Arizona Dream Act Coalition, et al v. Janice Brewer, et al
Filing
Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, MARSHA S. BERZON and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) (Judge Kozinski, dissenting from the filing of the Order. Judge Berzon, concurring in the Amended Opinion.) The court s opinion filed on April 5, 2016, appearing at 818 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2016), is hereby amended. An amended opinion, including a concurrence by Judge Berzon, is filed herewith. Judges Berzon and Christen voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Pregerson so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED, and no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.(SEE ATTACHED ORDER, DISSENT, AMENDED OPINION AND CONCURRENCE FOR FULL TEXT) [10300173]
Case: 15-15307, 02/02/2017, ID: 10300173, DktEntry: 89-1, Page 1 of 2
FOR PUBLICATION
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FEB 02 2017
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARIZONA DREAM ACT COALITION;
CHRISTIAN JACOBO; ALEJANDRA
LOPEZ; ARIEL MARTINEZ; NATALIA
PEREZ-GALLEGOS; CARLA
CHAVARRIA; JOSE RICARDO
HINOJOS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
No.
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
15-15307
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02546-DGC
District of Arizona,
Phoenix
ORDER
v.
JANICE K. BREWER, Governor of the
State of Arizona, in her official capacity;
JOHN S. HALIKOWSKI, Director of the
Arizona Department of Transportation, in
his official capacity; STACEY K.
STANTON, Assistant Director of the
Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona
Department of Transportation, in her
official capacity,
Defendants-Appellants.
Before: PREGERSON, BERZON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The court’s opinion filed on April 5, 2016, appearing at 818 F.3d 901 (9th
Cir. 2016), is hereby amended. An amended opinion, including a concurrence by
Judge Berzon, is filed herewith.
Case: 15-15307, 02/02/2017, ID: 10300173, DktEntry: 89-1, Page 2 of 2
Judges Berzon and Christen voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc,
and Judge Pregerson so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge
requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to
receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc
consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED, and no further petitions for
rehearing will be accepted.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?