Glanton v. Michelin North America USA(MAG+)
Filing
25
OPINION stating that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's 24 recommendation, to which there are no objections, should be adopted. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/1/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
LESSIE GLANTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA
USA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:11cv260-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
Plaintiff Lessie Glanton filed this lawsuit charging
defendant Michelin North America, USA, with employment
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e
to 2000e-17.
This lawsuit is now before the court on the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that
Glanton’s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of
prosecution.
After an independent and de novo review of
the
the
record,
court
concludes
that
the
magistrate
judge’s recommendation, to which there are no objections,
should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 1st day of December, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?