Goines v. Clemmons et al (INMATE 2)
FINAL JUDGMENT; it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of the Dfts, and against Plf Reginald B. Goines and that the Plf take nothing by his said suit; further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all c osts herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against the Plf, for which let execution issue; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 11/23/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
-CSC Goines v. Clemmons et al (INMATE 2)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION REGINALD B. GOINES, #65067, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD E. CLEMMONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-794-ID ) [WO] ) ) )
In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the Court, it is CONSIDERED, O R D E R E D , and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of th e Defendants, and against Plaintiff Reginald B. Goines and that the Plaintiff take nothing b y his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the s a m e are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final ju d g m e n t pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 23rd day of November, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?