Paul Katekaru v. Cameron Egan, et al


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton and Bobby E. Shepherd (UNPUBLISHED) [4465933] [15-3662]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3662 ___________________________ Paul David Katekaru lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Cameron Egan, Officer; Greg Bryant, Sergeant; Terri Cipolla Round; City of Lee’s Summit, Missouri lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: October 31, 2016 Filed: November 3, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 15-3662 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2016 Entry ID: 4465933 Paul Katekaru appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment on two of his claims, dismissed a third claim without prejudice for lack of standing, and denied his post-judgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). After carefully reviewing the record, and parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis to reverse. See Brooks v. Roy, 776 F.3d 957, 959-60 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Hodak v. City of St. Peters, 535 F.3d 899, 903 (8th Cir. 2008) (determination as to plaintiff’s standing reviewed de novo); United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2006) (denial of Rule 59(e) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Appellate Case: 15-3662 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2016 Entry ID: 4465933

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?