Clark v. Bamberger et al
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion approving the settlements today, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, andDECREED as follows: (1) the 117 joint motion to approve settlement and distribution of settlement proceeds is GRANTED; (2) the settleme nt proposed by the parties is hereby APPROVED; (3) judgment is entered in favor of plf Jennifer Clark against defs Joey Bamberger and Rolls-Royce Corporation in the amount of $ 8 million; (4) judgment is entered in favor of plf Jennifer Clark a nd against Army Fleet Support, LLC and L-3 Communications Corporation in the amount of $500,000; (5) all other pending motions are denied as moot; (6) The clerk of the court shall, as soon as possible, disburse to plaintiff Clark's counsel all settlement funds held pursuant to the court's 122 order and appropriate accrued interest on thosefunds; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/28/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to Clerk & Finance.(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
JENNIFER CLARK, as
personal representative of )
the estate of Jeremy
JOEY BAMBERGER, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion approving
DECREED as follows:
distribution of settlement proceeds (doc. no. 117) is
Jennifer Clark and against defendants Joey Bamberger
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Clark
and against defendants Army Fleet Support, LLC and L-3
Communications Corporation in the amount of $ 500,000.
(5) All other pending motions are denied as moot.
(doc. no. 122) and appropiate accrued interest on those
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 28th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?