Bagley v. Cash (CONSENT)

Filing 21

FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 19 memorandum opinion and based on the parties' 20 joint stipulation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff and a gainst the defendant on its breach of contract claim, and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED damages in the amount of $7,350,000.00 in compensatory damages; further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudi ce, and no costs taxed herein; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/1/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES W. BAGLEY, TRUSTEE OF THE BAGLEY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PETER L. CASH, Defendant. CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:12cv620-CSC (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion (doc. # 19) entered on January 12, 2013, and based on parties’ joint stipulation filed on February 1, 2013 (doc. # 20), and for good cause, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant on its breach of contract claim, and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED damages in the amount of $7,350,000.00 in compensatory damages. It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, and no costs taxed herein. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 1st day of February, 2013. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?