United States v. Shawn Sweeney
Filing
[4477375] PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Diana E. Murphy, Steven M. Colloton and Raymond W. Gruender (UNPUBLISHED); Granting [4439616-2] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Bernard John Burns, III. [4477375] [16-3337]
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3337
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Shawn Patrick Sweeney,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: November 30, 2016
Filed: December 8, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Shawn Sweeney directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon
revoking his supervised release. His revocation sentence is composed of six months
1
The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
Appellate Case: 16-3337
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/08/2016 Entry ID: 4477375
in prison and thirty-six months of supervised release. On appeal, Sweeney argues that
the sentence is unreasonable. In addition, his counsel has moved for leave to
withdraw.
Reviewing Sweeney’s revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion, see
United States v. Hum, 766 F.3d 925, 927 (8th Cir. 2014) (per curiam), we conclude
that the sentence is not unreasonable, as both the prison term and the supervisedrelease term are within statutory limitations, and the prison term is within the
applicable advisory Guidelines range, see United States v. Petrekis, 551 F.3d 822,
824 (8th Cir. 2009). We affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
Appellate Case: 16-3337
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/08/2016 Entry ID: 4477375
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?