State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al

Filing 29

Filed (ECF) Appellees State of Washington and State of Minnesota Correspondence: Declaration and exhibits in support of response to motion [28]. Date of service: 02/06/2017. [10302893] [17-35105]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 02/06/2017 by SLM] (Purcell, Noah) [Entered: 02/06/2017 12:59 AM]

Download PDF
Purcell Declaration Exhibit E DHS Statement on Compliance with Recent Court Order | Homeland Security Official website of the Department of Homeland Contact Us Quick Links Page 1 of 2 Site Map A-Z Index Security DHS Statement on Compliance with Recent Court Order Release Date:  February 4, 2017 For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary Contact: 202-282-8010 WASHINGTON - In accordance with the judge's ruling, DHS has suspended any and all actions implementing the affected sections of the Executive Order entitled, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States." This includes actions to suspend passenger system rules that flag travelers for operational action subject to the Executive Order. DHS personnel will resume inspection of travelers in accordance with standard policy and procedure. At the earliest possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file an emergency stay of this order and defend the president's Executive Order, which is lawful 2/4/2017 DHS Statement on Compliance with Recent Court Order | Homeland Security Page 2 of 2 and appropriate.  The order is intended to protect the homeland and the American people, and the president has no higher duty and responsibility than to do so. ### Topics:  Immigration Enforcement (/topics/immigration-enforcement) , International (/topics/international) Keywords:  immigration (/keywords/immigration) , DOJ (/keywords/doj) , international travel (/keywords/international-travel) Last Published Date: February 4, 2017 2/4/2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?