Barkley v. City of Dothan, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 6

OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereb y ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/8/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDREW KEITH BARKLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv891-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On November 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Done this the 8 th day of December, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?