3662
___________________________
Paul David Katekaru
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Cameron Egan, Officer; Greg Bryant, Sergeant; Terri Cipolla Round; City of Lee’s
Summit, Missouri
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: October 31, 2016
Filed: November 3, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Appellate Case: 15-3662
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/03/2016 Entry ID: 4465933
Paul Katekaru appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary
judgment on two of his claims, dismissed a third claim without prejudice for lack of
standing, and denied his post-judgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
59(e). After carefully reviewing the record, and parties’ arguments on appeal, we find
no basis to reverse. See Brooks v. Roy, 776 F.3d 957, 959-60 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant
of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Hodak v. City of St. Peters, 535 F.3d 899,
903 (8th Cir. 2008) (determination as to plaintiff’s standing reviewed de novo);
United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2006)
(denial of Rule 59(e) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Appellate Case: 15-3662
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/03/2016 Entry ID: 4465933
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?