Rykard v. City of Dothan

Filing 37

JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Defendant City of Dothan's 23 motion for summary judgment is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Dothan and against plaintiff Kristen Rykard, with plaintiff Rykard taking nothing by her compl aint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Rykard, for which execution may issue. The clerk of this court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/28/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) term: PTC set for 01/05/2012; JT set for 02/06/2012 (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION KRISTEN RYKARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv868-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant City of Dothan’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 23) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Dothan and against plaintiff Kristen Rykard, with plaintiff Rykard taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Rykard, for which execution may issue. The clerk of this court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 28th day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?