DE Department of Natural Res. v. EPA
Filing
AMENDED OPINION filed [1563464] (Pages: 30) for the Court by Judge Randolph. [13-1093, 13-1102, 13-1104]
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 1 of 119
The attached material is cited in Delaware Department of
Natural Resources v. EPA, No. 13-1093, slip op. at 19
(D.C. Cir. July 21, 2015); (citing the FERC’s National
Action Plan on Demand, Docket No. AD09-10, at 3,
available on 7/21/15 at http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staffreports/06-17-10-demand-response.pdf).
Archived by the Circuit Library on 7/21/15
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 2 of 119
National Action Plan on
Demand Response
ACTUAL
12
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
FORECAST
9
12
3
6
the federal energy regulatory
commission staff
9
12
3
6
9
3
6
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 3 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
12
9
Document #1563464
12
3
9
12
3
6
6
12
12
9
9
3
9
6
12
9
12
3
9
6
12
9
6
12
9
3
9
6
12
3
9
6
3
9
9
6
3
9
6
3
12
12
3
9
6
12
3
9
6
9
6
12
3
12
3
6
12
6
Page 4 of 119
12
3
Demand Response
9
6
9
National Action Plan on
12
3
12
3
6
3
6
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
3
9
6
3
6
12
3
9
6
3
6
THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION STAFF
June 17, 2010
Docket No. AD09-10
Prepared with the support of
The Brattle Group • GMMB • Customer Performance Group
Definitive Insights • Eastern Research Group
The opinions and views expressed in this staff report do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, its Chairman, or individual Commissioners, and are not binding on the Commission.
12
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
12
3
6
9
3
6
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 5 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 6 of 119
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20426
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
Message From the Chairman
When Congress enacted the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), it directed the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission), an independent regulatory commission, to
develop a National Action Plan that 1) identifies the requirements for technical assistance to states to
allow them to maximize the amount of demand response that can be developed and deployed; 2) designs
and identifies requirements for implementation of a national communications program that includes
broad‐based customer education and support; and 3) develops or identifies analytical tools, information,
model regulatory provisions, model contracts, and other support materials for use by customers, states,
utilities, and demand response providers.
Today, I am pleased to announce the publication of the Commission’s National Action Plan on
Demand Response (National Action Plan), which identifies strategies and activities to achieve the
objectives of EISA. The National Action Plan has been developed through an open and transparent
process. As such, the National Action Plan has been informed by a broad array of comments, and its
success will depend on the participation of a broad spectrum of actors, private and governmental, that
may currently or in the future have a role in the implementation of the National Action Plan. I would like
to extend my sincere appreciation to the many commenters who have contributed to the development of
the National Action Plan and ask for their continued support throughout its implementation.
The release of this National Action Plan should be viewed as a proposal by FERC staff outlining an
approach to achieving greater demand response consistent with the requirements of EISA, not a decision
by the Federal Government to implement this particular approach. FERC staff is aware that the
Administration and Congress must balance many competing priorities and it will be the Administration
and Congress who will determine how the National Action Plan fits into federal policy and budget
priorities. Nevertheless, the National Action Plan offers a path to achieve the goals of EISA and, together
with the U.S. Department of Energy, the Commission and its staff will work to develop an implementation
plan to present to Congress later this year.
Jon Wellinghoff
Chairman
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 7 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 8 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Acknowledgments
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Staff Team
David Kathan, Team Lead
Caroline Daly
Eric Eversole
Maria Farinella
Jignasa Gadani
Ryan Irwin
Cory Lankford
Adam Pan
Christina Switzer
Dean Wight
Key Consultant Support
The Brattle Group: Ahmad Faruqui, Ryan Hledik
GMMB: Susan DiLiddo Michels, Tanja Hester
Customer Performance Group: Peter Honebein, Roy Cammarano
Definitive Insights: David Lineweber, Ph.D.
Eastern Research Group: Christopher Lamie, Linda Cook
National Action Plan on Demand Response
i
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 9 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. ES-1
Introduction ........................................................................................ES-1
Strategic Vision ....................................................................................ES-2
Strategies and Activities .........................................................................ES-2
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1
Legislative Mandate ................................................................................... 2
Background on Demand Response ............................................................... 3
Defining Demand Response ................................................................... 3
Relationship Between Demand Response and Smart Grid ........................... 4
The Geography of Demand Response ...................................................... 5
The Objective of the National Action Plan ...................................................... 6
Sidebar 1: Demand Response in Organized Markets ....................................... 7
Process for Developing the National Action Plan ............................................. 8
Overview of Stakeholder Feedback ............................................................. 10
Structure of the National Action Plan ........................................................... 15
PART 1: STRATEGIC VISION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN ........ 17
1.1 The Coalition ...................................................................................... 17
Why Should a Coalition Be Involved in Implementing the National Action
Plan? ................................................................................................. 17
Who Should Be Involved? ..................................................................... 18
What Elements Make a Coalition Successful? ........................................... 18
How Should the Coalition Operate? ........................................................ 19
1.2 Examples of the Coalition Approach ....................................................... 20
The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency ......................................... 20
Sidebar 2: Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response ........... 21
The Air Bag and Seat Belt Safety Campaign ............................................ 22
PART 2: STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES ............................................ 23
2.1 Technical Assistance to States .............................................................. 24
Introduction ....................................................................................... 24
Technical Assistance Actions ................................................................. 26
Establish a National Forum ................................................................... 26
Conduct Informational and Educational Sessions for Policymakers and
Regulators ......................................................................................... 27
ii
National Action Plan on Demand Response
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 10 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Build a Panel of Demand Response Experts ............................................. 29
Sponsor Technical Papers ..................................................................... 30
Establish a Program for Technical Assistance for Demand Response ............ 31
Provide Demand Response Grants ......................................................... 32
2.2 National Communications Program ........................................................ 34
Introduction ....................................................................................... 34
Objectives of the National Communications Program ................................ 38
National Communications Program Structure ........................................... 39
2.3 Tools and Materials For Use by Customers, States, and Demand Response
Providers ................................................................................................ 58
Develop a Web-based Clearinghouse of Demand Response Materials .......... 59
Develop or Enhance Demand Response Estimation Tools and Methods ........ 67
Sidebar 3: The DRIVE Model ................................................................. 79
APPENDIX A: RESEARCH GAPS ....................................................... A-1
Social Science Research Issues ................................................................ A-1
Technical Research Issues ....................................................................... A-2
APPENDIX B: EXAMPLES OF DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS ......... B-1
Retail Programs ..................................................................................... B-2
Arizona ............................................................................................ B-2
California ......................................................................................... B-2
Connecticut ...................................................................................... B-3
Delaware ......................................................................................... B-4
Florida ............................................................................................. B-4
Georgia ........................................................................................... B-6
Illinois ............................................................................................. B-6
Massachusetts .................................................................................. B-7
Michigan .......................................................................................... B-8
Washington, D.C. ............................................................................B-10
Wholesale Programs ..............................................................................B-12
APPENDIX C: LIST OF COMMENTERS .............................................. C-1
National Action Plan on Demand Response
iii
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 11 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
List of Figures
Figure 1: Functional Overlap in Some National Action Plan Activities ..................... 23
Figure 2: Program Structure ........................................................................... 36
Figure 3: Program Development and Rollout Sequence Over Time ........................ 37
Figure 4: Interaction Between the Communications Umbrella and Local
Implementation ............................................................................................ 40
Figure 5: Regional Demand Response Potential ............................................... B-1
Figure 6: PowerCentsDC Pilot Program Sample Bill ..........................................B-11
List of Tables
Table 1: Segmentation of Message Framework .................................................. 46
Table 2: Strategies and Activities .................................................................... 77
Table 3: Wholesale Programs .......................................................................B-12
iv
National Action Plan on Demand Response
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 12 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Executive Summary
Introduction
T
he Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) is required to develop
the National Action Plan on Demand Response (National Action Plan) as outlined in
section 529 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), entitled “Electricity
Sector Demand Response.” 1 This National Action Plan is designed to meet three objectives:
1. Identify “requirements for technical assistance to States to allow them to maximize
the amount of demand response resources that can be developed and deployed.”
2. Design and identify “requirements for implementation of a national communications
program that includes broad-based customer education and support.”
3. Develop or identify “analytical tools, information, model regulatory provisions,
model contracts, and other support materials for use by customers, states, utilities,
and demand response providers.”
The National Action Plan is intended to be an action plan for the nation for implementation
by states, localities, and regions. Although its actions apply to the entire country, the
National Action Plan recognizes, as Congress intended, the important role that state and local
governments play in developing demand response. The coordinated efforts of federal, state,
and local lawmakers and regulators are needed to enable achievement of the nation’s demand
response potential.
To develop an action plan for the nation, FERC staff solicited and accepted input and
participation from a broad range of industry stakeholders; local, state, and federal governing
officials including state regulatory utility commissioners; and nongovernmental groups
including trade associations. FERC staff conducted extensive outreach to a broad range of
entities and used the input to develop A Discussion Draft on Possible Elements for the
National Action Plan 2 for public comment. A nationally webcast technical conference was
held to encourage further input and participation from all interested entities. After the
conference, written comments were accepted by the Commission. 3 A draft of the National
Action Plan was prepared after reviewing the many ideas that reflect the diverse views of a
1
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-140, § 529, 121 Stat. 1492, 1664
(2007) (to be codified at National Energy Conservation Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 8241, 8279).
2
Discussion Draft on Possible Elements for the National Action Plan (Oct. 2008), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20091028124306-AD09-10-000-Discussion.pdf (Discussion
Draft).
3
Docket No. AD09-10.
Executive Summary
ES-1
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 13 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
broad range of entities. This National Action Plan reflects comments received on the Draft
for Comment of the National Action Plan. 4
Strategic Vision
This National Action Plan calls for the formation of a Coalition to implement the National
Action Plan. Coalitions represent a way of harnessing the collective energy of a variety of
individual organizations and yielding outcomes that have greater reach and depth than those
organizations would achieve acting individually. The Coalition would coordinate the efforts
of state/local governing officials, utilities/load-serving entities, demand response providers,
regional transmission organizations/independent system operators (RTOs/ISOs), consumer
advocates, commercial/industrial customers, the federal government, existing coalitions, and
other stakeholders with respect to the strategies and activities described in the National
Action Plan.
One or more federal agencies participating in the Coalition (for example, the U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE) where appropriate) could direct and (if funds are available) fund
implementation of certain identified activities of the National Action Plan. Activities
identified in the National Action Plan that lend themselves to being accomplished by private
entities would be accomplished using private funding. The work of these private entities
would be coordinated with that of federal, state, and local agencies through the Coalition. In
addition, it also may be useful for an entity or a federal agency (for example, FERC and DOE)
to coordinate and ease implementation by charting the progress of both federal and private
efforts to complete the National Action Plan activities, identifying any gaps in
implementation and, where appropriate, encouraging and working with other members of
the Coalition to fill the gaps.
Strategies and Activities
The National Action Plan consists of strategies and activities to achieve three objectives:
technical assistance to states, a national communications program, and the development or
identification of tools and materials for use by customers, states, and demand response
providers.
1. Technical Assistance to States
The National Action Plan is designed to make available to states the necessary technical
assistance to implement effective demand response programs. Such assistance may include:
•
4
Identifying a panel of demand response experts to help inform various
constituencies about demand response programs, products, technologies, and
Draft for Comment of the National Action Plan on Demand Response (March 2010), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/03-12-10-demand-response.pdf (Draft National Action Plan).
ES-2
Executive Summary
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 14 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
incentives and their costs and benefits. Ideally, these experts would be identified as
those persons having conducted primary and secondary research in the field (as
evidenced by authorship of technical papers), with knowledge of local and regional
issues, and the independence to conduct an unbiased assessment.
•
Sponsoring or conducting primary and secondary research targeted to various
practical aspects of demand response implementation (e.g., sponsorship of technical
papers or pilots), and providing technical assistance for demand response.
•
Sponsoring and participating in national and regional forums and sessions that will
provide information to policymakers, stakeholders, and consumers on efforts to
achieve the National Action Plan, as well as research conducted under the National
Action Plan.
These steps are meant to be complementary, but the federal agencies, the Coalition, and other
private sector actors could implement them as needed, picking and choosing the actions that
will best utilize their resources and that have the greatest value for each actor.
2. National Communications Program
EISA requires that the National Action Plan on Demand Response design and identify
requirements for implementation of a national communications program that includes broadbased customer education and support. The national communications program should have a
multifaceted structure, meaning it would develop and support communications through
multiple channels and media to communicate as appropriate with the many audiences for
demand response. This plan for a national communications program includes three elements:
a Communications Umbrella; local implementation; and direct outreach to states,
policymakers, and partners.
The Communications Umbrella, as a national platform, would create and provide a consistent,
yet flexible, research-based message framework.
This platform would include
communications tools, support, and advice that could be adapted for use by interested local
demand response implementers. 5 It also would communicate directly with large commercial
and industrial customers to inform them of opportunities to participate in demand response
programs and the benefits of doing so.
A local implementation strategy could be designed based on this platform to inform
residential and commercial customers about the availability and possible benefits of demand
response programs, products, technologies, and incentives. Interested local demand response
implementers could use the research-based message framework and communications tools
5
Local demand response implementers are entities, such as state or local governing officials, utilities,
load-serving entities, and other demand response providers, interested in providing demand response
programs, services, rates, incentives, etc., at a local level.
Executive Summary
ES-3
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 15 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
and tactics developed by the Communications Umbrella to tailor messages and materials and
conduct outreach toward their particular customers.
The national communications program also should have a broad national mission to provide
outreach to states, policymakers, and national partners whose support would be needed to
develop cost-effective and beneficial demand response, particularly in areas where there are
no existing demand response programs or current plans to implement such programs.
These strategies, national and local, would occur concurrently based both on their priority
level and on the steps that must occur prior to each stage of the program rollout. Many of the
tasks undertaken by the Communications Umbrella, such as foundational market research,
would necessarily precede local implementation and direct outreach. However, the
experiences of local demand response implementers, national partners, and policymakers will
also inform future program development and message framework development under the
Communications Umbrella.
3. Tools and Materials
The plan for the development, enhancement, or dissemination of tools and materials involves
two general categories of action: 1) a Web-based clearinghouse and 2) tools and methods for
assessing the impacts, costs, benefits, and operation of demand response programs.
A Web-based clearinghouse should be established to provide stakeholders with the most
current information and analyses on demand response. The Web-based clearinghouse could
include existing research as well as new research sponsored by the federal agency or the
Coalition under the National Action Plan. The Web-based clearinghouse would serve as a
centralized location for collecting all publicly available information on demand response,
including regulatory documents, program reports, and other general information. The
clearinghouses may be incorporated as part of an existing clearinghouse operated by a federal
agency (e.g., Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse) or may be operated and maintained by
the Coalition or one of its stakeholders. The clearinghouse should provide information that
stakeholders can use to make their own evaluations and judgments about the reports and data
that they are able to access through the clearinghouse.
Existing analytical tools and methods will need to be enhanced or developed to aid the
expansion of existing demand response programs and the creation of new programs; to
advance the use of demand response to support reliable and efficient operations of wholesale
transmission, energy, capacity, and ancillary services markets; and to better enable end-use
consumers to act optimally while enrolled in a demand response program. The Coalition will
provide input and guidance to organizations in enhancing or developing tools and methods.
These organizations could engage in new research identifying beneficial characteristics of
existing tools or meet through conference venues specifically set up to foster informationsharing on current successful examples.
ES-4
Executive Summary
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 16 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Introduction
D
emand response is a valuable resource for meeting the nation’s energy needs. By
lowering the peak demand for energy, demand response programs reduce the need to
construct new, expensive generation units. However, according to a Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) staff report — A National Assessment of
Demand Response Potential (National Assessment), submitted to Congress in June 2009 —
current demand response programs tap less than a quarter of the total market potential for
demand response. 6 Because current efforts have missed a significant portion of the costeffective demand response potential, it is evident that action needs to be taken to either
create new programs or expand existing ones where cost-effective.
FERC staff has worked with stakeholders to develop this National Action Plan on Demand
Response (National Action Plan), which sets out actions to achieve the demand response
potential in the United States. Congress required FERC to develop such a plan in the Energy
Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. 7 As such, the National Action Plan is
intended to be an action plan for the nation, for implementation by states, localities, and
regions. Although its actions apply to the entire country, the National Action Plan
recognizes, as Congress intended, the important role state and local governments play in
developing demand response. The coordinated efforts of federal, state, and local lawmakers
and regulators are needed to enable achievement of the nation’s demand response potential.
To develop an action plan for the nation, FERC staff and their consultants solicited and
accepted input and participation from a broad range of industry stakeholders; local, state, and
federal governing officials including state regulatory utility commissioners; and
nongovernmental groups including trade associations. FERC staff conducted extensive
outreach to a broad range of entities and used the input to develop A Discussion Draft on
Possible Elements for the National Action Plan 8 for public comment. A nationally webcast
technical conference was held to encourage further input and participation from all
interested entities. After the conference, written comments were accepted by the
Commission. 9 A draft of the National Action Plan was prepared after reviewing the many
6
A National Assessment of Demand Response Potential (June 2009), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/06-09-demand-response.pdf (National Assessment).
7
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-140, § 529, 121 Stat. 1492, 1664
(2007) (to be codified at National Energy Conservation Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 8241, 8279).
8
Discussion Draft on Possible Elements for the National Action Plan (Oct. 2009), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20091028124306-AD09-10-000-Discussion.pdf (Discussion
Draft).
9
Docket No. AD09-10.
Introduction
1
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 17 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
ideas that reflect the diverse views of a broad range of entities. 10 This National Action Plan
reflects comments received on the Draft National Action Plan.
This introduction provides an overview of the National Action Plan, the process behind its
development, and context for understanding it.
Legislative Mandate
Congress required FERC to develop the National Action Plan as the second stage of a threestage process that is outlined in section 529 of EISA, entitled “Electricity Sector Demand
Response.” 11
The three-stage process began with the National Assessment, which was submitted to
Congress in June 2009. The National Assessment evaluated the national- and state-level
potential for demand response that can be achieved within five and 10 years. 12 Additionally,
the National Assessment identified barriers that have limited the deployment of demand
response. The National Assessment also included specific policy recommendations that, if
implemented, could overcome these barriers.
In the second stage, FERC is following Congressional direction to develop the National
Action Plan. This document is designed to meet three objectives:
1. Identify “requirements for technical assistance to States to allow them to maximize
the amount of demand response resources that can be developed and deployed.”
2. Design and identify “requirements for implementation of a national communications
program that includes broad-based customer education and support.”
3. Develop or identify “analytical tools, information, model regulatory provisions,
model contracts, and other support materials for use by customers, States, utilities,
and demand response providers.”
In the third stage, which will commence once the National Action Plan has been developed,
EISA requires “the Commission, together with the Secretary of Energy” to submit a proposal
to implement the National Action Plan to Congress. EISA requires the implementation
proposal to “include specific proposed assignments of responsibility, proposed budget
amounts, and any agreements secured for participation from state and other participants.” 13
10
Draft for Comment of the National Action Plan on Demand Response (March 2010), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/03-12-10-demand-response.pdf (Draft National Action Plan).
11
EISA section 529.
12
National Assessment, supra note 6.
13
EISA section 529(c).
2
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
12
Page 18 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Background on Demand Response
Defining Demand Response
Before discussing the actions set out in the National Action Plan, it is necessary to define the
term “demand response” as it is used here.
The Commission uses “demand response” to refer to the ability of customers to respond to
either a reliability trigger or a price trigger from their utility system operator, load-serving
entity, regional transmission organization/independent system operator (RTO/ISO), or other
demand response provider by lowering their power consumption. For many years, the term
was used to refer to peak clipping actions that were confined to a limited number of hours of
the year. As adopted in Order No. 719, the Commission defined “demand response” to mean
“a reduction in the consumption of electric energy by customers from their expected
consumption in response to an increase in the price of electric energy or to incentive
payments designed to induce lower consumption of electric energy.” 14
Demand response can be both dispatchable and non-dispatchable. “Dispatchable demand
response” refers to planned changes in consumption that the customer agrees to make in
response to direction from someone other than the customer. It includes direct load control
of customer appliances such as those for air conditioning and water heating, directed
reductions in return for lower rates (called curtailable or interruptible rates), and a variety of
wholesale programs offered by RTOs/ISOs that compensate participants who reduce demand
when directed for either reliability or economic reasons. This direction to reduce load can be
in response to acceptance of the consumer’s bid to sell its demand reduction at a price in an
organized market (a wholesale price-responsive demand response) or to a retail provider.
“Non-dispatchable demand response” refers to programs and products in which the customer
decides whether and when to reduce consumption based on a retail rate design that changes
over time. This is sometimes called retail price-responsive demand and includes dynamic
pricing programs that charge higher prices during high-demand hours and lower prices at
other times.
As used in this document, the term “demand response” includes consumer actions that can
change any part of the load profile of a utility or region, not just the period of peak usage. As
a result of technology innovations and policy directions, new types and applications of
demand response are emerging. In particular, consumer response to signals from a utility
system operator, load-serving entity, RTO/ISO, or other demand response provider can be
deployed to shape any or all parts of a customer’s load profile. This concept of demand
response encompasses the effect of smart appliances or devices in customer dwellings that can
respond automatically in near real-time to the signals of a utility, load-serving entity, or other
14
See Wholesale Competition in Regions with Organized Electric Markets, Order No. 719, FERC Stats. &
Regs. ¶ 31,281 (2008), order on reh’g, Order No. 719-A, 74 Fed. Reg. 37,776 (Jul. 29, 2009), FERC
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,292 (2009), order on reh’g, Order No. 719-B, 129 FERC ¶ 61,252 (2009).
Introduction
3
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 19 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
demand response provider, or to changes in bulk power system conditions such as a change in
system frequency. It also includes the smart integration of changeable consumption with
variable generation as one method to better enable the addition of new technologies (such as
wind farms and rooftop solar systems) to utility systems or customer premises. Demand
response also includes deployment of devices that can manage demand as needed to provide
grid services such as regulation and reserves, and can also manage power flows into and out of
energy storage devices such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) batteries to provide
these same grid services. Demand response can go beyond simple reduction in peak period
consumption to include shifting consumption from peak to off-peak hours. For example, the
use of thermal energy storage devices may be advanced through the use of time-of-use rates 15
that encourage nighttime charging of home energy storage systems, PHEVs, and all-electric
vehicles.
Relationship Between Demand Response and Smart Grid
The smart grid and demand response are intrinsically linked in many areas of application.
Many of the benefits associated with investment in the smart grid, such as better consumer
management of electricity usage in response to prices or signals from grid operators, are, at
their core, demand response actions. In turn, investments in some smart grid technologies,
such as smart meters, help enable the demand response potential identified in the National
Assessment. The Commission acknowledges this linkage in its proposed Smart Grid Policy
Statement and Action Plan issued in March 2009:
Smart Grid advancements will apply digital technologies to the grid, and enable realtime coordination of information from generation supply resources, demand
resources, and distributed energy resources (DER). This will bring new efficiencies to
the electric system through improved communication and coordination between
utilities and with the grid, which will translate into savings in the provision of
electric service. Ultimately the smart grid will facilitate consumer transactions and
allow consumers to better manage their electric energy costs. 16
In recognition of this linkage, the actions identified in the National Action Plan are designed
to be consistent, and in coordination, with smart grid policies implemented at the federal,
state, and local levels. Furthermore, as discussed in Part 2, the National Action Plan calls for
developing terminology and messages that emphasize smart energy use, and not artificially
separating smart grid actions from demand response actions.
15
Time-of-use rates are not dynamic (because the rates for each time period are fixed and do not
change with system conditions) and were not included in the National Assessment as a demand
response program. However, they are being included here as an element of the expanded array of
opportunities for customers to reduce demand in response to signals.
16
Smart Grid Policy, Proposed Policy Statement and Action Plan, 126 FERC ¶ 61,253, at P 1 (2009).
4
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 20 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The Geography of Demand Response
To understand the objectives of the National Action Plan, it is useful to review the current
state of demand response in the United States and identify the regions where there are
opportunities for growth. Such information is contained in the National Assessment, which
found that existing demand response programs in the United States have the capacity to offset
four percent of current U.S. peak demand. 17 The existing programs are mostly reliabilitydriven programs — e.g., direct control of end-use loads such as residential air conditioning
and curtailable and interruptible rates for large commercial and industrial customers. 18 These
programs have been in place for decades.
There is considerable geographical variation in the amount of existing demand response. This
variation is driven by several factors, including the rate of load growth, the cost of avoided
capacity, and the regulatory disposition at the state level toward demand-side programs.
Some areas, such as California, Florida, and New England, have significant demand response
activity; others, such as Alaska, Montana, and Wyoming, have little. 19
If the current level of demand response is preserved through the next decade, the National
Assessment estimates that demand response would shave 38,000 megawatts (MW) off U.S.
peak demand in the year 2019. 20 If the existing mix of programs were to expand
geographically to include regions that currently have little demand response activity and if
customer participation rates in every region were to reach the levels representing today’s best
industry practices, the potential impact of demand response programs would be significantly
higher, reaching 82,000 MW, or nine percent of U.S. peak demand. 21
Indeed, an even more diverse approach to demand response might be pursued in the future.
In October 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued 100 awards totaling $3.4
billion to stimulate the development of the smart grid. 22 The awards, chosen from a list of
some 400 proposals, encompass a variety of projects. Some of these projects use demand
response based on pricing concepts such as dynamic pricing.
Dynamic pricing has relatively little market penetration today. In 40 of the 50 states (plus the
District of Columbia), the National Assessment found that dynamic pricing currently has
little to no influence. 23 Either dynamic pricing rates are not being offered in those states or
17
National Assessment, supra note 6, at 27.
18
FERC Staff, Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering (2008), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/12-08-demand-response.pdf.
19
National Assessment, supra note 6, at 42–44.
20
Id. at 27.
21
Id.
22
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability at DOE, Smart Grid Investment Grant Awards,
http://www.oe.energy.gov/recovery/1249.htm.
23
The National Assessment provides a state-level analysis of demand response, including a snapshot of
existing programs. The full set of results at the state level for 2009 through 2019 is contained within
Introduction
5
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 21 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
customer participation rates are too low to produce significant impacts. In 10 states, dynamic
pricing is estimated to have an impact of one percent or less; in one state, it has an impact of
around two percent. However, the National Assessment also found that, with greater
inclusion of these price-based demand response programs in the mix of possible options, the
total potential for demand response would be far greater. The total potential could range
between 14 and 20 percent of peak demand, or 138,000 to 188,000 MW, depending on
whether dynamic pricing was deployed on an opt-in basis or opt-out basis. 24
This snapshot of the state of demand response leads to the conclusion that there is a
significant gap between today’s levels of demand response and the total potential that resides
in the full portfolio of cost-effective options. The clear challenge — and opportunity — is to
establish a path forward for realizing this potential consistent with state and federal policies
and regulations.
The Objective of the National Action Plan
The National Action Plan aspires to meet the requirements specified in EISA: identify
“requirements for technical assistance to States to allow them to maximize the amount of
demand response resources that can be developed and deployed;” design and identify
“requirements for implementation of a national communications program that includes
broad-based customer education and support;” and develop or identify “analytical tools,
information, model regulatory provisions, model contracts, and other support materials for
use by customers, states, utilities, and demand response providers.” 25 To achieve this
objective, the National Action Plan calls for two simultaneous, compatible paths of action: 1)
enabling development of price-responsive demand response programs, products, technologies,
and incentives and 2) facilitating market penetration of newly developing “smart grid”
technologies and programs.
With respect to the first path, the National Action Plan seeks to identify technical assistance,
communications strategies, and other tools to achieve deployment of the maximum amount
of price-responsive demand response identified in the National Assessment. The focus of this
path is driven by the results of the National Assessment, which modeled great potential for
peak load reductions from price-driven demand response, such as retail dynamic pricing rate
designs enabled through advanced metering. The success of these programs will require the
approval and full partnership of state and local regulators.
the model developed for the National Assessment, available at
http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/NADR-model.xls.
24
Id. at 27.
25
EISA section 529.
6
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 22 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Sidebar 1: Demand Response in Organized Markets
During the past decade, demand response resources have significantly increased their
market share in organized markets. FERC and the RTOs/ISOs themselves have acted to
eliminate barriers to demand response participation in organized wholesale energy,
capacity, and ancillary services markets, and to ensure that demand response resources
that are technically capable of providing a service are treated comparably to supply
resources offering the service. For example, demand response resources that are capable
of providing reserves may participate in the day-ahead and real-time ancillary services
markets in the Midwest ISO.1 Furthermore, demand response resources may offer
operating reserves and regulation service in the New York ISO, participate in the California
ISO’s energy and ancillary services markets, and participate in PJM’s Reliability Pricing
Model and ISO New England’s Forward Capacity Market. Appendix B provides a list of the
current opportunities for demand response resources to participate in RTO/ISO markets.
As a means of supporting these initiatives, FERC issued Order No. 719 on October 17,
2008. Through this order, the Commission sought to further address barriers to demand
response participation in ISO and RTO markets. Among various reforms, Order No. 719
required system operators to accept bids from qualified demand response resources to
provide ancillary services, and eliminated deviation charges during system emergencies to
buyers taking less energy in real time than purchased day-ahead.2 Also, unless prohibited
by state or local law, Order No. 719 permitted aggregators of retail customers to bid
demand response on behalf of retail customers directly into the organized markets.3
Presently, 31,695 MW of demand response are available in ISO and RTO markets, up from
17,146 MW at the end of 2006. Such gains represent 6.6 percent of 2008 peak electricity
demand within the regions combined.4 Demand response capacity resources have nearly
tripled in the New England ISO and PJM territories, and resources providing ancillary
services accounted for more than 4,000 MW at the end of 2008. Such an infusion of
demand response resources has aided in providing greater grid reliability, mitigation of
generation market power, and an overall decline in fuel-adjusted power prices in organized
wholesale markets.5 Moreover, permitting aggregators of retail customers and other
curtailment service providers to participate in organized wholesale markets facilitates
greater involvement from customers such as universities, big-box retailers, and residential
customers.
1
FERC Staff, Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering, at 41 (2008), available at
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/12-08-demand-response.pdf.
2
Order No. 719, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,281 at P 15.
3
Id.; Order No. 719-A, 128 FERC ¶ 61,059 at P 51. (On rehearing the Commission broadly affirmed
its finding, but took a different approach with small utilities.)
4
ISO/RTO Council, 2009 State of the Markets Report, at 26 (2009).
5
Id. at 18.
Introduction
7
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 23 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
With respect to the second path, the National Action Plan sets forth technical assistance,
communications strategies, and other tools to be used to develop and deploy emerging costeffective smart grid technologies and resources (such as dispatchable and automated demand
response) that enable customers to respond to price or other signals. This includes
development and deployment of dispatchable demand response as a versatile resource for a
variety of applications besides lowering peak demand. Examples include automating demand
response, using demand response to provide operating reserves and other ancillary services,
and partnering demand response with wind generation and other variable resources when
appropriate.
These new and emerging technologies and applications offer benefits that go beyond those
that would be derived from the potential estimates in the National Assessment. Further,
these technologies can bring the benefits of demand response to all consumers. They also
may be helpful by serving as a bridge or facilitating the transition to some form of retail rate
design, such as dynamic pricing, for states that choose that path. Therefore, the National
Action Plan builds on the successes of demand response initiatives by enabling dispatchable
demand response (dispatchable to price and non-price directions) programs, products,
technologies, and incentives; fostering the continued deployment of advanced metering
initiatives (AMI) and dynamic pricing; employing competitive market forces to develop more
customer demand response; and planning for the deployment of many innovative demand
response applications that create greater consumer control over energy usage when they
create new cost-saving opportunities for consumers. If achieved, these developments should
allow business and other customers to make better choices about consumption, which in turn
may allow power markets to work better, lower costs, and may benefit the environment.
The National Action Plan is a plan for all parties with a stake in demand response.
Stakeholders that have either started to design or already established demand response
programs, as well as stakeholders that have an interest in demand response but have not
established programs, can benefit from the National Action Plan. The need to appeal to
consumers, states, utilities, and a broad range of stakeholders can be met through extensive
involvement of these groups throughout the implementation of the National Action Plan.
Process for Developing the National Action Plan
EISA requires the development of the National Action Plan after “soliciting and accepting
input and participation from a broad range of industry stakeholders, state regulatory utility
commissioners, and non-governmental groups.” 26 Also, the Commission is directed to “seek
consensus where possible, and decide on optimum solutions to issues that defy consensus.” 27
As a result, the process for developing the National Action Plan was designed to gather
26
EISA section 529.
27
Id.
8
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 24 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
feedback from interested parties, and the final document reflects feedback from a broad range
of industry stakeholders.
Specifically, development of the National Action Plan consisted of the following steps:
1. Review existing literature. To initiate the research process and avoid duplication of
efforts, FERC staff reviewed the existing literature on demand response, national
communications programs, and similar action plans in other areas and industries.
The review produced a number of “lessons learned” from these programs.
Additionally, this review identified a number of research gaps that have become the
focus of some of the specific elements of the National Action Plan.
2. Conduct stakeholder outreach. In summer 2008, FERC staff initiated a year-long
informal outreach effort involving a diverse group of stakeholders on possible
elements of the National Action Plan that would meet the objectives of EISA. This
outreach effort consisted of informal interviews with regulators, utilities, consumers,
trade organizations, and other stakeholders. The feedback that was received
through these efforts contributed to the Discussion Draft.
3. Develop the Discussion Draft. This document contained an overarching strategy for
the National Action Plan, centered on the creation of a Coalition of stakeholders to
steer the effort forward. It also discussed a wide range of possible tactical elements
that could be included in the National Action Plan. The Discussion Draft was
designed to provide concrete ideas and information to which the various
stakeholders could react and provide additional comments. It was made available
for public comment when it was posted on the FERC website on October 28, 2009.
4. Hold a technical conference. As another means for gathering feedback on the
Discussion Draft, FERC staff held a technical conference on November 19–20 in
Washington, D.C. The first day of the conference consisted of two panel sessions. A
dozen speakers drawn from different facets of the demand response community,
including state regulatory utility commissioners and nongovernmental groups,
presented their views on the Discussion Draft. The next day, three breakout
sessions (moderated by FERC staff) were held on specific elements of the Discussion
Draft. The conference closed with a plenary session in which summaries of the
breakout sessions were presented. The panel presentations and a summary
discussion of the breakout sessions were publicly broadcast over the Internet. 28
5. Gather written comments on the Discussion Draft. In addition to providing
feedback at the technical conference, interested parties were encouraged to provide
written comments. They filed comments reflecting many points of agreement and
28
A transcript of this conference, along with materials provided by speakers, is available on the FERC
website at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response.asp.
Introduction
9
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 25 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
some differing opinions. 29 Appendix C lists the organizations that commented
during the technical conference or through written comments.
6. Develop Draft National Action Plan. FERC staff developed the Draft National
Action Plan based on the Discussion Draft and the feedback received through the
technical conference and written comments submitted following the technical
conference. It was posted on the FERC website on March 11, for public comment.
7. Review filed written comments on the Draft National Action Plan. Interested
persons provided written comments on the Draft National Action Plan. The filed
comments indicated consensus in most areas and disagreement in some others.
Appendix C lists the organizations that filed written comments to the FERC on the
Draft National Action Plan.
This final National Action Plan is the product of all these consensus-building activities.
Overview of Stakeholder Feedback
Those who filed comments, with few exceptions, were generally supportive of the Draft
National Action Plan. In particular, commenters indicate broad support for the development
of a Coalition to contribute to the implementation of the National Action Plan. Commenters
also agree that cost-effectiveness should be a key consideration in the National Action Plan.
Commenters generally support the message framework development activities under the
national communications program, such as developing adaptable, consumer-friendly messages
and linking demand response with other smart energy use principles. Submitted comments
also reflect general agreement on the importance of conducting foundational market research.
Additionally, commenters generally agree that the national communications program should
supplement, and not supplant, existing local outreach efforts.
A number of commenters raised issues and expressed different views regarding funding of the
National Action Plan. The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
(NASUCA) points out that the National Action Plan does not indicate the source of funding
for many of the strategies and activities. The American Public Power Association (APPA)
states that the federal government should fund the National Action Plan, whereas General
Electric Energy (GE) recommends that the Commission identify non-federal funding sources
for the initial phase of the National Action Plan. Wal-Mart comments that the Coalition
members should not provide funding for the Coalition. The National Action Plan, based on
these comments, leaves flexibility for funding from a variety of sources for each strategy and
activity.
29
10
These comments are available in Docket No. AD09-10, which is the docket for the National Action
Plan on Demand Response.
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 26 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The comments on both the Draft National Action Plan and on the Discussion Draft indicate a
lack of consensus with regard to a demand response grant program. GE and Tendril both
provided comments to the Draft National Action Plan strongly supporting the creation of
such a program. The Demand Response Coordinating Committee (DRCC) stated that a grant
program should be included as one among several options to provide financial support for
demand response programs. In the comments on the Discussion Draft, the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC); Tendril; To the Point; North America Power Producers, Ltd;
Energy Curtailment Specialists; APPA; Peak Load Management Alliance (PLMA); Smart Grid
Library; and the New York Public Service Commission expressed support for a grant program.
In its Discussion Draft comments, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
(NRECA) stated that a grant program should not be a priority, and Occidental calls the grant
proposal overly broad and recommends that grants be restricted to state regulatory
commissions or energy agencies to enable them to obtain assistance necessary to facilitate
design and implementation of demand response. The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio’s
(PUCO’s) Discussion Draft comments indicate support for a grant program with the caveat
that PUCO does not support such a program if funding opportunities are intended to pass
through states, because many states are not well structured for grant distribution. Because
the majority of comments filed in response to the Discussion Draft and the Draft National
Action Plan favor the creation of a demand response grant program, the National Action Plan
states that the Coalition should strive to establish such a program, to the extent that the
Administration, Congress, and/or private actors decide to make funds available for such a
program.
Stakeholders also express divergent views on having two simultaneous, compatible paths of
action, as called for in the Draft National Action Plan: 1) enabling price-responsive demand
response and 2) facilitating market penetration of newly developing “smart grid” technologies
and programs. Both ISO-New England and Wal-Mart support both paths of action. On the
other hand, APPA argues that having two paths gives undue weight to smart grid technology,
while the Maryland Public Service Commission (Maryland PSC) suggests not explicitly
identifying price-responsive demand response as one of the two primary paths, because it is
difficult to quantify. Maryland PSC also states that the Draft National Action Plan may be
prejudging the value of price-responsive demand response before its cost-effectiveness has
been fully evaluated and that the Draft National Action Plan overlooks conflict between
wholesale and retail jurisdiction, even though price-responsive demand response hinges
largely on deployment of advanced metering initiatives at the retail level. NASUCA
comments that the paths of action should maximize the value of cost-effective demand
response for consumers. The National Action Plan maintains the two paths of action and
emphasizes that both paths take into the account the importance of cost-effectiveness.
Commenters disagree on the role and composition of the Coalition proposed in the draft
National Action Plan. APPA supports the draft’s approach regarding the Coalition’s role to
provide input and support to a federal agency implementing the National Action Plan. Xcel
states that it is in favor of a Coalition assisting the federal government in implementing the
Introduction
11
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 27 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
National Action Plan, but voices its concerns about the effectiveness of a Coalition. In
contrast to the approach provided in the draft, the DRCC, the Demand Response and Smart
Grid Coalition (DRSG), ISO-New England, National Grid, and San Diego Gas & Electric
comment that the Coalition should play the lead role in implementation of the National
Action Plan.
Though commenters disagree on the role of the Coalition, DRCC, DRSG, and Ice Energy each
support forming a coalition of coalitions. DRCC states that it has already begun to form a
coalition of coalitions, and National Grid states that the DRCC already provides a national
forum for stakeholders and would be an appropriate candidate to serve as a Coalition leader.
Edison Electric Institute (EEI) and Southern Company state that the National Action Plan
should implement a decentralized approach whereby several regional coalitions are created to
develop and oversee execution of a demand response strategy.
In light of these comments expressing various thoughtful views, the National Action Plan has
been revised so that Coalition members, collectively or individually, would implement
various National Action Plan activities. It provides that responsibility for particular activities
would be determined and coordinated through Coalition discussions. The Coalition would
provide an opportunity for stakeholders to share insights and experiences and to identify
common goals, areas of mutual concern or need, and current gaps.
Commenters voice differing opinions on the Coalition’s composition.
New York
Transmission Owners (NYTO) argues that the Coalition should be made up of a broad group
of organizations representing a variety of interests and regions. NASUCA emphasizes that the
Commission should ensure that the consumer voice is represented in the Coalition and states
that the voluntary nature of the Coalition and the number of individuals involved could lead
to organizational problems. Xcel states that Coalition membership should be limited so that
the Coalition will be an effective liaison between the federal agency and stakeholders, and
states that its membership should include those with qualitative/technical expertise and those
with policy/regulatory expertise. Because of the need to involve all stakeholders, the
National Action Plan provides that the Coalition will be composed of volunteers who
represent federal, state, and local governments; utilities; load-serving entities; and other
demand response providers, RTOs and ISOs, commercial and industrial customers, consumer
advocacy organizations, demand response coalitions, and other interest groups.
There is no consensus among commenters regarding the role of the federal government.
Several commenters state that the federal agency should oversee, support, advise, and
facilitate Coalition implementation of the National Action Plan. San Diego Gas & Electric
(SDG&E), on the other hand, voices concern that the draft envisions too large a role for a
federal agency. Despite such concerns, commenters state that DOE is the logical and
appropriate federal agency to be involved in the National Action Plan’s implementation.
After consideration of the comments, the National Action Plan now states that one or more
12
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 28 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
federal agencies will be part of the Coalition, and have a unique role, but not necessarily a
lead role, in implementation of the National Action Plan.
At least one commenter disagrees with some of the Draft National Action Plan’s strategies
and activities related to technical assistance to states. The CPUC suggests that there might be
no need for the Coalition to provide technical advice to states, because private organizations
can do so through state and local proceedings. The Illinois Commerce Commission, along
with several others, believes technical assistance to states is critical, however. The National
Action Plan retains these actions for technical assistance to states in part because it is a clear
statutory requirement of EISA, as well as because of the strong support for efforts regarding
technical assistance to states at the October technical conference and in written comments on
the Discussion Draft.
Several commenters take opposing views on the need for a national educational campaign
with a broad message on demand response as part of the national communications program.
In filed comments responding to the Discussion Draft, Southern California Edison Company,
Occidental, SDG&E, and Florida Power & Light voiced their opposition to the creation of a
national demand response message communicating directly to the mass market. NASUCA
and the NRECA expressed the view that a uniform national message would provide incorrect
information to many consumers and could do more harm than good. NRECA, CPUC, and
others also stated that a national message could override or confuse existing local
communications programs that have succeeded in developing and promoting locally focused
and locally appropriate demand response programs for consumers. Based on this input, the
Draft National Action Plan proposed developing a research-based message framework, tools,
and support materials that local demand response implementers can tailor to supplement or
enhance their current communications efforts rather than providing a national demand
response message. Wal-Mart, NRECA, and APPA support the message framework approach
taken in the national communications program section as envisioned in the Draft National
Action Plan. EnerNOC’s comments to the Draft National Action Plan point out that a
blanket advertising campaign at the national level would not be realistic given the variation
among states, regions, and customers.
However, in its response to the Draft National Action Plan, DRCC comments that the final
plan should include a comprehensive communications component that attempts to undertake
high-level awareness and educational communications in addition to efforts that support local
communications. This recommendation conflicts with comments received in response to the
Discussion Draft. EEI also supports broad-based national public education messages, but
states that national messages should not supplant the communications efforts from local or
regional level program providers to end-use customers. Because of the broad, but nonunanimous opposition to national messages, the National Action Plan retains the researchbased message framework approach whereby the national communications program would
Introduction
13
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 29 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
provide to local demand response implementers 30 communications tools, support, and advice
that local demand response implementers can then adapt to their needs.
During the November 2009 staff technical conference, several stakeholders emphasized the
importance of outreach to commercial and industrial customers. Hess supported broad
communications to commercial and industrial customers stating that these customers will
deliver the most impact early in the National Action Plan. Alcoa stated that large industrial
customers can potentially deliver large amounts of demand response. PLMA also stated that
the commercial and industrial sector is capable of substantial demand response contributions
and suggested facilitating their participation through educational support and coordinating
outreach with existing delivery channels. However, several commenters on the Draft
National Action Plan, such as American Electric Power, the CPUC, EEI, Southern Company,
and SDG&E, argue against direct communications with large commercial and industrial
customers as part of the national communications program. The National Action Plan retains
the outreach and support materials effort to large commercial and industrial customers that is
needed to develop the large demand response potential of this unique customer class.
However, to reflect commenters’ concerns, the National Action Plan calls for the Coalition to
coordinate outreach to these customers, removes the role of a federal agency in overseeing
outreach to these customers, and focuses the outreach on providing general information and
support materials.
The comments reflect some difference of views regarding the development of tools for enduse customers. DRCC believes that it is unlikely that tools will need to be developed for enduse customers, because private sector innovation is currently addressing this need. National
Grid states that there is a need for additional tools for customers to use in analyzing and
implementing demand response programs. Because of the EISA requirement to identify and
develop such tools and materials as well as the large untapped national potential for demand
response by end-use customers and the widespread belief by many stakeholders that better
tools are needed to facilitate their participation in demand response programs, the National
Action Plan provides for the development of such tools.
30
14
Local demand response implementers are entities, such as state or local governing officials, utilities,
load-serving entities, and other demand response providers, interested in providing demand response
programs, services, rates, incentives, etc., at a local level.
Introduction
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 30 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Structure of the National Action Plan
The rest of the National Action Plan is divided into two main parts.
Part 1 provides an overview of the strategic vision of the National Action Plan. It begins with
a description of the Coalition-based approach as the framework for implementing the
elements of the National Action Plan. It then describes basic principles of the Coalition.
Finally, Part 1 presents case studies of how the Coalition approach has succeeded in other
applications.
Part 2 sets out the elements of the National Action Plan. These actions are organized into
three categories: technical assistance to states; the national communications program; and
development or identification of tools and materials for use by customers, states, and demand
response providers.
Introduction
15
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 31 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 32 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
PART 1:
Strategic Vision of the
National Action Plan
1.1 The Coalition
T
his National Action Plan calls for the formation of a Coalition to coordinate the
implementation of the National Action Plan. Coalitions represent a way to harness the
collective energy of a variety of individual organizations, yielding outcomes that have greater
reach and depth than those organizations would achieve acting individually. The Coalition
would coordinate and combine the efforts of state/local governing officials, utilities/loadserving entities, RTOs/ISOs, consumer advocates, commercial/industrial customers, the
federal government, existing coalitions, and other stakeholders with respect to the strategies
and activities described in the National Action Plan.
Why Should a Coalition Be Involved in Implementing the National
Action Plan?
The process of generating electricity and delivering it to end-use customers is complex; varies
by locality, state, and region; and involves many different actors and interests. Likewise, how
demand response is used today also varies greatly by locality, state, and region. For example,
some demand response is utilized through regional wholesale markets and programs, and
some demand response is operated at the retail electricity level, through programs that are
under the jurisdiction of and overseen by state regulators or locally appointed or elected
governing boards for publicly and cooperatively owned electric utilities. These differences
should be acknowledged so that the framework of the National Action Plan is inclusive and
can be tailored to each locality, state, and region.
Encouraging the participation of local, state, and federal government actors as well as
utilities/load-serving entities, demand response providers, RTOs/ISOs, and customers
(industrial, commercial, and residential customers) will help ensure that the National Action
Plan reflects regional differences and taps into the expertise and experience of various groups.
A Coalition will give these stakeholders an opportunity to work together to build support for
a comprehensive national strategy and ensure its success.
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
17
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 33 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Who Should Be Involved?
For the effort to be a success, the Coalition should be composed of volunteers from:
•
Federal, state, and local governments
•
Utilities, load-serving entities, and other demand response providers
•
RTOs/ISOs
•
Commercial and industrial customers
•
Consumer advocates
•
Existing coalitions
•
Interest groups and other stakeholders
What Elements Make a Coalition Successful?
There are many factors that help a Coalition succeed:
1. Clear goals. The Coalition stakeholders need to have a clear understanding and
agreement on the goals they are trying to meet.
2. A clear organizational structure. Stakeholders of the Coalition need to understand
how decisions are made, how work will be completed, and how accountability for
achieving the goals of the National Action Plan will be measured.
3. Good leadership. An effective Coalition is composed of effective volunteers and,
depending on the nature of the work, strong guides who provide assistance and
direction to help the volunteers achieve their goals.
a. Effective volunteers. First and foremost, stakeholders should be cooperative
and support the National Action Plan goals. These stakeholders should be
leaders who are empowered to make decisions for their respective
organizations. They also must have time to commit to the responsibilities of
the Coalition. 31
b. Effective volunteer leaders. A smaller subset of stakeholders who are wellversed in working with other volunteers and are willing to provide leadership
to the overall Coalition.
31
18
Larry Cohen et al., Developing Effective Coalitions: An Eight Step Guide, in Community Health
Education & Promotion: A Guide to Program Design and Evaluation, 144-161 (Mary Ellen Wurzbach
ed., 2d ed. 2002).
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 34 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
c. Assistance and support. Given that stakeholders will be volunteering their
time, it may be important to have an entity or a federal agency (for example,
FERC and/or DOE) observe the progress of both federal and private efforts to
complete the National Action Plan activities, ease implementation by tracking
these efforts, be aware of any gaps in implementation, and, where appropriate,
encourage and work with federal and/or private actors to fill the gaps.
4. Funding. Each stakeholder will fund its own participation in the Coalition.
Under the National Action Plan, the Coalition would be established with the participation of
all stakeholders. The Coalition could be established under a number of different scenarios.
For example, part of the National Forum could be dedicated to identifying an organizational
structure for the Coalition. Whatever means is chosen to establish a Coalition, stakeholders
should consider leveraging the experience of existing coalitions to determine an appropriate
format for collaborating on the activities identified in the National Action Plan.
How Should the Coalition Operate?
The Coalition would serve as a forum for its stakeholders to coordinate implementation of the
National Action Plan. While each stakeholder in the Coalition would be responsible for
implementing particular activities identified in the National Action Plan, the Coalition would
provide an opportunity for these entities to share insights, experiences, current gaps, and
areas of mutual concern or need and agree on coordinated strategies.
Under the National Action Plan, one or more federal agencies participating in the Coalition
(for example, DOE where appropriate) would direct and perhaps also fund implementation of
certain identified activities of the National Action Plan that it chooses to fund. Activities
identified in the National Action Plan that lend themselves to being accomplished by private
entities would be accomplished using private funding. Existing coalitions could share their
expertise and may be able to provide long-term support and leadership for the Coalition. The
work of these private entities would be coordinated with that of federal agencies through the
Coalition to the extent practical and legally permitted. This would help ensure that the
efforts of governing officials, utilities/load-serving entities, RTOs/ISOs, demand response
providers, consumer advocates, commercial/industrial customers, and other stakeholders are
leveraged and/or enhanced.
In addition, it also could be useful for a federal agency (for example, FERC and/or DOE) to
observe the progress of both federal and private efforts to complete the National Action Plan
activities, ease implementation by tracking these efforts, be aware of any gaps in
implementation and, where appropriate, encourage and work with federal and/or private
actors to fill the gaps.
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
19
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 35 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
1.2 Examples of the Coalition Approach
The use of a Coalition has been successful in similar national efforts. Two examples, differing
in objectives and approach, illustrate the Coalition approach to communicating the benefits
and opportunities for demand response and to developing the methods and tools that states,
utilities, demand response providers, and others involved find useful and beneficial to
consumers. Appendix A contains more information on these two examples.
The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency
In 2006, a Leadership Group composed of more than 50 leading electric and gas utilities, state
utility commissioners, state air and energy agencies, energy service providers, energy
consumers, and energy efficiency and consumer advocates released the National Action Plan
for Energy Efficiency. 32 This report is a call to action to increase investment in ratepayerfunded energy efficiency; it lays out five main policy recommendations to achieve greater
investment from sponsoring organizations.
The Leadership Group then called for
development of a set of resource materials, largely best practices based on the last two decades
of experiences in implementing ratepayer-funded energy efficiency, for parties who are
interested in pursuing ratepayer-financed energy efficiency. In 2008, the National Action
Plan for Energy Efficiency was updated with the Vision for 2025, 33 which identifies 10
implementation goals and measures the progress made so far. Recently, the Leadership Group
sponsored a report to explore the coordination of demand response and energy efficiency,
which is described in Sidebar 2.
The initial Leadership Group was co-chaired by the then-president of the National
Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), Diane Munns, and the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, James Rogers. DOE and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) participation in the Leadership Group is limited to facilitation. As
of January 2010, more than 120 organizations have endorsed the National Action Plan for
Energy Efficiency recommendations and/or made commitments to promote energy efficiency
within their spheres of influence. The Leadership Group and its National Action Plan for
Energy Efficiency ended its activities in November 2009, after having achieved its original
purpose of serving to draw member attention to energy efficiency.
32
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency (2006), available
at http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/napee/napee_report.pdf.
33
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Vision for 2025: A
Framework for Change, at ES-1 (2008), available at
http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/vision.pdf.
20
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 36 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Sidebar 2: Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response
In support of the 10 implementation goals outlined in the National Action Plan for Energy
1
Efficiency’s Vision for 2025, the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, with input from
the Leadership Group, released a paper discussing the coordination of energy efficiency and
2
demand response in January 2010. The paper defines energy efficiency as “using less
energy to provide the same or improved level of service to the energy consumer in an
economically efficient way.”3 On the other hand, demand response “entails customers
changing their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of energy
over time or to incentive payments designed to induce lower electricity use when prices are
4
high or system reliability is in jeopardy.” The paper also recognizes that energy efficiency
and demand response currently have significant differences in how they are measured,
what organizations offer them, how they are delivered to customers, and how they are
rewarded in the marketplace. In order to reduce these differences and achieve possible
benefits, the paper outlines ways in which energy efficiency and demand response can be
coordinated. It discusses the concerns and barriers affecting the coordination of energy
efficiency and demand response, and articulates steps that can be taken to achieve better
coordination.
Energy efficiency and demand response programs are rarely combined into an integrated
program. The paper states that “in December 2009, out of 2,016 U.S. and Canadian
energy efficiency, demand response, and load management programs in the E Source
database, only 56 were identified as serving both energy efficiency and demand response
purposes.”5 Therefore, one way in which to better coordinate energy efficiency and
demand response is to offer combined offerings in the future. Even if energy efficiency and
demand response programs are not combined, program sponsors could provide marketing
and education on these programs in a more unified way. Furthermore, both private firms,
via finding customers interested in reducing their energy costs, and the government, via
building codes and appliance standards, can contribute to the simultaneous achievement of
energy efficiency and demand response goals.
Nevertheless, the integration of energy efficiency and demand response programs remains
a difficult and complex endeavor for several reasons. First, the funding for energy
efficiency and demand response can sometimes come from different sources. Second,
some energy efficiency managers have expressed reservations about demand response
interfering with their programmatic goals. Third, retail rates need to be designed with
energy efficiency and demand response objectives in mind — i.e., dynamic or time-varying
rates may be best offered with inclining block rates. Finally, it will take time to develop the
capabilities of utility staff and contractors in both energy efficiency and demand response.
The paper states that many actions can be taken in order to encourage better coordination
of energy efficiency and demand response. Examples include clear regulatory signals that
encourage utilities and grid operators to coordinate energy efficiency and demand response
activities, better articulated demand-side management program goals that target both
energy savings (energy efficiency) and peak demand reductions (demand response), and a
new set of consumer education activities that simultaneously explicate energy efficiency
and demand response benefits.
1
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, supra note 28.
2
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand
Response (2010) (Prepared by Charles Goldman (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Michael
Reid (E Source), Roger Levy, and Alison Silverstein), available at www.epa.gov/eeactionplan.
3
Id. at ES-1.
4
Id.
5
Id. at ES-3.
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
21
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 37 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The Air Bag and Seat Belt Safety Campaign
In 1993, General Motors and the National Safety Council formed the Air Bag and Seat Belt
Safety Campaign, a coalition of automobile manufacturers, insurance companies, the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, safety organizations, law enforcement associations,
and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, to address the issue of child air bag
deaths and stagnant nationwide seat belt use. 34 They conducted a national umbrella
campaign to encourage parents to restrain their children properly in the back seat, and to
encourage all drivers and passengers to buckle up. This campaign also provided media and
organizational outreach materials to states and communities so that they were well prepared
to serve as spokespeople for the effort even if they were not demonstration program states.
As a result of the Air Bag and Seat Belt Safety Campaign’s work in demonstration states and
then nationwide, seat belt use increased more than it ever had during a prior period, from 61
percent in 1996 to a record high of 82 percent in 2005. 35 Child fatalities from traffic crashes
dropped by 20 percent, and proper restraint use among toddlers jumped dramatically from 60
to 94 percent. 36
34
For more information about the Air Bag and Seat Belt Safety Campaign, visit
http://www2.nsc.org/airbag.htm. General Motors and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
provided the primary funding.
35
National Safety Council, National Safety Council Honors Air Bag and Seat Belt Safety Campaign for
Lifesaving Achievements (2006), available at http://www.csrwire.com/press/press_release/18157National-Safety-Council-Honors-Air-Bag-and-Seat-Belt-Safety-Campaign-for-LifesavingAchievements.
36
National Safety Council, Welcome to the Air Bag & Seat Belt Campaign (2004), available at
http://www2.nsc.org/airbag.htm.
22
Part 1: Strategic Vision of the National Action Plan
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 38 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
PART 2:
Strategies and Activities
T
his section sets out a number of strategies and activities that will be pursued through the
National Action Plan to fulfill the objectives in EISA section 529.
The activities are organized into three categories: technical assistance to states, the national
communications program, and development or identification of tools and materials for use by
customers, states, and demand response providers. However, there will be significant,
inherent overlap between these categories of activity. Requirements for tools and materials
can be developed and coordinated at the same time as requirements for technical assistance
and the national communications plan. Similarly, providing messages and talking points to
states that implement demand response would be a component both of the communications
program and of technical assistance to states. For the sake of simplicity, action items are
listed under the statutory objective areas that are most closely related to each activity. Figure
1 illustrates the functional overlap between the three activity areas.
Figure 1: Functional Overlap in Some National Action Plan Activities
Given the overlap in technical assistance and tools and materials, we anticipate that not only
states but also customers, utilities, demand response providers, and other bodies and
institutions will be able to take advantage of the resources identified in the National Action
Plan. It should be noted that the degree to which all elements of the National Action Plan
are developed is heavily dependent on the level of funding and organization that the
Coalition achieves. The options presented in the following sections could be pursued more or
less aggressively than as they are currently described, depending on how these factors unfold
in the implementation phase of the National Action Plan.
To meet the three objectives in EISA, the National Action Plan will be applicable to a wide
range of demand response programs, products, and technologies, and it also will be applicable
to various stages of development and deployment of demand response implementation.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
23
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
12
Page 39 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
2.1 Technical Assistance to States
Introduction
Section 529 of EISA requires that the National Action Plan identify what technical
assistance 37 states need to maximize the amount of demand response resources that can be
developed and deployed. For the purposes of this National Action Plan, targets for state
assistance include governors, state regulators, state energy offices, state legislators, and state
consumer advocates. While the statute requires the National Action Plan to identify “the
requirements for technical assistance to States,” demand response activities of publicly owned
and cooperatively owned utilities do not generally fall under state commission jurisdiction.
Thus, providing technical assistance only to state agencies will not achieve the goals of
providing assistance to all governing bodies responsible for overseeing the provision of
electric service to all customers. Local officials governing publicly owned and cooperatively
owned utilities face challenges similar to those of state governing officials. Therefore, this
section’s discussion of most types of technical assistance is geared toward the needs of state
and local governing officials.
In many states, a variety of entities are already providing demand response resources. (See
Appendix B for examples.) These states tend to be those that have passed laws and/or
regulatory mandates or action plans that incorporate demand response in the energy policy
formation process. Often, these states (for example, Connecticut) have laid out a framework
for integrated resource planning that explicitly incorporates demand response as a resource. 38
In some states, RTOs and ISOs operate organized energy and capacity markets into which
demand response can be bid as a resource. Appendix B also lists current opportunities for
demand response to participate in RTO/ISO markets.
Several states have taken regulatory or legislative actions to encourage demand response and
energy efficiency. 39 For example, the Michigan Public Service Commission’s Michigan’s 21st
Century Energy Plan 40 and the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities’ Energy Master Plan 41 set
forth targets to reduce energy consumption and peak demand for the utilities and/or loadserving entities operating in those states. Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act, 42
37
FERC staff defines technical assistance to include, for example, the provision of information,
supporting research, funding, and onsite assistance.
38
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16a-3a (2008).
39
For example, see FERC Staff, 2009 Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering, at 12
(2009) (identifying the steps that states have taken to encourage demand response, such as
Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, New Mexico, Ohio, and Iowa’s adoption or enhancement of energy
efficiency resource standards that include demand response).
40
JP Lark, Michigan’s 21st Century Electric Energy Plan (2007), available at
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mpsc/21stcenturyenergyplan_185274_7.pdf.
41
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, New Jersey Energy Master Plan (2008), available at
http://www.state.nj.us/emp/docs/pdf/081022_emp.pdf.
42
2008 Mass. Acts 50 (amending Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 164B, § 116(a) (2009)).
24
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 40 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Maryland’s EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency Act of 2009, 43 and Pennsylvania’s Act
129 44 set goals for reductions in energy consumption and peak demand. In Colorado, the
legislature recently passed legislation that permits cooperative electric associations to
introduce inclining block rates for residential customers to promote energy efficiency. 45 In
Iowa, utilities are required to develop energy efficiency programs, 46 which include demand
response. 47
Many state and local governing officials and other key stakeholders (such as other demand
response providers and public power entities, including rural cooperatives and publicly
owned utilities) recognize the potential benefits of demand response programs, products,
technologies, and incentives and would like to increase participation and expand their
deployment. 48 However, as discussed at the FERC staff technical conference on November
19–20, 2009, inadequate training, time constraints, and staffing or resource limitations can
impede effective implementation and deployment of demand response programs. While
wholesale markets are seeing increasing participation by providers of demand response
resources, customers who participate in these programs are primarily in the commercial and
industrial sectors and represent a relatively small fraction of all retail customers.
Several organizations, such as load-serving entities, RTOs/ISOs, and other demand response
providers, are developing ways to enable demand response to be utilized more broadly as a
resource in energy, capacity, and ancillary services markets. These novel approaches will also
help foster the full deployment of AMI and dynamic pricing. In addition, they will release
competitive market forces to 1) develop more customer demand response and 2) plan for the
deployment of many innovative demand response applications that create greater consumer
control over energy usage and create new cost-saving opportunities for consumers.
43
2008 Md. Laws 131 (amending MD Code Ann., Pub. Util. Cos. § 7-211(b)(2) (2009)).
44
2008 Pa. Laws 129 (amending 66 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2806.1 (2009)).
45
S. 39, 67th Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. (Co. 2009) (amending Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-9.5-106(2)). (“A
cooperative electric association…establishes a graduated rate for increased energy consumption, for
energy conservation and energy efficiency purposes, by residential customers that is revenue-neutral
for the class…[and] shall give due consideration to the impact of such rates on low-income
customers.”)
46
Iowa Code § 476.6.16 (2009). See Iowa Utilities Board, Energy Efficiency in Iowa’s Electric and
Natural Gas Sectors, Report to the Iowa General Assembly (2009); Iowa Utilities Board, Overview of
Energy Efficiency Plans and Programs in Iowa (2009),
http://www.state.ia.us/government/com/util/energy/energy_efficiency.html.
47
“Energy efficiency programs include activities which lessen the amount of heating, cooling, or other
forms of work which must be performed, including but not limited to…direct and indirect load control,
time-of-use rates…,” Iowa Code § 476.6.16(c)(2) (2009) (existing code amended in 2008).
48
Several states have already implemented demand response programs, from which useful lessons can
be drawn. Appendix C discusses specific case studies of demand response programs and policies in
various states and regions.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
25
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 41 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Technical Assistance Actions
Section 529 of EISA requires that the National Action Plan identify the requirements for
technical assistance to states. Assistance to other entities — such as utility and non-utility
demand response providers and consumers — is discussed in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of this
document. The overall goal of technical assistance is to provide high-quality information and
research to states. States will use this information to make decisions regarding demand
response policy, regulation, and investments. Technical assistance can be provided by private
entities or by federal agencies. For instance, DOE currently gives states assistance that is
related to demand response as one of its many state electricity topics.
Establish a National Forum
Purpose
Give federal, state, and local leaders, as well as key stakeholders, a venue to
introduce the National Action Plan.
Expected
Outcome
Awareness of and support from policymakers for accomplishing the activities
identified in the National Action Plan.
As the first step in providing technical assistance under the National Action Plan, a federal
agency will sponsor a national forum on demand response that would be held for federal
agencies, state public utility commissioners, state energy offices, gubernatorial offices, state
legislators, state consumer counsels, utilities, other key stakeholders, and interested
consumers. Such a forum would provide a useful opportunity for the Coalition, to present the
overall vision of the National Action Plan to key decision-makers on demand response. The
national forum also would provide an opportunity to share ideas, examine barriers, and
explore solutions. Part of the National Forum could also be dedicated to developing an
organizational structure and leadership for the Coalition. 49
The forum would be a stand-alone, one-day session, likely in Washington, D.C., or following
another national conference (e.g., a meeting of NARUC). The forum also could be integrated
with existing third-party forums and meetings on demand response to leverage existing
infrastructure, marketing, and name recognition to attract broad participation. The national
forum also could take a blended approach that allows for in-person participation as well as
online participation, e.g., webcasting to reach the widest possible audience.
After the initial national forum, the Coalition would promote and develop a series of annual
meetings. The purpose of these meetings should be to review results that have been achieved,
share information on the latest developments in demand response, and continue the provision
of targeted assistance to states as needed. If annual meetings are determined to be useful, the
locations of these national meetings could rotate between regions (e.g., East Coast, Midwest,
West Coast) to foster greater in-person participation. If the forum is held once per year, the
49
26
Such a national forum on demand response was jointly conducted by FERC and DOE in February
2002.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 42 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
ideal time would be in the fall, when the results of summer demand response efforts would be
known. The forum would run no longer than two days. In addition, to maximize
participation, these meetings should be designed as webinars to encourage broad
participation.
Conduct Informational and Educational Sessions for Policymakers and
Regulators
Purpose
For state and federal regulators, legislators, and other policymakers to share
and learn about the attributes, uses, costs, and benefits of effective demand
response and opportunities to implement demand response.
Expected
Outcome
State and local governing officials are better prepared to implement demand
response.
Following the national forum, multiple regional and state sessions should be held, targeted to
a broader set of state employees, regulators, and other stakeholders. Regional and state
sessions may be more convenient for other interested retail regulators such as city councils
and rural cooperative boards. The objectives of the regional sessions would include those of
the national forum but also should seek to coordinate and implement applicable activities
proposed in the National Action Plan for the deployment of demand response in the region.
In addition, these regional and state sessions would be coordinated with existing regional
dialogues (e.g., efforts in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Pacific Northwest) funded by DOE
at the request of the states.
Regional sessions would allow more targeted discussion and input from state officials and
local utilities on demand response issues specific to each region — for example, demand
resource participation in wholesale organized markets in regions served by RTOs or ISOs, and
use of demand response to meet ancillary service needs associated with integration of
renewables. The sessions could address the various services provided by demand response
and the associated costs and potential benefits of demand response programs, products,
technologies, and incentives to the states and their electric customers. These sessions also
could help stakeholders develop strategies for deployment.
It is expected that the informational and educational sessions should promote knowledge and
skills related to:
•
The various services provided to enable demand response.
•
The associated costs and potential benefits of demand response programs.
•
Products, technologies, and incentives available to states and their electric
customers.
•
Strategies for deployment.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
27
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 43 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
Practical aspects of demand response implementation.
•
Just-in-time results and best practices from demand response implementation.
•
Relationship of demand response to the smart grid and the deployment of smart
meters.
•
Navigation of federal/state jurisdictional issues related to demand response.
The Coalition could sponsor these regional sessions and recruit speakers and facilitators for
these sessions. In addition to conducting the workshops, these speakers and facilitators
should be responsible for developing workshop materials and customizing these materials to
address specific regional and state issues.
Examples: Informational Sessions
CPUC and California Institute for
Energy and Environment
CPUC and the California Institute for Energy
and Environment have developed a series of
white papers on various behavioral topics
and conducted two-hour webinars to present
the papers and discuss the results. CPUC
funds the working papers and the Institute
selects the experts to prepare and present
the papers. Papers and presentations are
then posted to the Institute’s website.
http://uc-ciee.org/energyeff/energyeff.html
National Regulatory Research
Institute
The National Regulatory Research Institute
provides education sessions for various
topics, such as smart grid issues and
dynamic pricing. Slide decks and
information related to these presentations
are posted to their website.
http://www.nrri2.org/
28
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 44 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Build a Panel of Demand Response Experts
Purpose
Deliver lectures on and generate interest in demand response social and
technical topics at national and regional conferences; consult on demand
response programs and projects.
Expected
Outcome
Enhanced knowledge, skills, and attitudes of stakeholders regarding demand
response programs; technologies; markets; statutes; and/or ordinances,
benefits, and economics.
The Coalition would oversee the recruitment of experts to help inform various constituencies
about demand response programs, products, technologies, and incentives and their benefits.
These experts could be available as contacts for state and local governing officials during
policy development or regulatory proceedings. 50
The Coalition would establish an inventory of demand response industry technical experts.
One means to manage this panel would be through a Web-searchable database through
which states and other entities could identify a short list of experts for a specific topic. For
example, a user could use this database to find someone with expertise related to customer
education for small/medium commercial entities, or to find someone with expertise related to
automated demand response in aluminum manufacturing facilities.
The initial panel of experts could be developed by soliciting recommendations from the
federal agency, as well as Coalition members, and by identifying experts who have spoken at
industry conferences and published in relevant journals. Additional experts could then be
identified through recommendations from existing panelists. All experts would need to
disclose conflicts of interest, which is a best practice found in health-care-oriented
conferences and coalitions such as the American Public Health Association. To encourage
freedom of expression and diversity of thought, the messages communicated by experts
should flow freely. Therefore, the views presented by these experts should not be construed
to represent the opinion or policy of the federal agency or the Coalition.
The panel of experts could serve as a resource for state and local government officials as they
consider demand response programs. The experts should provide information about the types
of demand response programs and assist state and local government officials in assessing
demand response. In addition, experts could be speakers at events. The Coalition could
provide speakers through both “push” and “pull” methods. Push methods involve Coalition
members proactively recommending a panelist to participate in an event. Pull methods
reflect states or entities in need of panelists for events searching the panelist database
themselves to identify experts for speaking engagements, or asking the Coalition or federal
agency to recommend an appropriate expert. Regardless of the method, the entity sponsoring
50
These activities would be funded by the Coalition or other private entities rather than the federal
government.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
29
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 45 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
an event in which a panelist will participate would be responsible for selecting the
appropriate panelists for their event.
Sponsor Technical Papers
Purpose
Generate new knowledge or synthesize existing knowledge to inform state
officials about the design of demand response programs, products,
technologies, incentives, markets, and legislation.
Expected
Outcome
Peer-reviewed or similar-quality papers and their distribution through an online
database with clear summaries/abstracts.
Technical knowledge about demand response is underdeveloped, underfunded, limited in
scope, decentralized, disorganized, and in some cases proprietary and thus hidden from public
view. There exists no peer-reviewed journal for demand response research, no online
database of demand response research citations, and no shared agenda and prioritization for
ongoing demand response research. Published research is generally limited to trade press
(such as The Electricity Journal and Public Utilities Fortnightly), reports independently
developed by utilities and research organizations, and peer-reviewed journals that are not
specifically dedicated to demand-side issues (such as Energy, Energy Economics, Energy
Policy, The Energy Journal, The Journal of Regulatory Economics, and Utilities Policy).
Some state organizations such as the California Energy Commission’s Research, Development,
and Demonstration Division (formerly the Public Interest Energy Research program) set
research agendas, solicit proposals, and award funding (collected from public interest funds)
for research.
To promote the development of technical knowledge about demand response, the Coalition
would solicit information about the demand response topics that would possibly be helpful to
state officials and would oversee the development of a series of informational, technical,
research, or policy papers targeted to various practical aspects of demand response
implementation for the use of state officials. These papers could be disseminated through the
clearinghouse discussed in Section 2.3, though if the federal agency sponsors the
clearinghouse, various standards on objectivity and public interest filters would be applied.
Overall, the primary purpose of the technical papers would be to highlight and address
questions that require new research to address barriers to demand response.
The Coalition and its stakeholders would develop and prioritize topics of interest. The
Coalition and its stakeholders could solicit research proposals from national laboratories,
academic institutions, utilities, independent researchers, consultants, and other entities.
Subject to available funding, the Coalition or the federal agency may be able to award funding
to proposals that have merit. If the federal government sponsors any technical papers
identified by the Coalition, attention will focus on avoiding conflicts of interest, because
members of the Coalition may have financial interests in the message developed. Proposal
solicitation should embrace both primary (original) research and secondary (meta-analysistype) research, with an emphasis on the latter to bring forward existing proprietary research
30
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 46 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
commissioned by utilities. There also could be crossover between a demand response
research agenda and an energy efficiency research agenda (for example, in the socialbehavioral area), so there should be an attempt to align research with these other areas and to
coordinate with existing research efforts. For example, a number of utilities receiving smart
grid investment grants from DOE have proposed consumer behavior studies as part of their
smart grid/demand response rollouts.
Some potential research topics that may assist states in addressing information gaps are
identified in the discussion of the national communications program, and some are listed in
Appendix A, where they are divided into two categories: social science 51 research issues or
technical issues. The Coalition and its stakeholders would work to prioritize these topics,
identify additional topics, and select a subset as candidates for further research.
Establish a Program for Technical Assistance for Demand Response
Purpose
Provide support to states for implementing demand response.
Expected
Outcome
Demand response expertise is provided to states requesting assistance in the
development and deployment of any and all forms of demand response.
The provision of research and technical support in response to state requests is a core activity
in any effort to provide technical assistance to states. DOE has provided federal support for
this type of technical assistance for many years. As part of their support, DOE supports
research and technical assistance activities to ISOs, utilities, and state and regional
policymakers that support and enhance the development of demand response programs,
technologies, services infrastructure, and dynamic pricing tariffs.
This activity involves establishing a program under which qualifying state agencies (e.g., state
regulatory commissions or state energy offices), consumer advocacy groups, and utilities may
apply for specific virtual or onsite technical assistance with demand response implementation.
Subject to available funding, the federal government or the Coalition could oversee the
provision of appropriate technical assistance to stakeholders. The nature of this assistance
could range from referring a caller to a website, to providing the applicable reference
material, to providing onsite technical help (for a day, a week, or longer). This program could
also provide assistance to help states navigate federal/state jurisdictional issues related to
demand response. The program would be coordinated with ongoing DOE technical assistance
programs.
The technical help could be provided through a number of avenues, including the following:
•
51
Staff of a federal office.
Social science research focuses on customer interest in demand response and how customers change
their consumption or behavior in response to demand response programs or dynamic pricing.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
31
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 47 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
National laboratory staff.
•
Entities specializing in operational and dispatch algorithms to allow demand
response to be incorporated as a resource, similar to generation resources.
•
Funding for lead staff from a state that has successfully implemented a particular
demand response program to travel to, and inform, another state developing a
similar program.
•
Entities specializing in demand response communications and marketing.
•
Support for the NARUC-FERC Smart Response Collaborative.
•
Other knowledgeable individuals.
Provide Demand Response Grants
Purpose
Provide funding for demand response innovations (subject to available
funding).
Expected
Outcome
Innovative solutions to demand response problems.
Some states provide grants through regulatory entities — for example, the California Energy
Commission’s Research, Development, and Demonstration Division (which administers $83.5
million in public interest energy research funds). The California grant program focuses on
developing and implementing commercially available demand response programs. In
addition, DOE is using American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Recovery Act) 52 funds to
support the deployment of many demand response technologies, programs, pilots, and
demonstrations, as well as studies of customer behavior response. These grants will entail
very extensive data collection and reporting, available publicly on the Internet through
www.smartgrid.gov, and will provide a wealth of information that state regulatory authorities
can use to make future decisions about demand response-related investments.
The purpose of providing demand response grants would be to fund additional and targeted
development of demand response at the state level through pilots, implementation, and
evaluation of demand response innovations. This evaluation would be designed to build on
and leverage the activities funded at the state level and through the Recovery Act. Because
innovations can emerge from a variety of sources, states or other legal entities, public or
private, should be eligible to apply for a grant. Also, many states are not structured for
distributing grants, so another entity would need to provide funding and oversight of the
grant review process. Reviewers could evaluate and score grants based on criteria established
by the Coalition. For instance, the criteria could favor programs, products, services, and
technologies that have the potential for maximum, sustained deployment of cost-effective
52
32
Pub. L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009).
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 48 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
demand response. Other criteria could include significant potential as established by
scientific evidence, work in untested areas with strong potential, compliance with existing
standards, and novel demand response applications that address climate change issues. Once
grant winners are announced, an entity that has an existing grants administration
infrastructure, working in conjunction with the Coalition, would oversee the relationship
with the grantee, from award to final report.
Examples: Grant Programs
DOE’s SBIR/STTR Program
Each year (typically around the beginning of
October), DOE issues a solicitation inviting small
businesses to apply for SBIR/STTR Phase I
grants. This program covers technical topics in
such research areas as energy production
(fossil, nuclear, renewable, and fusion energy),
energy use (in buildings, vehicles, and
industry), fundamental energy sciences
(materials, life, environmental, and
computational sciences and nuclear and high
energy physics), environmental management,
and nuclear nonproliferation. Grant applications
submitted by small businesses must respond to
a specific topic and subtopic during an open
solicitation.
http://www.er.doe.gov/sbir/
California Energy Commission
The California Energy Commission's Research,
Development, and Demonstration (RD&D)
Division supports public interest energy
research, development, and demonstration.
RD&D activities include providing contracts and
grants for research and development of energy
technologies and related scientific activities.
The RD&D Division administers a total of $83.5
million in public interest energy research funds
annually — $62.5 million for electricity and $21
million for natural gas.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/research/index.html
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
33
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 49 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
2.2 National Communications Program
Introduction
Section 529 of EISA requires that the National Action Plan on Demand Response design and
identify requirements for implementation of a national communications program that
includes broad-based customer education and support. This section describes the design of,
and identifies the requirements for, a national communications program that includes three
elements: a Communications Umbrella; local implementation; and direct outreach to states,
policymakers, and national partners regarding demand response communications programs
and opportunities.
A national communications program should be multifaceted to facilitate widespread
acceptance and implementation of demand response to achieve the highest potential peak
load reduction identified in the National Assessment. To account for the various approaches
undertaken and considered for demand response implementation by states and localities, a
national communications program would not be a single, national effort to educate all
consumers at the same time, through a single channel and with the same message; rather, the
national communications program would take a more tiered, localized approach that educates
customers, as appropriate to each locality. A national communications program also must be
highly adaptable and scalable to individual states, utilities, load-serving entities, and other
demand response providers, without taking a top-down or one-size-fits-all approach.
Simultaneously, the program would benefit from the coordinated research and insight that
only a nationwide program can provide. It would not dictate a single message, which may
not apply to all customers or electricity stakeholders; instead, it would provide a framework
of messages that universally appeals to customers, but that can be employed in part or whole
— as deemed appropriate by local demand response implementers — to each region, state, or
locality.
Accordingly, this national communications plan provides the roadmap for a communications
program that will educate residential, commercial, and industrial electricity customers, and
support those customers as well as electricity providers, regulators, policymakers, and all
others involved in implementing demand response programs. Designing the plan as a flexible
roadmap for the national communications program enables communications around a variety
of applications.
These applications include incorporating price-responsive demand,
automating demand response in all hours of the day, using demand response to provide
operating reserves and other ancillary services, and partnering demand response with wind
generation and other variable renewable resources.
This plan for a national communications program reflects the input of a broad range of
industry stakeholders received through extensive outreach, a staff technical conference, and
formally filed comments in response to the Discussion Draft and the Draft National Action
Plan.
34
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 50 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The multifaceted structure of the national communications program would mean that it
would develop and support communications through multiple channels and media to
communicate as appropriate with the many audiences for demand response. The national
communications program would provide broad-based customer education and support though
coordinated national and local action. At the national level, the program would develop a
Communications Umbrella to provide the research-based message framework,
communications tools, support, and advice, as requested, to local demand response
implementers.
In addition, the Coalition would oversee direct outreach and educational programs at the
national level to states, policymakers, and national partners to build support for demand
response. By communicating with states, policymakers, and national partners, the national
communications program would help build support for demand response in areas where there
are no existing demand response programs or current plans to implement such programs.
At the local level, the national communications program should include an implementation
strategy to inform residential and commercial customers about the availability and possible
benefits of demand response programs, products, technologies, and incentives. Interested
local demand response implementers would use the research-based message framework and
communications tools and tactics developed at the national level to tailor messages and
materials to conduct their own outreach to their particular customers. Local implementation
includes demand response provided in regional RTO/ISO markets, states, and localities. The
local implementation strategy would have two components: a demonstration program
approach and support for other demand response programs. Under the demonstration
program approach, local demand response implementers could volunteer to participate as
demonstration programs to receive “hands-on” implementation message support and tactical
advice. The demonstration programs could thereafter serve as successful program models or
case studies that could then further inform the national message framework.
The other component of local implementation should be support for other demand response
programs. Local demand response implementers would not need to participate as
demonstration programs to utilize resources developed at the national level. Local
stakeholders who wish to take a more autonomous approach to demand response
implementation, using only certain communications tools or resources as they determine
appropriate, would fall into this category but would otherwise have access to the same
message framework and tactical implementation recommendations as would demonstration
programs. All local demand response implementers could access available toolkit materials to
supplement their demand response efforts. As discussed later in this section, these materials
would be customizable so that implementers could modify and tailor them to meet their
particular needs and achieve their specific objectives. By targeting the program at the local,
regional, and state levels, the communications messages would be more effective, and
feedback on what works best could be used to influence the national effort.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
35
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 51 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Figure 2 shows the proposed national communications program structure, outlining the
program and message development tasks to be overseen by the Coalition in the
Communications Umbrella. The research and messages developed in the Communications
Umbrella would then be used to 1) support local demand response implementers involved in
demonstration programs and other demand response programs and 2) reach out to states,
policymakers, and national partners to educate them about demand response. Later in this
section, the structure and elements of the national communications program are discussed
more extensively.
Figure 2: Program Structure
Figure 3 shows the approximate sequence in which major tasks would be undertaken,
indicating the overlap between some tasks and the ongoing nature of many. The diagram
indicates that certain tasks, such as communications with states and policymakers, would
occur over a long duration, while other tasks, such as foundational customer research and
message development, would be more limited in duration in the initial stages (though
possibly repeated at a later time if warranted). Multiple tasks would occur concurrently
based both on their priority level and on the steps that must occur prior to each stage of the
rollout.
36
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 52 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Figure 3: Program Development and Rollout Sequence Over Time
Challenges in Designing a National Communications Program
The national communications program could face several challenges. First, no single
nationwide demand response program is currently in place. Many different demand response
programs, products, technologies, and incentives are being considered or implemented.
Customer knowledge pertaining to demand response also varies greatly. In addition, because
demand response implementation varies depending on the circumstances faced in various
regions, it may be difficult and inappropriate to develop a “one-size-fits-all” message. 53 Other
challenges that a national communications program must consider include the diversity of
stakeholder interests, the lack of broad-based knowledge about customer perceptions and
motivations, the various energy initiatives competing for customers’ attention and funding,
and the degree of receptivity to demand response and technical assistance among local
entities. A national mass media campaign directly targeting residential and small commercial
customers could be undertaken, depending on the availability of financial resource. 54
Based on these challenges, the Coalition should initially focus on supporting local
implementation efforts through national research and coordination rather than by initiating a
national mass media campaign. By supporting local efforts, the program would ensure that
resources are spent to reach customers only when demand response programs are available to
them. This feature helps ensure that a national communications program does not expose
53
For example, in some localities, the action step for the customer might be, “You need to do nothing,”
if an opt-out program is implemented that gives the utility, load-serving entity, or other demand
response provider the ability to override the end-user’s air conditioning controls; for other customers,
the action step might be, “Look for price signals, and then manually turn your air conditioner to a
higher temperature,” if their utilities, load-serving entities, or other demand response providers
introduce opt-in dynamic pricing.
54
Large commercial and industrial customers have greater awareness and knowledge about energy
issues; therefore, a mass media campaign may not be appropriate for these customers.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
37
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 53 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
customers to confusing or conflicting messages, because local utilities, load-serving entities,
other demand response providers, governors, state energy offices, and public utility
commissions would serve as the chief communicators, and new messages would only
supplement their current communications, not supplant them. By reaching out only to
customers who, according to research, are receptive and can act on the information, the
program will be more likely to be effective. However, this discussion should not been seen as
limiting future efforts to reach more customers using the lessons learned from the National
Action Plan effort.
Objectives of the National Communications Program
With these challenges in mind, the national communications program has the following
objectives:
•
•
Increase commercial and residential electricity customers’ awareness and
understanding of demand response as it relates to other smart energy use principles
such as energy conservation, energy efficiency, and the smart grid. (Research and
outreach have shown that many large industrial customers are already largely aware
of the potential benefits of demand response as well as how to implement demand
response initiatives.)
•
Provide information to relevant states and policymakers (including, but not limited
to, state and local governing officials, such as state legislators) about the potential
benefits and costs associated with demand response, including peak reduction and
ancillary services to reliably integrate variable resources.
•
Inform policymakers about the potential benefits of having a demand response
program that could complement their smart grid, renewable energy, and
environmental goals.
•
Inform renewable resource developers of the benefits of “partnering” with demand
response to improve reliability and provide needed ancillary services.
•
Support local utility, load-serving entity and other demand response providers’
activities that inform customers about the potential opportunities, benefits, and costs
of demand response and thereby engender customer support and participation in
demand response in their local programs.
•
38
Increase electricity customers’ awareness and understanding of their energyconsuming behavior and the means to adjust their consumption to realize the most
economical use of electricity.
Establish measurable goals to meet the national communication program’s objective
of broad-based customer education and support. The development of these goals
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
12
Page 54 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
would be coordinated by the Coalition, with benchmarks to facilitate program
evaluation and accountability.
•
Address concerns about negative effects on low-income, elderly, and disabled
customers.
National Communications Program Structure
The national communications program would function as a forum for communications
development and as a supporter and resource for regional and local outreach to residential,
commercial, and industrial customers. By compiling research on existing communications
and marketing programs across the country and internationally, and conducting foundational
research among electricity customers, the Communications Umbrella approach would be used
to develop a message framework that local utilities, load-serving entities, and other demand
response providers could employ at the local level. It would not take a top-down approach.
Rather, it would look to the experience and best practices of local demand response
implementers as the foundation of the Communications Umbrella approach, and conduct
research only after understanding customers’ existing base of knowledge. Foundational
customer research and analysis of the existing body of research would then proceed
concurrently.
This national communications plan outlines the specific roadmap for the national
communications program that includes broad-based customer education and support. This
program would have the following structural elements:
Communications Umbrella
•
Program development
•
Message framework development
Local Implementation
•
Support for demonstration programs
•
Support for other demand response programs
Direct Outreach
•
Communications assistance to states and policymakers
•
Partnership development
Each of these elements will be discussed in further detail below.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
39
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 55 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Communications Umbrella
Purpose
Provide a consistent communications program message framework, based on
research conducted as part of the National Action Plan and additional, publicly
available research and case studies that can be tailored to meet the unique
needs of localities, states, and regions. Provide a well-researched strategic
framework for communicating about demand response in localities, states,
and regions.
Expected
Outcome
A body of customer research, a clear message framework, customizable
message and communications materials, and a strategic communications
roadmap for demand response implementation.
A Communications Umbrella would provide a foundation for successful future
communications about demand response, by leading the way on market research, creating a
message framework, and providing outreach strategies and tactics on which to base national,
regional, state, and local communications efforts. Figure 4 illustrates this relationship.
Figure 4: Interaction Between the Communications Umbrella and Local
Implementation
The Communications Umbrella would create a consistent message framework that local
demand response implementers (especially utilities, load-serving entities, and other demand
response providers) can customize and use to develop their own message and materials. More
specifically, the Communications Umbrella would:
1. Provide communications support and advice to local demand response implementers
as new or enhanced demand response programs, markets, and products are
developed at the local, state, and regional level, as discussed in greater detail later in
this section.
40
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 56 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
2. Develop a consistent message framework based on foundational market research
conducted and compiled through the National Action Plan that utilities, loadserving entities, or other demand response providers and stakeholders can
independently tailor to their own local audiences to foster greater demand response
participation and to supplement their existing communications with customers.
Messages could include information on the versatility of demand response resources
for a variety of applications beyond lowering peak demand, such as automating
demand response at all hours of the day, using demand response to provide
operating reserves and other ancillary services, and partnering demand response
with wind generation and other variable renewable resources.
3. Give local demand response implementers the information they need to disseminate
communications locally to residential and small commercial customers in areas that
are implementing new or improved demand response programs, products,
technologies, and incentives.
4. Leverage the success of the demonstration programs to spread information and
successful program and product models that can be replicated in areas that plan to
implement demand response in the near term.
5. Eventually disseminate communications to all localities, states, and regions as
opportunities for demand response become more widespread.
The Communications Umbrella would focus on three target groups: 1) states, policymakers,
and national partners who will make decisions about demand response implementation; 2)
local demonstration program sites that have implemented or are implementing demand
response and wish to have hands-on assistance in their outreach to customers; and 3) other
demand response programs, including programs that are implementing demand response and
wish to be fully autonomous in their communications with customers. The program would
be most effective if it first helps stakeholders build decision-maker support and technical
capacity for demand response implementation, then educates residential and small
commercial customers through integrated communications in the localities and states that
adopt demand response programs or where regional markets for demand response exist.
Education would be conducted both in partnership with local demonstration program sites
and by providing support materials to any sites that are not demonstration sites but want to
implement demand response or supplement existing communications.
The responsibilities of the Communications Umbrella fall into two subsets: program
development and message framework development. Communications Umbrella program
development would involve compiling case studies and successful outreach tactics,
identifying demonstration program sites, and conducting program evaluation. Message
framework development involves conducting both a scan of existing research and new,
foundational market research; developing adaptable customer-friendly messages; positioning
demand response as a component of smart energy use; developing communications materials
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
41
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 57 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
and toolkits; and developing support materials tailored to large commercial and industrial
customers. As explained previously in Figure 4, some of these tasks will occur concurrently.
Program Development
The Communications Umbrella would first study how local entities have communicated
about demand response implementation across the country and internationally. This step
might include messages, focus group feedback, advertisements, and other components. From
there, the Coalition would oversee the selection of demonstration program sites from among
those states, local load-serving entities, utilities, and other demand response providers that
have requested support and — once their work begins — evaluate their success.
Compile case studies
Though several entities have already compiled some data on demand response program
implementation, 55 there is no single repository for customer research, message testing,
behavioral data, and the like. The Coalition would oversee the collection of such
nonproprietary data from as many sources as possible, given resource availability, and would
make the data available through the Web-based clearinghouse, as discussed in Section 2.3.
The best practices compiled through the clearinghouse would aid local programs in their own
implementation efforts and, more importantly, inform the foundational customer research.
Identify demonstration program sites
Identifying demonstration program sites or markets is essential to the structure of the
Communications Umbrella development process whereby the results, experiences, and
successes in one location provide input and feedback to inform others. The Coalition would
oversee the development of a method for choosing sites from a pool of applicants; it would
consider factors such as the willingness of local stakeholders to be vocal demand response
leaders, the receptivity of local customers to participate in programs, and the availability of
local resources that can be used to fund communications related to demand response.
Demonstration programs will be discussed more fully in the “Local Implementation” section.
Conduct program evaluation
The Coalition would oversee the development of metrics to evaluate the impact of particular
outreach tactics and adjust the best practices and recommendations moving forward.
Message Framework Development
The Communications Umbrella would develop the broad message framework and outreach
strategies for the national communications program, which could then be customized by local
55
42
Entities that have already begun compiling data and research from existing demand response
programs include the Peak Load Management Alliance and the Demand Response Coordinating
Committee, among others.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 58 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
stakeholders. For example, as discussed below, the Communications Umbrella could provide
a template one-page message document outlining to customers what demand response is and
how it impacts them, and stakeholders would have the ability to edit the document, change
the wording as necessary for their circumstances, and add their own program logos to it, as
well as reformat it entirely or use only part of it in their other communications with
customers.
Conduct foundational market research
Foundational market research would be used to develop a nationally consistent message
framework for demand response, similar to the ENERGY STAR® program. 56 The national
message framework would facilitate customers’ understanding of demand response and its
possible benefits. Regardless of the eventual funding level available for implementation of
the National Action Plan, foundational market research should be considered a priority item,
because it would inform the national communications program of the most effective demand
response messages and outreach tactics. Additionally, numerous stakeholders commented
that conducting foundational market research should be a high priority for the national
communications program.
As a starting point, research would look at the success or failure of existing demand response
programs and identify lessons learned. It would also involve original research with
residential and commercial electricity customers to identify which incentives and messages
each customer class would find most persuasive to modify their energy usage. Much of this
research would be relevant nationwide. However, research would also help to identify how
best to tailor the messages to account for regional differences in the structure of electricity
markets, critical peak periods, demand response program design, pricing models, and
structure of utilities.
Formative research would help in assessing customer assumptions and understanding of key
issues, conscious behavior, and what motivates customers to change their behavior. This
foundational market research could include quantitative surveys of residential, commercial,
and industrial customers, as well as qualitative research such as focus groups in numerous
locations across the country and among varying customer classes. Key research questions that
could be explored include:
•
•
56
How might messages be tailored to reach different classes of potential demand
response customers with different demand response capabilities?
What messages are most effective to help customers understand what demand
response is?
ENERGY STAR® is a joint voluntary labeling program of EPA and DOE that is designed to identify and
promote energy-efficient products to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For more information about
the program, visit http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=home.index.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
43
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 59 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
What messages are most effective to help customers understand demand response’s
benefits?
•
What level of understanding of demand response do customers need in order to
participate? Do they need to understand the concept fully, or is it enough to give
them easy tools and instructions and inform them of demand response’s potential
benefits ?
•
Are financial incentives such as electric bill savings or rebates the most powerful
motivators?
•
Are customers more inclined to change their behavior if they learn that reducing
peak demand helps the environment? For example, is there a difference in response
between paying a customer not to consume (but no penalty if they continue to
consume) and building in a discount that the customer surrenders if they do not
respond (peak time rebate vs. critical peak pricing (CPP))?
•
How much inconvenience are customers willing to endure if their provider asks
them to be part of a demand response program or product?
•
Who should broadcast the demand response event for it to have maximum impact?
•
Do messages that promote energy efficiency or energy conservation conflict with or
support demand response messages?
•
Do customers react differently to messages that talk about demand response as
preventing crises versus messages that frame it as a purely positive step as we
increase the use of renewable energy sources?
Customers’ answers would help the national communications program shape its messages in
all outreach support materials and ensure that the right messengers deliver those messages.
In addition, having the answers to these and other research questions would benefit entities
interested in investing in demand response programs, products, technologies, incentives, and
infrastructure.
Foundational customer research would also provide insight on the effectiveness of linking the
concept of demand response to other smart energy use concepts (e.g., state renewable
portfolio standards, climate change, energy efficiency, regional markets, smart grid),
compared with the effectiveness of educating customers about demand response as a wholly
separate concept in order to achieve peak use reductions.
Finally, the research would help to determine the best market segments to target to achieve
the greatest behavioral shifts for the lowest cost. Because virtually every person and every
business uses electricity, the potential audience for this program is the entire adult
population, which would be prohibitively expensive for any program to reach. Therefore,
44
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 60 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
“zeroing in” on smaller groups would help to ensure efficient message delivery and avoid
wasting time and resources on audiences who are unlikely to change their behavior. 57 This
knowledge would inform the overall strategic and tactical recommendations developed
through the Communications Umbrella for use by local programs.
Develop adaptable, customer-friendly messages
The majority of stakeholder comments stated that “demand response” is not a customerfriendly term. Another objective of the Communications Umbrella would be to reframe
demand response with new, more customer-friendly terminology that would better explain
the concepts of energy use reduction, load shifting, and managing energy usage in response to
price or non-price signals, in conjunction with other smart energy use principles. The
Coalition would oversee research to help determine the terminology that best conveys to
customers what demand response is and how it can benefit them.
In addition to reframing the demand response concept, the Communications Umbrella would
develop a message framework with persuasive, adaptable messages aimed at various audience
segments, all of which could be tailored by interested local stakeholders. The program would
segment the audience into discrete groups based on their varying motivations and
circumstances, and messages would differ slightly for each segment. Messages must first
define the problem that demand response programs could help to resolve; messages could
then establish the urgent need for demand response implementation and explain appropriate
ways to modify behavior. How best to communicate the problem and its solution may vary
by audience. To simplify this notion, Table 1 provides examples of message categories for
diverse audiences. The Coalition would oversee the development of messages for various
audience segments within the message framework, with research providing insight into the
most persuasive ways to convey the content listed in the Table. 58
57
For example, the California Statewide Pricing Pilot found that residential, medium commercial and
industrial, and large commercial and industrial customers are more responsive to dynamic rates than
are small commercial and industrial customers in the absence of automating technologies. See
Charles River Associates, Impact Evaluation of the California Statewide Pricing Pilot (2005), available
at
http://sites.energetics.com/madri/toolbox/pdfs/pricing/cra_2005_impact_eval_ca_pricing_pilot.pdf.
58
Note that the technical assistance would help to provide the underlying factual basis for the content of
the message.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
45
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 61 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Table 1: Segmentation of Message Framework
Audience/“Who”
Message
Content/“What”
Messenger
Delivery/“When”
Key stakeholders
Be a part of the Coalition
that will lead the demand
response program
Federal/state/
local governments,
utilities/loadserving entities/
other demand
response
providers,
RTOs/ISOs/
commercial and
industrial
customers,
consumer
advocates,
existing coalitions
of these
organizations
Immediately/
continually (as
outreach begins in
new states)
All stakeholder
leadership
Implement your demand
response goals with our
support
Coalition
Short-term/ongoing
Stakeholder
leadership in
states, localities,
and regions with
demand response
We can support and
supplement your efforts
with technical and
communications assistance
Coalition
Short-term/ongoing
(continually as new
states adopt
demand response)
Stakeholder
leadership in
states, localities,
and regions
receptive to
demand response
Implement demand
response with our support;
once implemented, we can
support and supplement
your efforts
Coalition
Short-term,
medium-term,
long-term
Stakeholder
leadership in nondemand response
states
Look at success in other
states and localities as a
potential roadmap; we can
help you achieve your
unique goals
Coalition
Medium-term, longterm (continually as
success stories and
best practices
emerge)
State and local
governing officials
Support customer interest
in implementing and
receiving benefits of
demand response
Coalition
Short-term/ongoing
Utilities, loadserving entities,
and other demand
response providers
Use our support to
communicate with
customers and provide
additional sources of
ancillary services and tools
to reliably integrate
variable resources
Coalition
Short-term/ongoing
46
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 62 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Message
Content/“What”
Messenger
Delivery/“When”
Large commercial
and industrial
customers
Implement demand
response because it can
provide widespread
benefits, save you money,
and be directly beneficial
to you as a participant in
wholesale markets
Coalition,
utilities/loadserving entities,
public utility
commissions,
other demand
response providers
Short-term/ongoing
Current residential
and commercial
customers with
access to demand
response
programs
Join the program because
it can provide widespread
benefits (e.g., you could
earn a cash rebate, protect
our power supply, and
promote the use of clean
energy)
Utilities/loadserving entities,
public utility
commissions,
Coalition, other
demand response
providers
Medium-term, longterm (continual rollout as new states
and localities adopt
demand response)
Low-income,
elderly, and
disabled
customers with
access to demand
response
programs
Join the program because
it will provide you with
benefits (it could save you
money and could protect
your power supply) and
will not raise your costs or
hurt your quality of life
Utilities/loadserving entities,
public utility
commissions,
Coalition, other
demand response
providers
Medium-term, longterm (continual rollout as new states
and localities adopt
demand response)
Future customers
Demand response is an
important way to reduce
energy use during peak
periods, protect the
environment, and promote
the use of clean energy
Coalition, utilities,
load-serving
entities, schools,
other demand
response providers
Medium-term, longterm
Customer
advocates
Support demand response
nationwide because of its
widespread benefits (e.g.,
less need for future power
plants, safer power supply,
potential money savings)
Coalition, other
demand response
providers
Short-term/ongoing
Renewable
resource
developers
Partner with demand
response for ancillary
services
Coalition
Short-term,
medium-term,
long-term
Audience/“Who”
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
47
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 63 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The Communications Umbrella would develop comprehensible, research-based messages
aimed at the audience segments outlined above. It would also craft messages that would
increase awareness, encourage customers to modify how they consume electricity, and assist
customers that want to participate in available demand response programs.
For example, when addressing residential customers in areas with available demand response
programs, products, or markets, a generic message framework might inform them about the
following topics:
•
Variability of electric prices and sources. Inform customers that the cost of
generating electricity varies by time. During “peak periods” when there is high
electricity demand, electricity is more expensive to produce. Also inform customers
about which generation sources are used by time of day and during peak periods.
•
Urgency of demand response. Communicate the urgency of the need for demand
response, load shifting, energy efficiency, energy conservation, etc.
•
Actions to take. Educate customers about specific actions they could take at critical
peak periods to reduce electricity use, and publicize the potential benefits of
participating in demand response. These messages would highlight the importance
and value of taking action by tying that action to the most effective customer
motivations, such as potential electricity bill savings or environmental benefits.
•
Minimizing negative impacts. Provide reassurance to customers that any negative
consequences of demand response implementation have been anticipated and would
not pose a threat to them. These messages would lessen customers’ concerns and
prevent customer backlash, in concert with messages about the need for demand
response, the specific actions to take, and the benefits of taking them.
When addressing large commercial and industrial customers, the message framework might
inform them about:
•
Compensation. Inform customers that their actions can not only reduce bills, but, in
some parts of the country, also result in compensation opportunities.
•
Opportunities. Educate large commercial customers about the role they may be able
to play by participating in local utility programs or in regional markets (such as
participating in demand response programs that could help to integrate variable
energy resources like wind generation into the system), if applicable.
Foundational research, message testing, and Coalition input will help to determine whether
these messages or others are appropriate and whether they motivate customers to change
their behavior.
48
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 64 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The Communications Umbrella also could work with a sampling of local demand response
implementers to develop messages to educate customers about specific actions they could take
at critical peak periods to reduce electricity use.
The intended outcome of the message development and testing process is to create a message
framework that local stakeholders can adopt to communicate with customers, or that they
can use to supplement or modify their own communications.
Following the finalization of the message framework, the Communications Umbrella would
develop template advertising materials — including a template TV advertisement, a template
radio advertisement, a template online advertisement, a template print advertisement, and
template direct mail — that local stakeholders could use in their outreach efforts. To save on
costs, the materials could be designed so that they would be produced once but still be
customizable with graphics and website URLs for a specific state, load-serving entity, utility,
or other demand response provider’s demand response program.
Position demand response as part of overall smart energy use
A core question in the development of messages for the program is how best to position
demand response in relation to other smart energy use concepts, such as renewable energy,
load shifting, energy conservation, energy efficiency, and smart grid. Which relationship best
aids customer understanding? In addition, messages should consider providing linkages to
known, evolving, and emerging technologies (e.g., automated demand response such as AutoDR for commercial and industrial facilities) and opportunities in retail and wholesale energy
markets. Anecdotal market research to date shows that consumers already confuse these
concepts of energy conservation and energy efficiency, so positioning demand response as a
new twist on existing concepts may create further confusion. Though foundational customer
research would provide the best insight, it may be necessary to link demand response with
other smart energy use principles to increase customer understanding, or even to use other
smart energy use terms to describe demand response.
Linking the concept of demand response with other smart energy practices would provide a
strategic framework to integrate the education and promotion of demand response with other
federal government or state-based initiatives to educate customers on smart energy use or
sustainable energy conservation practices. For example, under the ENERGY STAR®
program, DOE and EPA jointly market cost-effective opportunities for customers to receive
the same level of service by using fewer kilowatt-hours of electricity, saving money and
reducing carbon emissions.
The Coalition could work with existing renewable energy, energy efficiency, smart grid, and
other related initiatives to oversee the development a comprehensive message. Doing so
could persuade customers to take action and alter their energy use patterns, while meeting
the communications objectives of each of the individual programs.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
49
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 65 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Develop communications materials, tactics, and toolkits
To support all stakeholders implementing demand response initiatives, the Communications
Umbrella would develop a suite of toolkit materials that stakeholders could use to create their
own customized communications programs or to supplement local communications. Toolkit
materials (explained in greater detail in the “Support for Other Demand Response Programs”
section) would include message research data and analysis, guidance on demand response
messages, strategies and tactics for effective audience targeting and outreach, and
customizable advertisements and other communications materials.
Develop support materials tailored to large commercial and industrial customers
Residential and small commercial customers are a very important part of the audience for
demand response, and reaching this audience segment effectively would have the greatest
positive impact on broad public opinion surrounding demand response. But effective
communications to residential and small commercial customers cannot begin until demand
response programs, products, technologies, and incentives are in place in their states or
localities.
Unlike residential customers, large commercial and industrial customers generally have
greater awareness and knowledge about energy and actions that can be taken to adjust their
electricity consumption. In addition, both retail and wholesale demand response programs
are already available in many places throughout the country in which these customers may
participate. Because of this greater sophistication on energy issues, existing program
availability, and the likely cost-effectiveness of these programs, outreach efforts to these
customers could result in immediate benefits associated with demand response participation
by this sector.
Working at the national and local levels, depending on the customer, the Coalition would
coordinate outreach to large companies to inform them about demand response and available
opportunities to provide it. This outreach would showcase how demand response can be
made available through distinct messages and template materials geared toward large-scale
customers.
The Coalition would work with state and local stakeholders to provide materials about best
practices and model program guides that would help large customers participate in demand
response programs offered by a utility, load-serving entity, other demand response providers,
or RTO/ISO markets. Template slide show presentations could be used to inform customers
and enlist their support. A template press release could be customized to congratulate and
thank large commercial and industrial customers for investing in demand response.
50
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 66 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Local Implementation
Support for Demonstration Programs
Purpose
Advise states and localities on communications best practices as they adapt
the Communications Umbrella to increase exposure of and participation in
demand response in their own localities. Provide logistical support and
coordination for communications around local demand response
implementation.
Expected
Outcome
Tailored communications that integrate the broad, national messages with the
local program’s needs and unique characteristics.
A core element of the national communications program is the implementation of a broad
strategic and message framework through a local demonstration program approach.
This local implementation demonstration program approach would first roll out in areas that
have requested the national communications program’s support and have already
implemented or are on the verge of implementing pilot or full-scale demand response
programs and products. The demonstration program approach would then spread (as
requested) to areas that plan to implement programs and products in the near term, and
would eventually become national in scope as implementation becomes more widespread.
The national communications program could coordinate with DOE’s Recovery Act stimulus
grants. For instance, several of the recipients of the stimulus grants will be conducting
controlled experiments of the response to the smart metering and dynamic pricing. These
experiments could serve as examples within the demonstration program approach.
Using broad, nationally developed messages, the Communications Umbrella would advise
local load-serving entities, utilities, and other demand response providers that have agreed to
participate and have been selected as demonstration programs on how to translate the
Communications Umbrella messages and strategies to their own local demand response
initiatives, seasonal peak load patterns, and any other regional factors.
The strategy for communicating messages around local demand response implementation is
an integrated communications program, not reliant on one particular communication method
or medium. The integrated marketing elements supported by the national communications
program for a sample demonstration program could include:
•
Public relations. An important tactical component of a local communications
program would be a comprehensive news media outreach and public relations
strategy. This strategy would build public and policymaker support for demand
response in conjunction with direct communications outreach to states and
policymakers (discussed later in the Direct Outreach to States, Policymakers, and
Partners subsection) and the technical assistance to states discussed in Section 2.1. It
would also educate customers by garnering news coverage about demand response.
By communicating with members of the news media about demand response’s
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
51
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 67 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
benefits, the need for it, and the ease of implementation for the customer, positive
news stories and editorials would help to shape public opinion in favor of demand
response. In addition, appearances by experts on talk shows would give more
customers a better understanding of demand response.
•
Advertising. If local resources allow, advertising or public service announcements
(PSAs) could be a key part of local communications efforts, with the national
communications program providing the template advertisements or PSAs that could
be tailored to reference local programs and information. Media buys for paid
advertising could be funded by states or localities, utilities, load-serving entities,
other demand response providers, or a combination of these groups. If paid
advertising funding is unavailable, the PSA version can be used to attain free
placements of the same messages. To reach the broadest range of customers in each
market, depending on which customer segments the foundational research indicates
offer the best opportunity, advertising might run on:
•
Television
•
Radio
•
Outdoor media, such as billboards and advertisements on buses
•
Direct mail
•
Internet
•
Emerging media technologies, such as cell phone text messaging
The Communications Umbrella would also develop attractive, customer-focused
educational support materials, which could be tailored with local information and
would be available digitally for stakeholders’ use (e.g., brochures, videos, PSAs, a
reference website).
•
Viral 59 and grassroots marketing. In addition to a local mass media program, a fully
integrated communications program could also include a grassroots approach that
leverages emerging social networks in the digital space. A viral and grassroots
marketing outreach might include:
•
59
52
The creation of groups within social media sites like Facebook and Twitter,
as well as new sites as they gain popularity.
“Viral marketing” refers to marketing intended to be “spread” by those to whom it is marketed,
instead of via traditional media channels like news and advertising. For example, a viral video is
produced with the intent that people within the target audience would view it and then share it with
their friends and associates, who would in turn share it with their own networks, and so on. This
spreading of content through social networks is called viral marketing because of its similarity in
structure to the public health model of a virus spreading from its original source.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 68 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
The engagement of third-party “demand response champions” who can blog
or tweet about it.
•
Development and posting of viral videos that demonstrate the potential
benefits of demand response or, alternatively, what the future might be like
without demand response.
This type of approach could potentially tie into a national communications program
over time, as the social network around the groups, champions, and videos grows
larger and more geographically diverse.
Example: Grassroots Marketing
In 2007, UNICEF created a grassroots
initiative called the Tap Project, which
raises money during World Water Week
with the goal of providing clean water to
children around the world. The Tap
Project began in 2007 as a demonstration
program in New York City and has now
expanded to all 50 states. The national
campaign develops the broad campaign
message platform, an annual theme, and
template materials, and then hands them
over to individual communications teams
in each of the targeted cities. Each city’s
team translates the messages and theme
into its own campaign and launches that
campaign through PSAs, news media
outreach, local events, and extensive
online viral and grassroots marketing.
The result is a series of localized
communications efforts with their own
unique characteristics.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
53
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 69 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Support for Other Demand Response Programs
Purpose
Provide tools adapted from the Communications Umbrella so regions, states,
and localities can employ the messages and tools most useful to them in
informing customers and stakeholders about demand response.
Expected
Outcome
A broad spectrum of toolkit materials that can supplement an entity’s existing
communications efforts, add an additional program layer, or serve as a new
program where previously there was none. Guidance on strategies for
effective customer outreach.
To support the efforts of utilities, load-serving entities, and other demand response providers
that do not directly participate as demonstration programs, the Coalition could oversee the
development of template toolkit materials, as mentioned earlier in this section, enabling those
entities to manage their own local demand response communications programs. The
materials in the toolkit would be customizable to account for a local program’s name, logo,
website URL, and needs. The toolkit materials would be designed to be “plug and play” so
that local entities would be able to use all available messages and materials or choose which
elements to use. Local stakeholders, states, or localities could fund local implementation of
toolkit-based communications efforts.
Toolkit materials could include:
•
•
Sample messages, which can be tailored with local program information and
segmented by audience type, seasonal peak load pattern, general demand response
program and pricing design, and other variables.
•
Template talking points for local utilities, load-serving entities, and other demand
response providers, segmented by the variables outlined above.
•
Template PSAs that can be run on local television without charge, as well as
guidance on how to get PSAs placed on local broadcast and cable networks.
•
Template press materials, including press releases introducing a new program or
announcing the introduction of new technology or pricing, frequently asked
questions for journalists about demand response, and how-to guides for media
outreach.
•
54
A foundational customer research primer covering customer behavior, responses to
various terms and messages around demand response, findings on how best to
position demand response as a part of smart energy use, and analysis of how best to
segment audiences to achieve maximum results.
Print-ready materials such as brochures and flyers, designed to be printed with local
logos, program names, and website URLs inserted.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 70 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
Advertising for TV, print, radio, outdoor, and online media, all of which can be
tagged with local program information.
•
A sample integrated communications program plan, outlining how best to maximize
the local program’s impact with a combination of various outreach methods, as well
as guidance on how to select media to reach the most receptive audience segments.
Example: Communications Toolkit
The Covering Kids & Families
campaign provided free toolkits and
message guides to anyone
interested in reaching out to families
about children’s health coverage.
The campaign developed tools such
as the comprehensive “Back-toSchool Campaign Action Kit,” which
provided templates and tools to do
everything from writing and sending
a press release to conducting a local
enrollment event and press
conference. Another toolkit provided
step-by-step instructions on
customizing and placing a PSA.
These toolkits even enabled
organizations that were not official
grantees or demonstration programs
to be a part of the larger campaign
and get the message out in the most
convenient way.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
55
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 71 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Direct Outreach to States, Policymakers, and Partners
Purpose
Provide a general framework of support for demand response implementation
programs taking place across the country.
Expected
Outcome
Broader education for policymakers and stakeholders necessary to the
successful implementation of demand response, and national and regional
partnerships supporting local efforts.
Although the bulk of the national communications program activities — particularly public
education — would take place at the regional and local levels, there is an important role for
certain national activities that would amplify the impact of local communications.
Communications Assistance to States and Policymakers
Support to states, localities, and regions would be another key part of the national
communications program. Communications programs or meetings would be provided,
possibly as part of regional workshops, to educate state and local governing officials on how
to communicate with customers about demand response. Such educational programs would
offer an opportunity to share findings from consumer research and demand response experts,
provide information on messages to engage various stakeholder and consumer audiences, and
provide tools to ensure state and local governing officials can begin reaching out to customers
with educational information about demand response programs, products, technologies, and
incentives. Because support from state and local governing officials is important for demand
response implementation, efforts to implement demand response programs and products
locally may benefit from the Coalition coordinating the provision of communications
assistance to state and local governing officials and stakeholders to allow them to properly
assess and understand demand response in an unbiased manner. Such communications
assistance might include: 1) communications education and message guides that outline the
need for demand response action, 2) national spokespeople to inform media and state and
local governing officials, and 3) assistance in building support for demand response among the
general public. This assistance would enable policymakers and others to inform customer
groups about demand response opportunities and capabilities they can incorporate into their
businesses, industries, and homes, ultimately boosting customer acceptance of demand
response.
Partnership Development
The national communications program would foster development of national and local
partnerships between the Coalition and 1) corporate partners whose customers are making
decisions about electricity usage; 2) organizations representing various customer classes, such
as commercial and industrial customers, certain subsets of residents, etc.; and 3) trade
associations or other groups that would benefit from partnerships, e.g., the pairing of variable
resource development with dispatchable demand response.
56
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 72 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Both manufacturers and retail sellers of large home appliances that could be demand
response– or smart grid–enabled would be ideal partners for the program. Because these
corporations regularly interact with the public (e.g., when customers consider purchasing
new appliances), achieving some program and message visibility at the point of purchase
would be extremely advantageous and would reach the audience when it is most receptive.
Similarly, partnerships among trade associations, such as those representing industrial
customers and those representing wind resources, might help states meet renewable portfolio
standards.
Partnerships between for-profit corporations and nonprofit cause-related programs are
common. Corporations are eager to participate in such partnerships if they believe their
participation could have positive business repercussions or improve their image through
association with a worthy cause. For example, a home improvement retailer chain may be
interested in partnering with the national demand response program to 1) associate the
company with an energy-saving initiative that shows its customers that it is forward-looking
and concerned with environmental health, and 2) increase sales of demand response– or
smart grid–enabled appliances. Partnering with such a company could make demand
response issues more visible to customers and create additional touchpoints between the
customer and the issue beyond traditional media outlets.
In terms of organizational partnerships, groups that represent businesses, industrial
customers, and subsets of the public at large would be excellent program partners, as they
provide access to millions of key business and household decision-makers through their
communications networks. Such groups include trade associations and consumer advocacy
organizations. These types of partnerships would allow the Communications Umbrella to
target the groups or geographic regions that can make the best use of demand response to
reliably and economically meet goals and objectives at the local, state, regional, national, or
individual levels. Coordination with key associations representing these customer segments
could increase the effectiveness of a communications strategy while reducing costs.
Corporate and organizational partners would be selected on the basis of their reach within
key audience segments, their relevance to advancing the issue, and their ability to commit
resources to support the effort. They also could support message outreach to groups that
might not otherwise learn about the benefits of demand response programs, or that might not
have the information necessary to improve their lives by participating in demand response
programs.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
57
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 73 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Example: National and Local Communications Partnership
The Covering Kids & Families campaign
sought to enroll eligible children and
families in public health insurance
programs. To get these children enrolled,
the campaign had to reach their parents.
Through the development of corporate
partnerships, the campaign gained
millions of dollars of in-kind placement in
retail environments where parents are
most likely to be thinking about their
children. In a partnership with Giant
Foods on the East Coast, the campaign
secured placement of an enrollment PSA
on the sides of milk cartons during the
back-to-school time period. In a
partnership with CVS/Pharmacy, the
campaign ran PSAs on the prescription
information forms for anyone under the
age of 18. These partnerships involved
no direct costs for the campaign but
provided enormous added visibility for its
messages.
2.3 Tools and Materials For Use by Customers, States,
and Demand Response Providers
Section 529 of EISA requires that the National Action Plan develop or identify analytical
tools, information, model regulatory provisions, model contracts, and other support materials
for use by customers, states, utilities, and demand response providers. Therefore, in this
section, the National Action Plan identifies tools and materials that can be used by customers,
states, and demand response providers. The Coalition or the federal agency would oversee
the development and management of these tools and materials. The level of effort put into
these tools and materials will depend on the funding and other resources available for
implementation. With limited resources, the elements proposed in this section would largely
be enhancements of existing tools and support of ongoing efforts. New and innovative tools
and materials would be developed if more resources can be applied.
The development and enhancement of tools and materials will serve several objectives. For
instance, states not currently engaged in demand response will have access to a
comprehensive source of information that could help them decide what types of demand
response programs are appropriate. States that are already engaged in demand response will
be able to share their experiences and gather more information about how to measure results
and improve their programs. Utilities will be able to examine other pilot program design and
58
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 74 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
results, while consumers will have tools to help them decide if they would benefit from
demand response programs. All of this information will help optimize program benefits.
Based on stakeholder input and further research, the National Action Plan contains two
general categories of action for the development of tools and materials:
1. Develop a Web-based clearinghouse of demand response materials.
2. Develop or enhance demand response estimation tools and methods.
Develop a Web-based Clearinghouse of Demand Response Materials
Purpose
Provide easily accessible, accurate information on demand response for
stakeholders.
Expected
Outcome
Increased awareness of existing demand response experiences and their
reported benefits and lessons learned, resulting in additional use of welldesigned demand response programs.
There is strong support for developing an easily accessible website database, or “Web-based
clearinghouse,” to serve as the centralized location for collecting all publicly available
information on demand response, including regulatory documents, program reports, general
demand response information, and communications material. The goal for the Web-based
clearinghouse will be to provide stakeholders and consumers with the most current
information and analyses on demand response.
The Web-based clearinghouse may be included as part of an existing federal agency
clearinghouse or may be privately funded and maintained by the Coalition. In either event,
the Web-based clearinghouse for demand response would include information that
stakeholders can use to make their own evaluations and judgments on the reports and
information that the Web-based clearinghouse contains. For example, in addition to posting
a report on a demand response pilot program, it would present guidelines, criteria, and
metrics that can be considered when evaluating pilots. Additionally, the clearinghouse would
be a useful tool for making technical papers (developed as a result of Coalition discussions)
available to states and others.
The Web-based clearinghouse should build on and collaborate with existing efforts to collect
data on demand response programs and reports. The most relevant ongoing effort in this area
is the new DOE-sponsored Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse. 60 The Web-based
clearinghouse for demand response could be coordinated with this effort, which was
launched with a $1.3 million budget (provided from the Recovery Act) in September 2009. 61
60
DOE, DOE Announces Funding Opportunity to Develop the Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse
(2009), available at http://www.oe.energy.gov/news_room_and_events/1223.htm.
61
Rich Sedano, Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse, Presentation to NARUC-FERC Smart Grid
Collaborative, available at http://www.narucmeetings.org/Presentations/FercSmartGrid_Sedano.pdf.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
59
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 75 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Based on preliminary information, the Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse may include a
significant amount of the demand response materials intended for the Web-based
clearinghouse in the National Action Plan. 62 The Smart Grid Information Clearinghouse is
expected to launch publicly in September 2010. 63
This Web-based clearinghouse can use other efforts as a model. One is DSIRE, the Database
of State Incentives for Renewable Energy — another DOE-funded project for collecting and
distributing information about renewable energy and energy efficiency efforts. The DSIRE
website provides users with visual tools for understanding the current status of funding,
standards, and state and federal incentives and mandates for renewables. It also contains
information about financial incentives and regulations regarding energy efficiency, along
with an extensive library of industry presentations and reports provided on a state-by-state
basis. This information allows for easy comparisons of programs and policies across states and
provides a simple means for understanding the “landscape” of energy efficiency and
renewable energy policy in the United States. Stakeholders have identified DSIRE as a useful
example of an online clearinghouse for information.
The California Measurement Advisory Council (CALMAC) maintains a website containing
information on demand-side programs in California. The purpose of the CALMAC website is
to provide “…a forum for the development, implementation, presentation, discussion, and
review of regional and statewide market assessment and evaluation studies for California
energy efficiency programs and demand response…” 64 The site’s searchable database is
helpful for finding relevant, up-to-date materials, particularly impact evaluations conducted
by utilities and independent consulting firms. This type of information could be included in
the Web-based clearinghouse.
The objectives of the Web-based clearinghouse would change over time. In the short term,
the effort would be focused more on assembling the results of pilots and studies on the
impacts and benefits of new dynamic pricing and smart grid-enabled programs. This
information would help to establish confidence in the ability of these new programs to
provide reliable benefits. In the long term, as programs become established through full-scale
implementation, the focus would shift to identifying model programs and policies, as well as
prioritizing findings from the research that has been conducted.
The following subsections describe the types of content that the Web-based clearinghouse
could include.
62
Id.
63
Id.
64
See California Measurement Advisory Council, http://www.calmac.org/ (last visited Jan. 21, 2010).
60
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 76 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Case Studies of State Laws, Regulations, and Tariffs
The Web-based clearinghouse would provide access to comprehensive case studies that
include specifics about demand response programs. For example, information regarding state
laws, regulations, tariffs, generation mix, forecasted load, technology employed,
communications strategy, and retail cost recovery would provide helpful contextual
information for understanding and comparing demand response programs. To the extent
possible, actual laws, regulations, and tariff language would be provided.
State laws, regulations, and tariff language included in the Web-based clearinghouse could be
used as a sample or template that stakeholders can adapt, based on their unique goals,
preferences, and needs, in developing their programs and policies. Furthermore, any
contextual information that is included would help stakeholders adapt the state laws,
regulations, and tariff language to their unique circumstances.
For example, California’s Energy Action Plan includes a model regulation for preferred
loading order of resources: energy efficiency; demand response; renewable energy sources;
and conventional generation options that could be included in the Web-based clearinghouse
for other states to use as a model for similar legislation. 65 Also, California’s Energy Action
Plan set a target reduction in peak demand of 5 percent for 2007. 66 When the three investorowned electric utilities only achieved 40 percent of that target in 2007, the utilities were
asked to revamp their efforts. Simultaneously, CPUC approved business cases for the
deployment of AMI by all three utilities 67 and then issued a landmark ruling making dynamic
pricing the default tariff for all nonresidential customers who were part of AMI. Information
about California’s Energy Action Plan, coupled with updates about how it is being carried
out, would help other states if they undertake similar efforts.
Connecticut provides another example of a regulation-related case study. The Connecticut
state legislature passed legislation that required electric distribution companies to conduct
integrated resource planning beginning on January 1, 2008. 68 The identified resource needs
must first be met through all available energy efficiency and demand reduction resources that
are cost-effective, reliable, and feasible. 69 Among other things, the electric distribution
companies’ procurement plans must specify the amount of demand-side measures, such as
demand response, that can meet the capacity planning needs. 70
65
Id.
66
Id.
67
See, e.g., California Public Utilities Commission, Decision Adopting Dynamic Pricing Timetable and
Rate Design Guidance for Pacific Gas & Electric Company, D. 08-07-045 (2008).
68
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16a-3a (2008).
69
Id., § 16a-3a(c).
70
Id.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
61
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 77 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Database of Pilots, Programs, and Markets
There are different types of demand response programs across the country. The Web-based
clearinghouse should include a database of both pilot and fully implemented demand
response programs. The database should include general descriptions of each of these
programs and, to the extent possible, reports that summarize each program’s results, lessons
learned, and benefits and drawbacks.
Information on the programs should be supplemented with marketing materials, surveys of
customer satisfaction, and the names of contractors or vendors that provided enabling
technology and devices that supported demand response. These materials would provide
useful qualitative information that stakeholders could use to enhance their own programs.
Furthermore, the lessons learned from this information could supplement the
communications materials that are developed as part of the communications program (see
Section 2.2). 71
The existence of a central collection of reported impacts from existing demand response
programs and products would help shed light on the ability of demand response to provide
consistent, measurable impacts and would also serve as a resource for benchmarking newly
reported impacts from demand response program offerings.
The Web-based clearinghouse should include a broad mix of programs to serve as case studies
in program design, implementation, and evaluation. Examples include new pilot programs
run by utilities such as Consumers Energy in Michigan, Commonwealth Edison in Illinois,
Baltimore Gas & Electric in Maryland, and Northeast Utilities in Connecticut, as well as
mature programs such as Detroit Edison’s Direct Load Control Interruptible Air
Conditioning 72 program and California’s “Flex Your Power” campaign to promote customer
awareness of pending energy shortages and encourage reduced energy use. 73 Users of the
Web-based clearinghouse would be able to find information on each of these programs and, if
they exist, reports evaluating the impacts of each program. With this information, users
would be able to compare and contrast the value of each program, which would help to
inform their decisions on how to implement their own programs.
Quantitative and Qualitative Summaries
Detailed supply-side information is contained on the U.S. Energy Information
Administration’s website. The Web-based clearinghouse will aspire to provide a similar level
of granularity in demand-side information. Examples of data that could be collected include a
71
The Web-based clearinghouse should serve as a central location for communications materials as well.
For information on these materials, see Section 2.2.
72
DTE Energy, Interruptible Air Conditioning Rate (2009),
http://www.dteenergy.com/residentialCustomers/billingPayment/rates/electric/interruptibleRates.html.
73
For more information about the Flex Your Power campaign, visit http://www.fypower.org/.
62
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 78 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
listing of each demand response program and product being offered, peak demand impacts
from demand response, costs of the programs, and participation rates. One useful way to
organize these data would be by utility, load-serving entity, state, and RTO/ISO.
Recently, FERC has been collecting some of this information through its survey of demand
response programs. The results of this publicly available survey provide the basis of FERC’s
Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering reports. 74 Additionally, the North
American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) collects related data at the wholesale level
and recently initiated an effort to improve its demand response data collection
methodology. 75 The results of these efforts would be included as part of the Web-based
clearinghouse.
In addition to quantitative data, the clearinghouse could also collect detailed qualitative
information. For example, the clearinghouse could provide a profile of the regulatory
environment in which the programs are being offered, showing whether the demand
response program is implemented in a state that has rate decoupling and whether the demand
response program is being driven by the utility, regulatory commission, RTO/ISO, other
demand response provider, or other party. Another example is information on the variations
in RTO and ISO demand response, such as what requirements the provider must meet in
order to bid and the incentives to participate. Other helpful qualitative information could
include the amounts and types of demand response being incorporated into transmission
planning and resource planning, a summary of marketing and customer recruitment efforts,
and key lessons learned.
The clearinghouse could also include or provide linkages to quantitative and qualitative
information on demand response developed by other entities. For example, EPA could share
information to help states and other stakeholders understand the potential effects demand
response may have on emissions.
Measuring Program Results with Criteria and Metrics
The wide variety of demand response programs across the country leads to wide variation in
the reports on the results and lessons learned. The Web-based clearinghouse should include
criteria and metrics that help stakeholders understand and evaluate these reports, make
informed judgments about the results the reports present, and make meaningful comparisons
across the reports. For example, principles of pilot program design — internal and external
validity, control and treatment groups, selection of participants, measurement of load and
other data, and payment or other incentives—would be valuable to clearinghouse users.
74
Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering, supra note 18.
75
NERC, Data Collection for Demand-Side Management for Quantifying Its Influence on Reliability:
Results and Recommendations (2007).
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
63
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 79 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Information for Program Implementation
The Web-based clearinghouse should provide information for stakeholders interested in
implementing their own demand response programs. Unlike case studies and pilot results,
which consider historical events and remain static, the information for program
implementation could be updated with the results of case studies, pilot results, and utility
smart grid and demand response business cases to highlight current and future issues in
program design and implementation. Information would be provided on how to implement
both dynamic rate design and non-rate-based demand response programs. The clearinghouse
also should include information on available smart grid technologies, which will play a
crucial role in demand response implementation.
A stakeholder must consider many options if planning to implement demand response using a
dynamic rate. 76 The Web-based clearinghouse would provide information on options for
both the dynamic rate selection and its specific design. For example, the strength of the price
signal to customers (i.e., the differential between the peak and off-peak prices) indicates to
the customer the magnitude of the incentive to reduce consumption when the price is high
and relates to the customer’s opportunity for significant bill savings. Program enrollment and
peak reductions likely are dependent on the opportunity for bill savings. Finally, the
complexity of the rate design will play an important role in a customer’s ability and
willingness to respond to a dynamic rate.
The clearinghouse would provide non-rate-based demand response information as well. For
example, when designing direct load control programs, it is important to consider how signals
will be sent to the load control devices. Furthermore, the devices can be both one-way (i.e.,
only receiving the signal to be controlled) or two-way (i.e., the device receives the signal to
be controlled and sends a signal back to the dispatcher confirming receipt). The duration and
frequency with which the controlled devices cease to operate are another example of useful
information in this context.
The foundation of much of this type of information is publicly available through filings with
state commissions. However, there is no central location for easily locating the most up-todate materials on demand response program implementation and design stemming from prior
efforts. Therefore, a coordinated effort to collect and organize these data, beginning with a
comprehensive assessment of the data that are already available, would facilitate discussion of
the issues facing stakeholders who are currently designing and implementing their own
demand response programs.
76
64
For more detailed information on dynamic rate design see, for example, Faruqui A, Hledik R,
“Transition to Dynamic Pricing,” Public Utilities Fortnightly (March 2009), and Faruqui A et al.,
Rethinking Rate Design Demand Response (2007) (issue paper prepared for the Demand Response
Research Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory).
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 80 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Online Message Board Capability
In addition to serving as a central location for demand response reports and resources, the
Web-based clearinghouse also should serve as an online message board where qualifying state
agencies (e.g., state regulatory commissions, state energy offices), consumer advocacy groups,
and utilities may ask for specific virtual or onsite demand response assistance with regard to
program design, implementation, and/or evaluation. In conjunction with the demand
response assistance program discussed in Section 2.1, experts could review the message board
posts and offer assistance. The nature of this assistance might involve referring a caller to a
website, providing applicable reference materials, or perhaps providing onsite technical help
(for a day, a week, or longer).
Information About the Development of Standards and Protocols
The development of standards and protocols is important for creating an interoperable
electric grid. However, because other organizations have already taken the lead in
developing standards and protocols, the Coalition could oversee the tracking of the standards
development process. Up-to-date information on progress in the standards development
process would be made available through the Web-based clearinghouse.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has established a process and plan
that are designed to establish smart grid interoperability standards per its mandate from
EISA. 77 NIST has allocated $5 million of its Recovery Act funding for this purpose. 78 Over
the past year, NIST launched the initial stages of its broad effort, including creating Domain
Expert Working Groups (in conjunction with DOE) to concentrate on focus areas and
developing an Interoperability Knowledge Base to promote shared understanding and
terminology. 79 In addition, the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) and NERC
have already undertaken standard and protocol efforts for the smart grid. The Coalition
should design the Web-based clearinghouse to allow interested persons to track these efforts
to develop standards and protocols, perhaps through coordination with the NIST Smart Grid
Interoperability Panel.
There are many examples of standards and protocols that could be developed to support
demand response.
These include communication protocols for consumer demand
information, data privacy and cyber-security standards, standards for plug-in hybrid electric
vehicles and fully electric vehicles, and measurement and verification standards.
Standard communication protocols would allow information on electricity demand and prices
to flow unimpeded from consumers to a utility, demand response provider, or wholesale
market operator. All transmitted information also should be readily available to consumers,
77
More information and a summary of recent activity can be found at http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/.
78
See id.
79
See id.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
65
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 81 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
because these signals (which traditionally came in the form of calling or paging facility
managers) instruct customers to reduce their load in response to market prices or grid
reliability concerns. Current technology, such as the automated demand response program,
allows system operators and utilities to interact directly with commercial and industrial
facility control systems that are pre-programmed to take action based on a demand response
signal, without manual intervention. 80 Standardizing demand response signaling could make
it easier for facilities to respond to calls for load reductions and management, and thus
potentially increase the amount of customer participation in demand response programs and
products. An example of such a standard could be the Open Automated Demand Response
(OpenADR) specification, developed by the Demand Response Research Center. OpenADR
provides a standardized demand response communications and signaling infrastructure using
open, industry-approved data models.
Demand response activities will generate a significant amount of new data about consumers’
actions and energy usage. Protocols would be developed for the appropriate protection of this
information, including standards for the entities that should, or may, have access to this
information and specific conditions for accessing this information. Furthermore, it will be
crucial for all newly generated data to be transmitted over secure lines of communication
between system operators and demand response providers. Establishing a secure and open
standard for the transmittal of private consumer data in addition to sensitive information
relating to the overall electrical grid would be a significant step forward for states, utilities,
other load-serving entities, and customers looking to invest in demand response products or
other enabling technologies.
Nationwide standards for charging stations for PHEVs and electric vehicles also should be
adopted. 81 These charging stations should have appropriate communications, metering and
electric flow control, and standardized plug interface. These actions would facilitate the use
of PHEV and electric vehicles for their variable storage potential to provide ancillary services
to the electric grid. Nationwide standards would also reduce barriers to interoperability, such
as the need to develop PHEVs and electric vehicles that meet standards that vary state by
state.
Finally, development of measurement and verification standards is critically needed at both
the wholesale and retail levels. Methods for measuring and verifying demand response
reductions currently vary significantly across the country, and measurement and verification
80
See Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Open Automated Demand Response Communication
Specification (Version 1.0), (2009), available at http://drrc.lbl.gov/openadr/pdf/cec-500-2009063.pdf (prepared for the California Energy Commission, Public Energy Research Program). This
report “outlines a communications exchange signals specification to enable demand response in enduse participant or customer systems.”
81
For instance, SAE International has released a standard that provides a standard interface between
plug-in hybrid and battery-electric vehicles and electrical charging systems. See SAE International,
New SAE International Standard Defines Electric-Vehicle Charging Coupler (2010), available at
http://www.sae.org/servlets/pressRoom?OBJECT_TYPE=PressReleases&PAGE=showRelease&RELEASE
_ID=1141.
66
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 82 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
standards will increase confidence in markets. Efforts to standardize measurement and
verification are already underway. NAESB is currently leading an effort that has produced a
document describing model business practices for the measurement and verification of
demand response. 82 NAESB is also working with NERC to ensure that NERC’s demand
response data collection effort conforms to a consistent measurement and verification
standard. NERC’s Demand Response Data Task Force is charged with developing a systematic
approach for collecting and disseminating data on demand response programs, products, and
services administered by retail and wholesale entities throughout North America. The efforts
of NAESB and NERC should provide valuable tools and standardization to ensure that
demand response is accurately measured and verified.
Develop or Enhance Demand Response Estimation Tools and Methods
Purpose
Determine the potential value and benefits of demand response solutions.
Assess whether demand response solutions deliver value and benefits once
deployed.
Expected
Outcome
A set of tools and methods provided to regulators, operators, utilities, loadserving entities, other demand response providers, and consumers for
conducting simulations, analyses, and evaluations of demand response
programs that will lead to more cost-effective programs and optimal
participation by consumers.
Analytical tools and methods would be developed or enhanced to: 1) help in the expansion of
existing demand response programs and creation of new programs by valuating each
program’s benefits and costs; 2) advance the use of demand response to support reliable and
efficient operations of wholesale transmission, energy, capacity, and ancillary services
markets; and 3) better enable end-use consumers to optimize savings, possibly through
automation, while enrolled in a demand response program.
The Coalition or the federal agency could oversee assistance to organizations that are
developing or enhancing tools and methods. These organizations would begin by identifying
well-established tools and methods already being used to evaluate program impacts and costeffectiveness. Next, organizations would consider how these tools could be enhanced or
consider areas where the development of additional tools would be beneficial. To do this,
organizations should engage in new research identifying beneficial characteristics of existing
tools or meet through conference venues to foster information-sharing on current successful
examples. Based on the outcomes of either of these options, projects to modify existing tools
and methods or develop new ones would be identified. The Coalition could help identify
options such as the degree of customization. For instance, it might be better that some tools
be developed at a generic level and then customized at user expense, while other tools include
pre-developed options that allow users to customize them without additional expense.
82
NAESB, M&V for Demand Response Programs (2009), available at
http://naesb.org/pdf4/dsmee_group2_070709reqcom_attach.doc.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
67
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 83 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
These tools and materials would be tailored to circumstances in wholesale and retail markets,
as well as restructured and nonrestructured markets with vertically integrated utilities, so as
to capture the differing sets of incentives and rules for pursuing demand response. For
instance, tools for analyzing retail demand response programs must reflect that these
programs are run through load-serving entities or other demand response providers, and that
consumers are usually faced with a tariff or contractual obligation for participation in demand
response programs. Conversely, tools for analyzing wholesale demand response programs
must be built to reflect that participants are bidding resources into a market, possibly setting
the RTO’s locational price.
In addition to helping support full utilization of demand response resources in deployment,
these tools and methods also could be structured to support energy efficiency programs. This
could be achieved by making the tools and methods more flexible and not focused solely on
demand response. In particular, the tools and methods could include the option to calculate
the impacts, benefits, costs, etc., of utilizing more energy-efficient equipment. The
integration of energy efficiency with demand response in the creation of tools and methods
will advance the objectives of both types of demand side resources.
The following subsections suggest the types of tools and methods that could be developed to
support demand response.
System Impact Estimation and Prediction Tools
System impact estimation and prediction tools are important because they allow stakeholders
and policymakers to estimate the effects of demand response programs, products,
technologies, and incentives on system resource requirements, wholesale prices, and
emissions of carbon dioxide and other air pollutants before spending money on pilots and/or
full implementation. For some types of demand response programs, baseline predictions on
consumer demand would need to be calculated. Tools and methods for conducting these
calculations should be developed.
Tools that can analyze some aspects of potential demand response impacts already exist. As
part of the resource planning process, most utilities and ISOs/RTOs operate capacity
expansion models through which demand response and energy efficiency measures can
“compete” with supply-side resources to determine the optimal mix of resources for the
system. In this case, the federal agency or the Coalition should facilitate a deeper
understanding of how demand-side programs can be accurately integrated into what
traditionally have been more supply-side-centric modeling frameworks.
Additionally, through the National Assessment, FERC staff developed a tool for estimating
the state-level potential for demand response under a variety of scenarios. 83 This tool was the
83
68
The model is available at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/drpotential.asp.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 84 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
basis for the estimates of demand response potential provided in the National Assessment and
has served as a valuable starting point for individual states and other entities to conduct more
detailed and tailored assessments of their own.
To support the National Action Plan and bridge the gap between estimates of demand
response potential and existing capacity expansion plans, FERC staff is in the process of
developing a quantitative estimation tool that, given a capacity expansion plan, will yield
information on plant dispatch and energy margins, reserve margins, and unused supply. For a
brief description of the tool under development, see Sidebar 3 at the end of this section.
The InterAct tool, developed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company, is an example of an existing
demand response tool that has been developed for customers. This free online tool is
available to any large customer (200 kilowatts [kW] or greater) with 15-minute-interval load
shape data and temperature readings to guide decisions related to demand response.
InterAct’s Energy and Cost Analysis module provides customers with tools to create graphs
and charts, conduct statistical analyses, and export data. These options allow the consumer to
closely track and understand their electric demand and usage. This tool helps consumers
optimize their participation in demand response programs by notifying them of events via
multiple media, allows consumers to easily accept or decline a curtailment notice, and gives
consumers actual demand reductions and incentive payments after the event day. 84
Another example comes from the Building Energy Software Tools Directory. 85 The Demand
Response Quick Assessment Tool, developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
helps commercial customers predict energy and demand savings for various demand response
strategies. It allows users to run simulations based on a set of assumptions and variables. 86
A final example of an analysis tool comes from the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). RMI
developed a dispatch model of what it calls the Next Generation Utility. 87 The model is
designed to provide insight on the potential of specific dispatchable demand response
resources and technologies (e.g., for air conditioning, lighting, and plug loads) to reshape the
load profile to better match renewable output. RMI’s modeling focus has been on analyzing
the combined effects of these resources in an electric system with high penetrations of wind
and solar energy. The capabilities of the dispatch model with respect to demand response are:
modeling traditional load-curtailment demand response; modeling thermal storage strategies
84
For more information about the InterAct tool, visit
http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/energysavingsrebates/demandresponse/tools/.
85
DOE developed this directory because its Office of Building Technology, State and Community
Program develops software tools to help researchers, designers, architects, engineers, builders, code
officials, and others involved in the building life cycle to evaluate and rank potential energy efficiency
technologies and renewable energy strategies in new or existing buildings. To learn more about the
directory and tools, visit http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/.
86
To learn more about the Demand Response Quick Assessment Tool, visit
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/software.cfm/ID=522/pagename=alpha_list.
87
For more information about RMI’s dispatch model, visit http://ert.rmi.org/research/next-generationutility.html.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
69
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 85 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
such as ice storage and pre-cooling buildings to analyze consumer savings and electric system
impacts; and analyzing driving and charging patterns for fleets of plug-in vehicles. RMI is
also incorporating the hourly dispatch methodology into an integrated system planning tool
for utilities and regulators to use for modeling the financial and operational characteristics of
future scenarios. This expanded functionality will include modeling the impacts of investing
in demand response along with renewables to minimize reliability concerns.
70
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 86 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Example: InterAct Tool
The InterAct tool provides summary statistics regarding usage and load.
The InterAct tool summarizes usage and demand data in graphical form with temperatures
overlaid.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
71
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 87 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Example: Demand Response Quick Assessment Tool
The Demand Response Quick Assessment Tool has an interface that allows users to set
the assumptions and variables associated with a building.
Results of the Demand Response Quick Assessment Tool simulation are presented
graphically and textually for analysis.
72
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 88 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Example: RMI Dispatch Model
The RMI dispatch model illustrates how demand response can
shift demand to times when renewable generators are
producing power rather than dispatching expensive and
inefficient quick-ramping generators.
The RMI dispatch model can simulate the capacity mix for
alternative scenarios and resources.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
73
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 89 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Cost-Effectiveness Tools
Determining the cost-effective mix of demand response programs is a central challenge to any
demand response provider, regulator, or policymaker. Projections of long-term benefit
streams (such as avoided resource costs), identification of relevant costs, and the accurate
characterization of these costs are examples of the types of calculations that must be made in
assessing a program’s cost-effectiveness. The creation of cost-effectiveness tools is essential to
determining the most efficient mix of demand response programs for a given service territory
or region.
Methods for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of demand-side management programs have
been in use for many years. For example, the California Standard Practice Manual provides
detailed guidelines for assessing the cost-effectiveness of demand side programs from several
different perspectives. 88 The cost-effectiveness tests defined in the report are used by utilities
and regulators across the United States and abroad. The federal agency or the Coalition could
oversee and support efforts, such as national workshops or further research, to develop new
methods or tailor existing methods for analyzing demand response.
A tool to help retail electricity consumers assess the net financial benefits of participating in
demand response programs would be valuable, particularly for commercial and industrial
consumers. The Demand Response Quick Assessment Tool discussed earlier in this section is
a step in this direction. Ideally, such a tool would use the best available information to show
customers how their electricity bill would change if they were to participate in a given
demand response program.
A final example is a tool that aids load-serving entities, developers of variable resources, and
transmission developers in assessing the value and cost-effectiveness of demand response as a
resource. This may become especially important in carbon-constrained environments. Case
studies of AMI business case filings should be placed in the previously discussed Web-based
clearinghouse. Such filings exist for any utility that has sought regulatory approval for an
investment in smart meters, and could guide cost-effectiveness analysis in a different region.
Beyond case studies, a more detailed tool that would allow the user to customize analysis for a
given set of system conditions and cost assumptions would further improve understanding of
a given program’s potential cost-effectiveness.
Decision Tools for End-Use Consumers
Decision tools are crucial to help end-use customers understand how to change their
consumption patterns to achieve bill savings and provide system benefits while enrolled in a
demand response program. The federal agency or the Coalition would oversee the
identification of new tools that each customer class needs, as well as support the development
of selected tools. These tools should draw on past experience and case studies to help
88
74
CPUC, California Standard Practice Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Programs and Projects
(2002), available at http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/CA-SPManual-7-02.pdf.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 90 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
customers in specific industries or with specific types of facilities (e.g., warehousing, health
care, or retailing) select appropriate demand response providers, programs, and technologies.
Some customers manage multiple facilities, each varying in size and relative location.
Examples of such consumers include university campuses, national retailers, and federal or
military sites. The development of demand response-related tools and plans to engage these
existing customers with special circumstances may help achieve the maximum amount of
demand response that can be developed and deployed.
Information in these tools would be updated as market, economic, and regulatory factors
change.
Cost Recovery Tools and Methods for Enabling Technology
Tools and methods need to be provided to develop the business case and examine options for
recovering costs of installing approved, cost-effective new technologies that enable demand
response. Each cost recovery option should include an assessment of the impact on customer
rates. Such tools could assist utilities and state and local governing officials that are
considering demand response programs by providing important information on the financial
impacts of each demand response investment. The federal agency or the Coalition could
facilitate discussions between utilities and state and local governing officials so that they can
learn best practices from each other with regard to cost recovery.
For example, devices such as advanced meters and smart thermostats are essential for some
demand response initiatives and can greatly increase the effectiveness of others. The
installation of these devices requires investment from load-serving entities and/or customers.
An appropriate method may be needed for utilities or load-serving entities to recover the
costs they incur.
Tools and Methods for Incorporating Demand Response in
Dispatch, Ancillary Services, Transmission, and Resource
Planning
New tools and methods should be developed to directly incorporate demand response into
dispatch algorithms and resource planning models. These tools and methods are important to
better capture the capability of demand response to serve as an alternative to building new
generation and transmission and to act as a resource to alleviate transmission congestion.
FERC's Order No. 890 could be instructive in the development of these tools and methods. In
Order No. 890, FERC stated that “where demand resources are capable of providing the
functions assessed in a transmission planning process, and can be relied upon on a long-term
basis, they should be permitted to participate in that process on a comparable basis.” 89 The
89
Preventing Undue Discrimination and Preference in Transmission Service, Order No. 890, FERC Stats.
& Regs. ¶ 31,241, at P 479, order on reh’g, Order No. 890-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,261 (2007),
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
75
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 91 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Coalition or federal agency could oversee the development of research and tools examining
ways to incorporate demand resources in these processes.
Also needed are better methods to forecast and model the capability of demand resources to
adjust consumption in near real-time. Finally, hardware and software tools that allow
customer appliances or vehicles to autonomously provide reliability services, such as
frequency response service, should be developed.
Transparency of Price Information
For large customers and policymakers to make decisions about the types of economic and
business opportunities available in demand response programs, they need access to real-time
or near-real-time energy prices. Therefore, there is value in developing tools that provide
access to real-time or near-real-time energy prices, ancillary service prices, capacity
payments, and congestion costs. Access to transparent price information should also be
provided to residential customers when feasible and cost-effective.
To a certain extent, real-time pricing (RTP) programs already provide information to
participants about the price of energy. Many utilities have websites that provide information
about the next day’s hourly prices. However, additional means are often taken to alert
customers about unusually high prices. In Commonwealth Edison’s residential RTP program,
customers are alerted via e-mail or text message if hourly energy prices are about to exceed a
pre-specified threshold. Other dynamic pricing programs will use similar means to convey
information to customers about upcoming event days. However, customers do not always use
these tools, and some are not aware that they even exist. The federal agency or the Coalition
would oversee and support efforts to improve the effectiveness of tool design.
A different example of a tool for providing price information in an innovative way is the
Energy Orb. The Energy Orb is a spherical glass lamp that emits different colors to signal offpeak, peak, and critical peak hours of the day. This is a visual aid that enhances a customer’s
ability to respond to price signals. Several recent dynamic pricing experiments have used the
Energy Orb in conjunction with dynamic rates to assess its impacts. The results have been
somewhat mixed. In the California Statewide Pricing Pilot, the Energy Orb led to greater
conservation and demand response impacts among residential customers. 90 At Baltimore Gas
& Electric Company, peak demand reductions increased from 18 to 21 percent without the
Energy Orb to 23 to 27 percent when it was provided. 91 However, Connecticut Light &
Power’s recent pilot had different results: the Energy Orb did not provide any incremental
order on reh’g, Order No. 890-B, 123 FERC ¶ 61,299 (2008), order on reh’g, Order No. 890-C, 126
FERC ¶ 61,228 (2009), Order No. 890-D, 129 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2009).
90
Nexus Energy Software et al., Information Display Pilot (2005).
91
The Brattle Group, BGE’s Smart Energy Pricing Pilot: Summer 2008 Impact Evaluation, (2009)
(prepared for Baltimore Gas & Electric Company).
76
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 92 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
demand response benefits. 92 Regardless, the device serves as an example of a tool that could
be used to provide information about price signals to customers.
Table 2 provides a list of the strategies and activities described in the Draft National Action
Plan.
Table 2: Strategies and Activities
Requirements for Technical Assistance
•
Establish a National Forum
•
Conduct Informational and Educational Sessions for Policymakers and Regulators
•
Build a Panel of Demand Response Experts
•
Sponsor Technical Papers
•
Establish a Program for Technical Assistance for Demand Response
•
Provide Demand Response Grants
Requirements for National Communications Program
•
Develop a Communications Umbrella
o
Program Development
Identify Demonstration Program Sites
o
Compile Case Studies
Conduct Program Evaluation
Message Framework Development
Conduct Foundational Market Research
Position Demand Response as Part of Overall Smart Energy Use
Develop Communications Materials, Tactics, and Toolkits
•
Develop Adaptable, Consumer-Friendly Messages
Develop Support Materials Tailored to Large Commercial and
Industrial Customers
Local Implementation
o
•
Support for Demonstration Programs
o
Support for Other Demand Response Programs
Direct Outreach to States, Policymakers, and Partners
o
Communications Assistance to States and Policymakers
o
Partnership Development
(Continued)
92
Connecticut Light and Power, Results of CL&P Plan-it Wise Energy Pilot, Docket No. 05-10-03RE01,
Compliance Order No. 4 (2009).
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
77
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 93 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Table 2: Strategies and Activities (continued)
Requirements for Tools and Materials For Use by Customers, States, and Demand
Response Providers
•
Develop a Web-Based Clearinghouse of Demand Response Materials
o
Database of Pilots, Programs, and Markets
o
Quantitative and Qualitative Summaries
o
Measuring Program Results with Criteria and Metrics
o
Information for Program Implementation
o
Online Message Board Capability
o
•
Case Studies of State Laws, Regulations, and Tariffs
o
Information About the Development of Standards and Protocols
Develop or Enhance Demand Response Estimation Tools and Methods
o
System Impact Estimation and Prediction Tools
o
Cost-Effectiveness Tools
o
Cost Recovery Tools and Methods for Enabling Technology
o
Tools and Methods for Incorporating Demand Response in Dispatch,
Ancillary Services Transmission, and Resource Planning
o
78
Decision Tools for End-Use Customers
o
Transparency of Price Information
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 94 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Sidebar 3: The DRIVE Model
The National Assessment answered an important question about the level of demand
response that could be achieved in the United States. It also raised new questions about
the implications of achieving this potential. For example:
•
How would demand response programs affect load during non-event hours?
•
What changes in system operations might demand response require?
•
How does demand response affect the need for new capacity?
•
How would carbon dioxide emissions change with demand response?
•
Would these effects change with the introduction of additional smart grid programs?
•
Ultimately, what is the dollar value (benefit) of these impacts?
To help answer such questions, FERC staff and The Brattle Group are currently developing
the Demand Response Impact and Value Estimation (DRIVE) model. The DRIVE model
estimates the impact of a portfolio of demand response and smart grid programs on
system operations, using specific characteristics of a power system as inputs.
The DRIVE model is an example of one type of tool that could be created through the
efforts of the National Action Plan. A simple user interface makes the model accessible to a
broad audience, supporting the educational objectives of the National Action Plan. Its
specific focus on demand response and smart grid programs makes it a useful complement
to other tools that are available for assessing the system impacts of energy resources.
Preliminary work with the DRIVE model suggests that:
•
Modest amounts of demand response can lead to large benefits.
•
Avoided capacity cost is a significant benefit.
•
Very large reductions in peak demand can lead to the creation of a new peak, which
can reduce potential benefits.
•
The value of large peak reductions may be enhanced by a broader range of
technologies and program offerings, the benefits of which may extend beyond
avoided capacity and into other areas like avoided energy costs and reduced carbon
dioxide emissions.
Part 2: Strategies and Activities
79
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 95 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 96 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
APPENDIX A:
Research Gaps
I
n developing a list of possible areas for further research, some potential resource and
research gaps have been identified. Research topics to fill these gaps are listed below,
organized by whether each topic relates more to social science 93 research or technical issues.
It will be the role of the federal agency and the Coalition, working with its members, to
prioritize the topics, identify additional topics, and select a subset as candidates for further
research.
Social Science Research Issues
•
•
How the participation rate and demand impacts vary depending on whether the
demand response rate design is required by law or regulation (e.g., as the default
rate) or if customers voluntarily sign up for it.
•
Estimates of customer price sensitivity by type and class of customer.
•
The short run price elasticities from pilot demand response programs are results that
originate in a few states (and Canadian provinces); investigate whether these results
are applicable to other areas, and also investigate how results would change over the
long run (i.e., whether they would be higher because of equipment purchase
decisions favoring storage and battery technologies or lower because of lack of
persistence).
•
Investigation of typical demand response participation rates and how these rates
vary based on program design parameters, marketing strategy, customer type
(residential, commercial, and industrial; gender and income level), and customer
profile (e.g., age, geographic location). Also, investigation into the non-price
response incentives that motivate customers to participate in demand response
programs and products.
•
93
Exploration of issues related to rate design, metering costs, and an analysis of
customer response to time-varying prices in successful programs.
Exploration of the effectiveness of demand response when critical days are sustained
for multiple days in a row and the persistence of demand response behavior when
programs and products are implemented over a long-term time horizon.
Social science research focuses on customer interest in demand response and how customers change
their consumption or behavior in response to demand response programs or dynamic pricing.
Appendix A: Research Gaps
A-1
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 97 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
Understanding how consumers shift demand to off-peak hours of the day and if
consumers take conservation measures to lower peak demand over all hours of the
day, not just during peak hours.
•
How demand response programs compare with energy efficiency programs in terms
of cost-effectiveness and demand reduction efficacy.
•
Identification of the most cost-effective demand response programs for customers
who do not have advanced metering infrastructure.
•
Impacts of customers participating in multiple demand response programs.
•
Research on electricity use by home office workers.
•
Research on effective gender-based, age-based, and race/ethnicity-based messages.
•
Research to identify “discretionary use” appliances — i.e., appliances whose
operations can easily be scheduled for off-peak times.
•
Usage of environmentally oriented feedback information, such as carbon content, to
motivate behavior change.
•
Impacts and benefits to low-income consumers.
Technical Research Issues
•
•
Better understanding of the optimal amount of consumer versus demand response
provider control of appliances.
•
An analysis of the environmental effects of demand response, such as: an estimate of
emissions mitigation when considering load reduction versus load shifting; an
assessment of the potential for demand response to assist in the integration of
variable resources such as renewable energy; and a calculation of environmental
benefits stemming from the reduced need to build new generation capacity and
transmission systems.
•
A study of how long demand response resources can be expected to provide resource
adequacy and reliability benefits compared with other resources, such as generation,
transmission, and storage.
•
A-2
Relative benefits and costs of various types of demand response programs, products,
technologies, and incentives, covering such topics as the various types of benefits,
potential costs, and payback horizons associated with each.
A study of how demand response resources can be dispatched to support and balance
variable generation from renewable energy.
Appendix A: Research Gaps
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 98 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
A study of how plug-in hybrid electric vehicles interact with demand response
programs, examining whether demand response rate design provides a price signal
that encourages PHEVs to charge during off-peak hours, as well as how different
demand response pricing mechanisms interact with PHEVs and their net impacts on
how demand for electricity might change.
•
Research into the appropriate codes and standards (e.g., building codes, consistent
definitions, performance standards) for demand response, considering whether they
will be mandated at the federal or state level; whether they are mandatory or
voluntary requirements; how they will be complied with and enforced; and how the
costs involved in their development, compliance, and enforcement will be paid for.
Integration of the many utility and third-party programs, devices, and software
applications needs to be taken into consideration.
•
Advanced metering topics such as estimating initial costs, methods used to recover
costs, calculating time to payback, the functionality of the devices, and dealing with
swift technology advancement.
•
Smart metering for residential customers, covering topics such as categories and
characteristics of various smart metering systems, cost-effectiveness, setting up the
communications and database, customer awareness, access to data, retrofitting
existing meter connections with smart technology, and consumer protections.
•
Implementation of demand response programs and products at government-owned
campuses, covering topics such as the types of demand response suitable for
government customer applications, barriers and lessons learned from existing
programs, percentages of the state electricity portfolio under municipal, county,
state, and federal control, and the potential impact of incorporating government
loads into demand response programs and products.
•
Ensuring smart grid cybersecurity, system reliability, and systems interoperability,
especially considering the massive amounts of data that could be transferred
between customers and utilities and other demand response providers.
•
An assessment of the job skills and training needed to successfully deploy demand
response programs, products, technologies, and incentives.
•
Best strategies to coordinate retail demand response programs with RTO/ISO
demand response programs for organized power markets.
•
A study of the benefits of a national demand response policy, including reliability,
efficiency, economic and environmental benefits, and benefits related to consumer
savings; the increased ability to integrate variable generation; and the increase in
potential competitive sources of ancillary services.
Appendix A: Research Gaps
A-3
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 99 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
•
Exploration of the effectiveness of various types of in-home displays.
•
Exploration of impacts that the battery life of various home area network devices
and in-home displays will have on residential participation in demand response
programs.
•
Exploration of impacts on appliance/electronics longevity that are cycled on/off by
demand response programs.
•
Research consumer willingness to sell back energy from micro-generation and home
storage to offset peak periods.
•
Best strategies to maximize deployment of demand response potential for states with
specific programs or needs, taking into account electric demand profile, generation
mix, preferred type of demand response programs and products, regional trends,
stakeholder views, and previous assessment research.
•
Curtailable load programs aimed at industrial customers, covering topics such as
potential benefits to all customers, cost recovery, rate design, and program
marketing.
•
The relationship of demand response to other state energy initiatives (e.g., energy
efficiency, renewable energy, smart grid). This research would explore how demand
response overlaps or complements these other initiatives and where management
and oversight could be leveraged or combined.
•
Understanding the interest of elected officials, regulatory agencies, utilities and
load-serving entities, RTOs/ISOs, other demand response providers, and third-party
vendors in making demand response a priority.
•
The ability to integrate large-scale renewable energy resources and electric vehicles,
which is critical to advance the benefits of demand response.
•
The impact of distributed generation as a resource that can be integrated more
effectively in conjunction with demand response.
•
An assessment of the location impacts of demand response.
•
A-4
Economic and reliability impacts of PHEVs as they penetrate the market.
A study that identifies the load and peak demand profiles of the electricity control
areas.
Appendix A: Research Gaps
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 100 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
APPENDIX B:
Examples of Demand
Response Programs
T
his appendix presents a few examples of demand response retail and wholesale programs
around the United States. To put these case studies in context, Figure 5, which is taken
from the National Assessment, shows the regional variation in the national potential for
demand response.
Figure 5: Regional Demand Response Potential
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-1
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 101 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Retail Programs
Arizona
Arizona is a state with vertically integrated investor-owned and publicly owned utilities. It
has very hot summers that bring with them a large reliance on central air conditioning. To
curtail growth in peak loads, the two major utilities — the Arizona Public Service Company
and the Salt River Project — have offered time-of-use (TOU) pricing programs to their
residential customers for more than two decades. 94 During this time, they have attracted
some 30 to 40 percent of the residential market. 95 For example, the Salt River Project has
more than 222,000 TOU customers, or about 25 percent of its electric customers, which is the
third-largest TOU initiative in the United States. 96 Typical TOU customers on this program
lower their bill by 7 percent. 97 What is noteworthy is that these effects were obtained
without the intervention of enabling technologies.
This case study indicates that even without enabling technologies, significant customer
participation can be achieved in time-based rates if they are well-designed and marketed, and
that these rates can successfully lower peak demand for many years.
California
California is a leader in exploring and expanding demand response. For instance, the
California Energy Commission issued regulations instituting mandatory TOU pricing for large
commercial and industrial customers in 1978. In addition, regulations for appliance and
building energy consumption 98 are a major reason that per capita electricity use in California
has stayed constant during the past three decades, while the per capita consumption in the
United States has grown appreciably. 99 Later, during the western energy crisis of 2000–2001,
California developed an Energy Action Plan that specified a loading order of resources: first,
energy efficiency; second, demand response; third, renewable energy sources; and finally,
conventional generation options. 100
94
More information about these programs can be found at
http://www.srpnet.com/prices/home/tou.aspx (Salt River Project) and
http://www.aps.com/aps_services/residential/rateplans/Default.html (Arizona Public Service
Company).
95
eMeter, Demand Response: An eMeter White Paper Presentation (2008).
96
Salt River Project, Navigating Change: SRP 2009 Annual Report, at 7 (2009), available at
http://www.srpnet.com/about/financial/2009AnnualReport/siteassets/pdfx/2009SRPAnnualReport.pdf.
97
Id.
98
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 20, §§ 1601–1608 (2009) (efficiency standards for appliances); Cal. Code Regs.
tit. 24.
99
California Energy Commission, 2007 Integrated Energy Policy Report, at 3–4 (2007).
100
State of California, Energy Action Plan, at 4 (2003).
B-2
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 102 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
The Energy Action Plan also set a target reduction in peak demand of 5 percent for 2007. 101
When California’s three investor-owned electric utilities only achieved 40 percent of that
target in 2007, they were asked to revamp their efforts. Simultaneously, the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved business cases for the deployment of advanced
metering initiatives (AMI) by all three utilities 102 and then issued a landmark ruling making
dynamic pricing the default tariff for all nonresidential customers who were part of AMI. In
addition, California operates the “Flex Your Power” campaign to promote customer awareness
of pending energy shortages and to encourage them to curtail energy use. 103 This program has
achieved very high levels of brand recognition because it is featured in a number of
prominent places such as billboards, train stations, and websites, as well as on postmarks.
California also carried out the nation’s first comprehensive test with dynamic pricing, known
as the Statewide Pricing Pilot, which involved approximately 2,500 residential and small
commercial and industrial customers. 104 The results of the Statewide Pricing Pilot provided
information about the likely amount that customers would lower their peak demand at
different price levels, both with and without enabling technologies. 105 In addition, a large
number of participants elected to continue on the experimental rates despite a new metering
charge, indicating that participants were satisfied with the experimental rates. 106 Overall, the
experiment showed that if customers are fully informed, they are more likely to participate in
dynamic pricing programs.
This case study indicates that if a state makes a strong commitment to dynamic pricing, it can
achieve a significant reduction in peak demand; that enabling technologies can further boost
impacts; and that by making demand response the default option, large numbers of customers
can be induced to participate in demand response.
Connecticut
The Connecticut legislature passed legislation that required electric distribution companies to
conduct integrated resource planning beginning on January 1, 2008. 107 The identified
resource needs must first be met through all available energy efficiency and demand
101
Id.
102
See, e.g., Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Decision Adopting Dynamic Pricing Timetable and Rate
Design Guidance for Pacific Gas & Electric Company, D. 08-07-045 (2008).
103
For more information about the Flex Your Power campaign, visit http://www.fypower.org/.
104
For more general information about the pilot program and its results, see Charles River Association,
Impact Evaluation of the California Statewide Pricing Pilot (2005), available at
http://sites.energetics.com/madri/toolbox/pdfs/pricing/cra_2005_impact_eval_ca_pricing_pilot.pdf.
105
See id.
106
San Francisco Community Power, Statewide Pricing Pilot — Track B End of Pilot Focus Group Results 2
(2005), available at http://www.sfpower.org/SFCP_TrackB_FocusGroups.pdf (finding strong statistical
support that customers wanted to remain on the critical peak pricing rates).
107
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16a-3a (2008).
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-3
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 103 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
reduction resources that are cost-effective, reliable, and feasible. 108 Among other things, the
electric distribution companies’ procurement plans must specify the amount of demand-side
measures, such as demand response, that can meet the capacity planning needs. 109
In summer 2009, Connecticut Light & Power ran a pilot program for demand response to
discover how to most effectively reduce electricity usage during peak periods when demand
for electricity reaches a critical level. 110 Data from this program have been analyzed, and the
results have led to a number of conclusions about customer response to prices, both with and
without various enabling technologies. 111
This case study indicates that legislation can be passed that encourages the use of demand
response. It also shows how pilot programs are being implemented.
Delaware
Legislation in Delaware requires Delaware Power & Light to conduct integrated resource
planning, commencing December 1, 2006. 112 This biennial resource report requires Delaware
Power & Light to project a 10-year supply and demand forecast. Additionally, Delaware
Power & Light must propose the resource mix to meet its long-term obligations over the 10year period, including the use of demand-side management programs. 113
This case study is an example of legislation that has been passed to encourage the use of
demand response for integrated resource planning.
Florida
In the panhandle of Florida, Gulf Power, a subsidiary of Southern Company, has been
operating the Energy Select (formerly known as the Good Cents SELECT program) since the
early 1990s. 114 This program includes an automated energy management system for homes
that comes with a critical-peak pricing (CPP) tariff. The average rate is around 8 cents per
kilowatt-hour, and the CPP tariff applied during the top 1 percent of the hours is four times
higher. 115 The system controls four end-uses: air conditioning, space heating, water heating,
108
Id., § 16a-3a(c).
109
Id.
110
Connecticut Light and Power, Plan-It Wise Energy Program, http://www.clp.com/home/saveenergy/goinggreen/planitwise.aspx ( 2009).
111
“CL&P Energy Program Pilot Customers Respond to Price Signals,” Transmission & Distribution World
(2010), available at http://tdworld.com/customer_service/clp-energy-program-20100101/.
112
Del. Code Ann. tit. 26, § 1002(4) (2009).
113
Id.
114
Gulf Power, Energy Select (2009), http://www.gulfpower.com/energyselect/index.asp.
115
Gulf Management Company, Good Cents SELECT: Advanced Energy Management Program, at slide 6
(2006), available at http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r3/nwflorida/presentations/01_19_06.ppt.
B-4
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 104 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
and swimming pool pumps. Some 8,000 customers subscribe to the program and save up to
15 percent on their monthly energy bills after paying a monthly fee of about $5 a month. 116
Gulf Power estimates that the program induces a drop of 2 kW per participating customer,
amounting to approximately 40 to 50 percent of customer load during the top 1 percent of the
hours of the year. 117 The program is generating interest among other Florida utilities as well.
One utility is running a pilot to test customer acceptance and response. The pilot is being
closely tracked by the other utilities.
Florida Power & Light’s (FPL’s) demand response program, “On Call,” is one of the largest
load management systems (LMSs) in the nation. At the end of 2008, FPL's goal was to
provide 973 MW of load control during times of high demand on its system. The system uses
more than 900,000 load control transponders connecting more than 780,000 users, and the
load control capability is 984 MW. FPL uses a power line communications system that offers
many control strategies enabled by a two-way communications feature. When managed
effectively, this system can be an attractive economic alternative when compared with the
total cost of adding new peak load power generating plants.
An essential element of the success of the program is keeping customers enrolled in the
program and maintaining the equipment in the field to ensure that the system delivers the
demand reduction that is expected by the system operators. About 1.5 percent of the
customers who have the LMS field equipment installed in their home call the customer care
center with questions. These calls can be as simple as a request to add additional appliances to
the load control program, although in other cases, customer service representatives may have
to respond to a customer's perception that their participating appliances failed because of the
installed LMS equipment. Employees specially trained in LMS (including a basic electrical
knowledge of air conditioning, water heaters, and pool pump operation/wiring) help reduce
customer dropouts from the system and ensure continued customer participation.
FPL customers benefit from the On Call load control program because it allows FPL to
maintain a consistent supply of power generation during times of peak demand. The demand
reduction enabled by On Call customers has helped keep electric rates low by deferring the
need to build three power plants since the program’s inception, which also helps protect the
environment. 118
This case study indicates that dynamic pricing coupled with enabling technologies can bring
about substantial savings to both the utility and the customer.
116
Id.
117
Thompson J, Gulf Power, Presentation for the Southeast Energy Efficiency Meeting, at 14 (2007),
available at http://www.epa.gov/RDEE/documents/southeastmeeting/thompson_southeast_energy_efficiency_meeting_atlanta_ga.pdf (discussing real-time
pricing and the Good Sense SELECT program at Gulf Power).
118
E-mail from Julie Kreafle, Manager, Product Marketing, Florida Power and Light Company, to Ahmad
Faruqui (Sep. 16, 2009, 9:47 PM ET) (on file with The Brattle Group).
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-5
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 105 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Georgia
Since the mid-1990s, Georgia Power has operated the nation’s largest real-time pricing
program directed at large commercial and industrial customers. 119 Its current subscribers
include approximately 1,200 medium to large industrial and commercial customers (greater
than 250 kW), amounting to more than 4,000 MW of summer peak demand. 120 Most of the
customers participate in the day-ahead program, in which they receive information on the
next day’s hourly prices on the afternoon of the previous day. About 100 of the largest
industrial customers participate in an hour-ahead program, in which customers receive a dayahead forecast of hourly prices, but only an hour’s notice of the firm price in the next hour.
Customers are offered a variety of price protection products to shield them from price
volatility. They can chose the combination of risk exposure that best matches their attitudes
toward risk and their ability to adjust their operations in response to variations in the price of
power. The maximum load reductions on the moderate price day are approximately 4
percent for day-ahead customers and 10 percent for hour-ahead customers. On the highprice day, estimated load reductions rise to 7 percent for day-ahead customers and 30 percent
for hour-ahead customers. 121
This case study indicates that real-time pricing is feasible and cost-effective for medium and
large commercial and industrial customers and that well-designed programs can recruit large
numbers of participants to real-time pricing in this market segment. It also shows that price
protection and other risk management products may feasibly be included in demand response
programs.
Illinois
In June 2006, Illinois legislation enabled real-time pricing. 122 Each electric utility servicing at
least 100,000 customers was required to file a tariff allowing residential customers to elect
real-time pricing by January 2007. In setting the tariff, each electric utility was required, at a
minimum, to describe its methodology and the manner in which real-time customers would
have access to hourly and day-ahead prices.
To implement real-time pricing, each electric utility was required to install a meter that is
capable of recording hourly intervals of energy use for each customer that elects real-time
pricing. In addition, each utility was entitled to recover incurred costs in implementing real-
119
O’Sheasy M, “How to Buy High and Sell Low: Spot Priced Electricity Offers Financial Rewards,” Pricing
in Competitive Electricity Markets 295 (2000).
120
Braithwait S, Evaluating Changes in RTP Price Response — The Effect of Market and Environmental
Conditions, prepared for the International Energy Program Evaluation Conference Proceedings in New
York (2005).
121
Id.
122
2005 Ill. Laws 977 (amending 220 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/16-101A, 16-102, 16-107).
B-6
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 106 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
time pricing. These costs were imposed on all customers — those who elected to participate
in a real-time pricing rate and those who did not.
At the end of 2007, the first full year required under the law, Commonwealth Edison had
3,334 and Ameren had 500 active participants in their respective residential real-time pricing
programs. In that year, average bill savings for all participants in the Commonwealth Edison
program was about 13 percent. 123 Ameren participants, on the other hand, had a total savings
of 16 percent compared with what the same bill would have been under the flat rate. 124
By the end of 2008, Commonwealth Edison and Ameren had increased their enrollments to
5,838 and 3,147 active participants, respectively, though average bill savings fell to 2.5
percent for all participants in the Commonwealth Edison program 125 and 9 percent in the
Ameren program. 126
This case study indicates that legislation can be used to encourage dynamic pricing. Also,
real-time pricing rates are feasible for residential customers, and they can achieve significant
savings in the residential market.
Massachusetts
In July 2008, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the Green Communities Act, a
comprehensive energy reform bill. 127 Among its many features, this law makes energy
efficiency programs compete in the market with traditional energy supply. Utility companies
are now required to purchase all available energy efficiency improvements that cost less than
it does to generate power. Additionally, utility companies are now required to offer rebates
and other incentives for customers to upgrade lighting, air conditioning, and industrial
equipment to more efficient models whenever those incentives cost less than generating the
electricity it would take to power older, less-efficient equipment. 128
123
Comverge, Inc., ComEd Residential Real-Time Program – 2007 Annual Report, Illinois Commerce
Commission Docket No. 06-0617 (filed on April 30, 2008), available at
http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=06-0617&docId=123573.
124
Ameren Illinois Utilities, RSP Rider — Power Smart Pricing — 2007 Annual Report, Illinois Commerce
Commission Docket No. 06-0691 (filed April 15, 2008), available at
http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=06-0691&docId=123030.
125
Comverge, Inc., ComEd Residential Real-Time Pricing Program – 2008 Revised Annual Report, Docket
No. 06-0617 (filed on April 28, 2009), available at
http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=06-0617&docid=136091.
126
Ameren Illinois Utilities, Rider PSP — Power Smart Pricing — 2008 Annual Report, Illinois Commerce
Commission Docket No. 06-0621 (filed on April 30, 2009), available at
http://www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/files.aspx?no=06-0691&docId=136151.
127
2008 Mass. Acts 50 (amending Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 164B, § 116(a) (2009)).
128
Governor Deval Patrick, Governor Patrick Signs Energy Bill Promoting Cost Savings, Renewable and
Clean Energy Technology (2008), available at
http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=gov3pressrelease&L=1&L0=Home&sid=Agov3&b=pressrelease&f=08
0702_bill_energy_clean&csid=Agov3.
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-7
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 107 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Michigan
In January 2007, the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) submitted its 21st Century
Electric Energy Plan 129 in response to an executive order from the governor the year before.
One of the recommendations in the energy plan is that Michigan’s PSC be authorized to
require the use of active load management measures by utilities (forecasted to reduce demand
by 570 MW in 10 years). The plan also recommends pilot programs employing advanced
metering infrastructure to provide real-time price information to customers.
In Consumers Energy’s Balanced Energy Initiative, the company forecasted that load
management, demand response, and interruptible load programs would reduce retail peak by
9.3 percent by 2030. 130 The reduction would be implemented through a comprehensive AMI
program that includes central air conditioning load management and demand response
programs for residential and small commercial customers. This program would reduce peak
demand as well as ongoing energy requirements. 131
Consumers Energy plans to conduct a demand response and information pilot aimed at
assessing customer behavior in the smart grid environment. The centerpiece of this pilot is a
randomized program that places AMI-enabled customers into various dynamic pricing and
information treatments while comparing them with strategic control groups.
The research is distinguishable from previous demand response pilot programs because it will
1) carefully use treatment randomization to achieve internal and external validity and 2)
address a set of questions that extends beyond a standard investigation of load-shifting
behavior. 132 At a high level, this research aims to:
•
Understand how dynamic pricing can best be incorporated into Consumers Energy’s
portfolio.
•
Understand consumer responses to dynamic electricity pricing, during both peak
and off-peak periods (to examine demand shifting vs. demand reduction).
•
Evaluate whether automated demand response technology enhances consumer
responses to dynamic pricing.
129
Lark JP, Michigan’s 21st Century Electric Energy Plan (2007), available at
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mpsc/21stcenturyenergyplan_185274_7.pdf.
130
Consumers Energy Company, Electric Generation Alternatives Analysis for Proposed Permit to Install
No. 341-07 for an Advanced Supercritical Pulverized Coal Boiler at the Karn-Weadock Generating
Station, MPSC Case No. U-15996 (filed with the Mich. Pub. Serv. Commn. June 5, 2009).
131
In 2018, air conditioning load management is projected to be able to reduce peak demand by 308
MW. Customer demand response programs associated with AMI are projected to provide further peak
load reduction of 212 MW by 2018.
132
E-mail from Mark Lesiw, AMI Senior Program Manager of Load Management, Consumers Energy, to
Ahmad Faruqui (Sep. 2, 2009, 1:19 PM ET) (on file with The Brattle Group).
B-8
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 108 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
Compare consumer response to CPP against critical peak rebates.
•
Understand consumer responses to real-time provision of information regarding
electricity usage, during both peak and off-peak periods.
•
Evaluate potential climate change mitigation impacts of demand response programs
and information provision.
•
Evaluate the extent to which participation in demand response and/or information
programs motivates lasting energy efficiency improvements.
•
Evaluate the heterogeneity of responses to these programs across subpopulations.
While the CPP and real-time pricing programs may appeal to many of Consumers Energy’s
customers, a portion of their customer base may prefer a different, potentially less involved
program that can provide them with opportunities to reduce their bills while requiring
minimal action on their part. To provide these customers with a program of that nature,
Consumers Energy will concurrently roll out Load Management and advanced Direct Load
Control programs that will leverage AMI investment. 133
In addition to future efforts, demand reduction has been conducted in Michigan for many
years. Detroit Edison maintains a significant Direct Load Control Interruptible Air
Conditioning (IAC) 134 program, which was established more than 20 years ago during the
days of demand-side management. IAC has grown to more than 280,000 enrolled customers
(of 1.9 million total customers, with a 79.1 percent central air conditioning saturation) 135 who
receive a $0.02 rate break during the cooling months of June–October in exchange for the
possibility of interruption by the company via remote control relays. This pricing structure is
unique because it provides a discount on the hourly rate instead of a fixed amount monthly
credit.
The current diversified per customer load reduction is 0.85 kW, which is down considerably
from approximately 1.2 kW 10 years ago. This decrease in load reduction is due to the
increase in efficiency of central air conditioning units over the years. 136
The IAC program is intended to help curtail peak load during emergency or high price
periods. It is also utilized as capacity reserve, as it is available within 10 minutes. The
program is a cycling program at 15-minute on/off intervals that is capable of shedding up to
133
Id.
134
DTE Energy, Interruptible Air Conditioning Rate (2009),
http://www.dteenergy.com/residentialCustomers/billingPayment/rates/electric/
interruptibleRates.html.
135
E-mail from Mark Williamson, Manager, Load Research, DTE Energy, to Ahmad Faruqui (Aug. 31,
2009, 1:21 PM ET) (on file with The Brattle Group).
136
Id.
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-9
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 109 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
230 MW of load on days over 90 degrees Fahrenheit. IAC may be cycled for no more than 8
hours within a 24-hour period. 137
In addition, the program is used for localized substation load relief. Detroit Edison developed
a remote control program using IAC customers (identified by the substation serving them)
that is capable of interrupting only customers taking service within substation-serviced
areas. 138 This program has proven very successful at relieving load on overloaded substations
and avoiding localized circuit rotation, brownouts, and, in extreme cases, the loss of a
substation transformer. 139
This case study is an example of legislation being passed to encourage new types of demand
response programs to complement existing, successful programs.
Washington, D.C.
It is very expensive and time-consuming to change billing systems and processes for sending
bills to customers. Instead of overhauling the entire billing system and the process of mailing
bills, it is possible to include a simple dynamic pricing line item adjustment in the current
billing system and provide a detailed explanation of this dynamic pricing adjustment in a bill
insert. An example of such a demand response bill insert, provided from Washington‘s
PowerCentsDC pilot program, 140 is provided in Figure 6. This example is not the actual bill
that pilot program participants receive. Rather, this is supplemental information included as
an insert with the actual bill. 141
This case study provides an example of a billing structure that considers the many regulatory
and information technology factors surrounding the billing of customers.
137
E-mail from Mark Williamson, Manager, Load Research, DTE Energy, to Ahmad Faruqui (Aug. 31,
2009, 9:48 AM ET) (on file with The Brattle Group).
138
See MacDonald T, The Localized Substation Load Relief Program at Detroit Edison, Presentation for
AEIC National Conference (2006), PowerPoint available at
http://www.aeic.org/load_research/docs/15_2006_09_The_Localized_Substation_Load_Relief_Progra
m_at_Detroit_Edison_presentation_.ppt.
139
See id.
140
For more information about this pilot program, please visit http://www.powercentsdc.org/.
141
E-mails from Chris King, eMeter, to Ahmad Faruqui (Aug. 30, 2009, 2:08 AM ET; Sept. 1, 2009,
10:15 AM ET) (on file with The Brattle Group).
B-10
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 110 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Figure 6: PowerCentsDC Pilot Program Sample Bill
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
B-11
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 111 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
Wholesale Programs
RTO and ISO program offerings are summarized in Table 3. 142
Table 3: Wholesale Programs
Name
California ISO
Participating Load
Program
Participating Load
Program
Service
Type
Energy
Reserve
Electric Reliability Council of Texas
Emergency Interruptible
Capacity
Load Service
Loads Acting as a
Resource Providing
Responsive Reserve
Reserve
Service — Under
Frequency Relay Type
Loads Acting as a
Resource Providing
Responsive Reserve
Service — Controllable
Load Resource Type
Loads Acting as a
Resource Providing NonSpinning Reserve
Service
Controllable Load
Resources Providing
Regulation Service
ISO-New England
Real Time Demand
Response Program
(Capacity Component)
Real Time Demand
Response Program
(Energy Component)
Day-Ahead Load
Response Program for
RTDRP
142
Trigger
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Market bid (capacity
bid and separate
energy bid > offer
price)
Response Time
1 hour
10 minutes
Reliability
10 minutes
Reliability (automatic
relay)
0.5 seconds (automatic
relay) or 10 minutes
(phone)
Reserve
Reliability
Continuous, similar to
governor action by a
generator; and 10minute response for
remaining obligation to
electronic instruction
Reserve
Reliability
30 minutes
Regulation
Reliability
Effectively
instantaneous
Capacity
Reliability
10 minutes/30 minutes
Energy
Reliability
10 minutes/30 minutes
Energy
Market bid (dayahead LMP = or >
offer price)
Effectively
instantaneous
The information is adapted from the ISO/RTO Council’s North American Wholesale Electricity Demand
Response Program Comparison, available at http://www.isorto.org/atf/cf/%7B5B4E85C6-7EAC-40A08DC3003829518EBD%7D/IRC%20DR%20M&V%20Standards%20Implementation%20Comparison%20(20
09-04-28).xls.
B-12
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
Page 112 of 119
12
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
Service
Type
ISO-New England (continued)
Day-Ahead Load
Response Program for
Energy
RTPR
Demand Response
Reserve
Reserves Pilot
Name
Real Time Price
Response Program
Real Time Demand
Response Resource
FCM: On-Peak, Seasonal
Peak Resources
Real Time Emergency
Generation Resource
Midwest ISO
Emergency Demand
Response
Demand Response
Resource Type I
Demand Response
Resource Type I
Demand Response
Resource Type II
Demand Response
Resource Type II
Demand Response
Resource Type II
Load Modifying
Resource
New York ISO
6
6
6
3
6
Trigger
Response Time
Market bid (dayahead LMP = or >
offer price)
Effectively
instantaneous
Reliability
30 minutes
Energy
Market bid (dayahead or forecast
real-time LMP = or >
$100/MWh)
Effectively
instantaneous
Capacity
Reliability
30 minutes
Capacity
Reliability
Capacity
Reliability
Energy
Reliability
Energy
Reserve
Energy
Reserve
Regulation
Capacity
Day-Ahead Demand
Response Program
Energy
Demand Side Ancillary
Services Program
Reserve
Demand Side Ancillary
Services Program
Reserve
Effectively
instantaneous
Effectively
instantaneous
Resource-specific
(biddable parameter)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
Effectively
instantaneous
Reliability
—
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
(security-constrained
unit commitment)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
(security-constrained
economic dispatch)
(10 minute ramp)
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
(security-constrained
economic dispatch)
(10 minute/30 minute
ramp)
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
5 minutes
10 minutes
5 minutes
10 minutes
—
10 minutes
10 minutes/30 minutes
B-13
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 113 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
Name
6
6
6
6
3
6
Service
Type
Trigger
Response Time
Regulation
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
(security-constrained
economic dispatch)
Effectively
instantaneous
Energy
Reliability
2 hours
Energy
Reliability
2 hours
Capacity
Reliability
2 hours
New York ISO (continued)
Demand Side Ancillary
Services Program
Emergency Demand
Response Program
Installed Capacity
Special Case Resources
(Energy Component)
Installed Capacity
Special Case Resources
(Capacity Component)
PJM
Economic Load
Response
Economic Load
Response
Economic Load
Response
Economic Load
Response
Emergency Load
Response — Energy Only
Full Emergency Load
Response (Capacity
Component)
Full Emergency Load
Response (Energy
Component)
Southwest Power Pool
Variable Dispatch
Demand Response
Energy
Reserve
Reserve
Market bid (selfscheduled, cleared
day-ahead bid, or
real-time dispatch)
Reliability (one hour
notice)
Reliability (day-ahead
notice)
Resource-specific
10 minutes
30 minutes
Effectively
instantaneous
1 hour or 2 hours
(participant-selected)
Regulation
Reliability
Energy
Reliability
Capacity
Reliability
1 hour or 2 hours
(participant-selected)
Energy
Reliability
1 hour or 2 hours
(participant-selected)
Energy
Market bid (energy
price > offer price)
(security-constrained
economic dispatch)
5 minutes
FCM: forward capacity market
LMP: locational marginal price
MWh: megawatt-hour
RTDRP: real-time demand response program
RTPR: real-time price response
B-14
Appendix B: Examples of Demand Response Programs
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
12
Page 114 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
APPENDIX C:
List of Commenters
T
he following commenters presented comments at the Technical Conference held at the
Commission’s headquarters on November 19–20, 2009:
•
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Ken Baker
•
Illinois Commerce Commission, Sherman Elliott
•
Florida Power & Light, John Haney
•
Demand Response Coordinating Committee, Dan Delurey
•
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Jim Parks
•
Hess Corporation, Jay Kooper
•
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, David Mohre
•
Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, Janine Migden-Ostrander
•
Alcoa, Inc., Walter Brockway
•
ISO-New England, Inc., Henry Yoshimura
•
Energy Curtailment Specialists, Paul Tyno
•
To the Point, Judith Schwartz
•
General Electric, Mary Bell
•
IBM Energy and Utilities, Don Mak
The following submitted written comments to the Commission in response to the Discussion
Draft:
•
American Public Power Association
•
Brett Feldman
•
California Department of Water Resources State Water Project
•
California Public Utilities Commission
•
Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc.
Appendix C: List of Commenters
C-1
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
12
Page 115 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
•
•
Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition
•
Demand Response Coordinating Committee
•
District of Columbia Public Service Commission
•
Edison Electric Institute
•
Electricity Consumers Resource Council
•
Energy Curtailment Specialists, Inc.
•
Environmental Defense Fund
•
Federal Trade Commission
•
Hess Corporation
•
heyCoop, LLC
•
Ice Energy, Inc.
•
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
•
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
•
National Grid USA
•
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
•
New York State Public Service Commission
•
North America Power Partners LLC
•
North American Electric Reliability Corporation
•
Occidental Chemical Corp. et al.
•
Ohio Public Utilities Commission
•
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
•
Peak Load Management Alliance (Aztech Associates, Inc., Comverge, Inc., CPower,
Inc., Energy Curtailment Specialists, Schneider Electric, Southern California Edison,
and Summit Blue Consulting)
•
C-2
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. and Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.
Portland General Electric Co.
Appendix C: List of Commenters
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 116 of 119
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
3
6
6
6
6
•
Robert Borlick
•
San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
•
Smart Grid Library (Christine Hertzog)
•
Southern California Edison Co.
•
Steel Producers
•
Tendril Networks, Inc.
•
To the Point
•
Utilimetrics
•
Utility Economic Engineers (Mark B. Lively)
•
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
•
3
6
PSEG Companies
•
6
Project for Sustainable FERC Energy Policy
•
6
Ziphany, LLC
The following submitted written comments to the Commission in response to the Draft
National Action Plan:
•
American Electric Power Service Corp.
•
American Public Power Association
•
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers
•
California Public Utilities Commission
•
Demand Response Coordinating Committee
•
Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition
•
Edison Electric Institute
•
Electric Power Supply Association
•
Energy Curtailment Specialists
•
EnerNOC, Inc.
•
GE Energy
Appendix C: List of Commenters
C-3
USCA Case #13-1093
12
Document #1563464
12
12
Filed: 07/21/2015
12
12
Page 117 of 119
12
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
•
Ice Energy, Inc.
•
Illinois Commerce Commission
•
Indicated New York Transmission owners
•
ISO New England
•
Judith Schwartz
•
Maine Public Utilities Commission
•
Maryland Public Service Commission
•
Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities
•
Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc.
•
North American Energy Standards Board
•
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
•
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
•
National Energy Marketers Association
•
National Grid
•
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
•
New York Independent System Operator
•
Public Interest Organizations/Project for Sustainable FERC Energy Policy
•
San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
•
Southern California Edison Co.
•
Southern Company
•
Tendril Networks, Inc.
•
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
•
3
6
Gridwise Architectural Council
•
C-4
12
3
9
3
9
9
3
3
N A T I 9O N A L A C T I O N P L A N 3 O N D E M A N D 9 R E S P O N9 S E
9
Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Appendix C: List of Commenters
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Page 118 of 119
USCA Case #13-1093
Document #1563464
Filed: 07/21/2015
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20426
National Action Plan on Demand Response
Docket No. AD09-10
June 17, 2010
Page 119 of 119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?