McBride v. Houston County Health Care Authority et al

Filing 396

FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT, it is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that, based on the 394 jury verdict, judgment is entered in favor of def Dinesh Karumanchi and against plf Courtney McBride, with plf McBridge taking nothi ng in her complaint against def Karumanchi; further ORDERING that because there is no just reason for delay, this judgment is entered as a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b); further ORDERING that costs are taxed agains t plf McBride, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/22/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION COURTNEY McBRIDE, Plaintiff, v. DINESH KARUMANCHI, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv1047-MHT (WO) FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT On the 16th day of July 2015, after this cause had been submitted to a jury, a verdict was returned as follows: “(1) Has plaintiff Courtney McBride proved to your reasonable satisfaction by substantial evidence that Lamictal probably caused her to develop Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN)? Answer Yes or No ___YES____ If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations. If your answer is “Yes,” continue to the next question. “(2) Has McBride proved to your reasonable satisfaction by substantial evidence that defendant Dinesh Karumanchi breached the standard of care in his treatment of her; and that this breach probably caused harm to her? Answer Yes or No ____NO______ If you answered “No,” this ends your deliberations. .... SO SAY WE ALL. _/s/ Joshua B. Hinson___ Foreperson’s Signature DATE: ___16 July 2015____” It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that, based on the verdict (doc. no. 394), judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dinesh Karumanchi and against plaintiff Courtney McBride, with plaintiff McBride taking nothing in her complaint against defendant Karumanchi. It is further ORDERED that, because there is no just reason for delay, this judgment is entered as a final judgment pursuant to Procedure 54(b). 2 federal Rule of Civil It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff McBride, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 22nd day of July, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson___ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?