McBride v. Houston County Health Care Authority et al
Filing
396
FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT, it is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that, based on the 394 jury verdict, judgment is entered in favor of def Dinesh Karumanchi and against plf Courtney McBride, with plf McBridge taking nothi ng in her complaint against def Karumanchi; further ORDERING that because there is no just reason for delay, this judgment is entered as a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b); further ORDERING that costs are taxed agains t plf McBride, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/22/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
COURTNEY McBRIDE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DINESH KARUMANCHI,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:12cv1047-MHT
(WO)
FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT
On the 16th day of July 2015, after this cause had
been submitted to a jury, a verdict was returned as
follows:
“(1) Has plaintiff Courtney McBride
proved to your reasonable satisfaction
by substantial evidence that Lamictal
probably
caused
her
to
develop
Stevens-Johnson
Syndrome
(SJS)
or
Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN)?
Answer Yes or No
___YES____
If your answer is “No,” this ends
your deliberations. If your answer is
“Yes,” continue to the next question.
“(2)
Has
McBride
proved
to
your
reasonable satisfaction by substantial
evidence
that
defendant
Dinesh
Karumanchi breached the standard of
care in his treatment of her; and that
this breach probably caused harm to
her?
Answer Yes or No
____NO______
If you answered “No,” this ends
your deliberations. ....
SO SAY WE ALL.
_/s/ Joshua B. Hinson___
Foreperson’s Signature
DATE: ___16 July 2015____”
It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of
the court that, based on the verdict (doc. no. 394),
judgment
is
entered
in
favor
of
defendant
Dinesh
Karumanchi and against plaintiff Courtney McBride, with
plaintiff
McBride
taking
nothing
in
her
complaint
against defendant Karumanchi.
It is further ORDERED that, because there is no
just reason for delay, this judgment is entered as a
final
judgment
pursuant
to
Procedure 54(b).
2
federal
Rule
of
Civil
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff McBride, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 22nd day of July, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?