Robert Clayborne, Jr. v. Christopher Eickholt, et al

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Steven M. Colloton, Pasco M. Bowman and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED) [4433278] [16-1615]

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1615
___________________________
Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Lancanster County; Lancaster County Jail Director, individually and in their
official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County Medical Director,
individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County
Correct Care Solutions Medical Department; Mary Howell, Lancaster County
Correct Care Solutions Mental Health Practitioner, individually and in their official
capacity jointly,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants,
Christopher Eickholt, Lancaster County Public Defender/Court Official,
individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lori Pasold,
Lancaster County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and
severally; Stephanie Stacy, Lancaster County District Court Judge, individually
and in their official capacity jointly and severally,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees,
Patrick F. Condon, Lancaster County Chief Deputy County Attorney, individually
and in their official capacity jointly and severally; State of Nebraska,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________

Appellate Case: 16-1615

Page: 1

Date Filed: 08/03/2016 Entry ID: 4433278

Submitted: July 22, 2016
Filed: August 3, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his
serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability
discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo
review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we
conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
-2-

Appellate Case: 16-1615

Page: 2

Date Filed: 08/03/2016 Entry ID: 4433278