Gustavo Mendoza, et al v. Loretta E. Lynch


PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Lavenski R. Smith, Pasco M. Bowman and Duane Benton (UNPUBLISHED); [4354875-2] Denying petition for review filed by Petitioners Mr. Gustavo Lizardo Mendoza and Mr. Pedro Lizardo Mendoza. [4485378] [16-1079]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court January 03, 2017 Mr. Matthew Lorn Hoppock HOPPOCK LAW FIRM, LLC Suite 130 10985 Cody Street Overland Park, KS 66210 RE: 16-1079 Gustavo Mendoza, et al v. Loretta E. Lynch Dear Counsel: The court today issued an opinion in this case. Judgment in accordance with the opinion was also entered today. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00 a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Please review Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eighth Circuit Rules on postsubmission procedure to ensure that any contemplated filing is timely and in compliance with the rules. Note particularly that petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc must be received in the clerk's office within 45 days of the date of the entry of judgment. Counsel-filed petitions must be filed electronically in CM/ECF. Paper copies are not required. No grace period for mailing is allowed, and the date of the postmark is irrelevant, for pro-se-filed petitions. Any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc which is not received within the 45 day period for filing permitted by FRAP 40 may be denied as untimely. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court JMM Enclosure(s) cc: Ms. Regina Byrd Ms. Karen Yolanda Drummond Mr. Carl H. McIntyre Mr. Anthony Ogden Pottinger District Court/Agency Case Number(s): A099-661-379 A099-661-380 Appellate Case: 16-1079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2017 Entry ID: 4485378

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?