Swilling v. Astrue

Filing 31

FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 30 Memorandum Opinion entered in this case, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be and is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; sosts are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/22/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RUBY SWILLING o/b/o L.G.M.W., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv981-CSC (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered in this case, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be and is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Done this 22nd day of July, 2011. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?