Rollins v. Reed et al (INMATE2)
JUDGMENT; that the plaintiff's objections 43 are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judges recommendation 40 is adopted; (3) Defendants' motion for summary judgment 23 is granted;(4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudic e because the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies; It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 2/24/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM AARON ROLLINS, Plaintiff, v. KEITH REED, etc., et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv33-MHT (WO)
JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 43) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's
recommendation (Doc. No. 40) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 23) is granted.
administrative remedies. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 24th day of February, 2010.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?