Manning et al v. Mason et al

Filing 47

ORDER that upon consideration of 46 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice All Claims Against John C. Mason, Robert S. Breed, and the City of Enterprise, it is ORDERED: that all claims against defendants Mason, Breed and the City of Enterprise are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs; that plaintiff's claims as set forth in the complaint remain against defendant Joe Moore; that defendant's 42 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (cc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LUCIUS MANNING, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN C. MASON, et al.,
Defendants

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-925-MEF
(WO)

ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice All Claims
Against John C. Mason, Robert S. Breed, and the City of Enterprise (Doc. #46) filed on
June 23, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. That all claims against defendants Mason, Breed and the City of Enterprise are
DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.
2. That plaintiff's claims as set forth in the complaint remain against defendant Joe
Moore.
3. That defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #42) is
DENIED as moot.
th

DONE this the 24 day of June, 2011.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE