Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER directing that (1) The 32 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the defendants' 27 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; (3) Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants; (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff; and (5) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/17/10. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND MATHIS, AIS #140252, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF ANDY R. HUGHES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) )CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-371-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) )
On July 28, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 32) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED; The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants; The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff; and This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Done this 17th day of August, 2010.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?