Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE1)

Filing 32

FINAL JUDGMENT; (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 30 is adopted. (2) The defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, with the plai ntiff taking nothing by his complaint. (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff, for which the execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 9/20/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE1) Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND MATHIS, #140252, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF ANDY R. HUGHES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-CV-412-MHT [WO] ) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) adopted. (2) (3) The defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, with The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 30) is the plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff, for which the execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 20th day of September, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?