Barkley v. City of Dothan, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 6

OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereb y ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/8/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANDREW KEITH BARKLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DOTHAN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv891-TMH
(WO)

OPINION and ORDER
On November 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5). Upon an independent review of the
file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it
is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice
prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
Done this the 8 th day of December, 2011.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE