Glanton v. Michelin North America USA(MAG+)

Filing 25

OPINION stating that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's 24 recommendation, to which there are no objections, should be adopted. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/1/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION LESSIE GLANTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA USA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv260-MHT (WO) OPINION Plaintiff Lessie Glanton filed this lawsuit charging defendant Michelin North America, USA, with employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that Glanton’s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. After an independent and de novo review of the the record, court concludes that the magistrate judge’s recommendation, to which there are no objections, should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 1st day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?