Swilling v. Astrue

Filing 31

FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 30 Memorandum Opinion entered in this case, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be and is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; sosts are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/22/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RUBY SWILLING o/b/o L.G.M.W.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv981-CSC
(WO)

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered in this case, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner denying
benefits be and is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED
with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue.
Done this 22nd day of July, 2011.

/s/Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE