Robinson v. Hughes, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 55

ORDER directing that: (1.) The 49 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2.) The 32 motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED; (3.) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/12/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES ROBINSON, #121865,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDY HUGHES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-681-MEF

ORDER
On November 16, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #49)
in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED.
3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
th

DONE this the 12 day of December, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE