Flowers v. Patrick et al

Filing 26

ORDER directing that, upon consideration of Plaintiff's 25 motion, which the Court construes as a motion for an order of dismissal, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's claims ag ainst Michael Patrick are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his own costs; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/8/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR)(Term'd: Final PTC 11/01/2013 and Jury Trial 12/02/2013) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL FLOWERS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL PATRICK, Defendant. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1099-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. #25), which the Court construes as a motion for an order of dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #25), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff’s claims against Michael Patrick are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his own costs. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 8th day of May, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?