Celedonia Yue v. Conseco Life Insurance Company

Filing 5

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL ON CROSS APPEAL.. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/11/2011. First cross appeal brief due 08/01/2011 for Conseco Life Insurance Company. Second brief on cross appeal due 08/31/2011 for Celedonia X. Yue. Third brief on cross appeal due 09/30/2011 for Conseco Life Insurance Company . Optional reply brief due 14 days from service of third brief on cross appeal. [7668792] [11-55359, 11-55275] (BG)

Download PDF
Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: March 04, 2011 11-55359 2:08-cv-01506-AHM-SH Celedonia Yue v. Conseco Life Insurance Company Dear Appellants/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAR 04 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CELEDONIA X. YUE, M.D., on behalf of the class of others similarly situated and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 11-55275 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01506-AHM-SH U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles v. TIME SCHEDULE ORDER CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor: Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, FKA Massachusetts General Life Insurance Company, Defendant - Appellant. CELEDONIA X. YUE, M.D., on behalf of the class of others similarly situated and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiff – Cross/Appellant, v. CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor: Philadelphia Life Insurance Company, FKA No. 11-55359 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01506-AHM-SH U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles Massachusetts General Life Insurance Company, Defendant – Cross/Appellee. This order vacates all brief due dates set by previously issued time schedule orders. The parties shall meet the following cross appeal time schedule. Fri., March 11, 2011 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of receiving the email from PACER confirming your registration. Mon., August 1, 2011 The party(s) who filed the first appeal shall file and serve the first brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Wed., August 31, 2011 The party(s) who filed the second appeal shall file and serve the second brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Fri., September 30, 2011 The third brief on cross-appeal shall be filed and served pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional cross appeal reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the third brief on cross appeal, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellants to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Blanca Gurule Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?