Dreamworks Productions, Inc. v. Takahiro Inoue

Filing 1

Download PDF
Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: May 02, 2011 11-55709 8:08-cv-00596-CJC-JWJ Dreamworks Productions, Inc. v. Takahiro Inoue Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAY 02 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DREAMWORKS PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TAKAHIRO INOUE, an individual, Defendant - Appellant. __________________________ HHSI, INC., a California Corporation; KOJI BAN, an individual; PACIFIC AD, a business entity form unknown; PAYMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation; GREEN RUSH, INC., a California corporation; GENIUS TECH, a business entity form unknown; CYBER VISION, a business entity form unknown; MOKETA, INC., a California corporation; ENTAMETECH, INC., a California corporation; PEPOT, a business entity form unknown; 2ND GATE, a business entity form unknown; BIT PUMP, a business entity form unknown; DLN CHECK 033727119, INC., a California Corporation; PACIFIC BILLING, a business entity form unknown; GOOD CROSS, a business entity form unknown; TREND AID No. 11-55709 D.C. No. 8:08-cv-00596-CJC-JWJ U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana TIME SCHEDULE ORDER HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation; CYBER BREEZE, INC., a California corporation; NET SOL, INC., a California corporation; TOMOYA FURUSE, an individual; SUAVEMENTE, INC., a corporation domicile unknown; DYNAMIC WORK, LTD, a business entity form unknown; AZUKI, LTD, a business entity form unknown, Defendants. The parties shall meet the following time schedule. If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply. Mon., May 9, 2011 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of receiving the email from PACER confirming your registration. Wed., June 1, 2011 Transcript shall be ordered. Tue., August 30, 2011 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter. Tue., October 11, 2011 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Thu., November 10, 2011 Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Jennifer Nidorf Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?