Hershewe v. Givens et al
Filing
153
JUDGMENT, because the court finds that these defendants are not necessary parties under FRCP 19, it is ORDERED, JUDGED, and DECREED that: (1) dfendants US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal, Inc.'s [113[ motion to dismiss is granted; (2) defs US Leg al Forms, Inc. and US Legal, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid; (3) defs US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal, Inc. are terminated as parties; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/24/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD HERSHEWE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
KEITH GIVENS, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:14cv655-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
Defendants US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal, Inc.
move
to
response,
included
dismiss
the
plaintiff
these
claims
Edward
defendants
against
Hershewe
out
of
them.
In
states
that
he
abundance
of
“an
his
caution” in case they were considered necessary parties
under the federal rules, but otherwise did not object
to their dismissal.
Because the court finds that these defendants are
not
necessary
parties
under
Federal
Rule
of
Civil
Procedure 19, it is ORDERED, JUDGED, and DECREED that:
(1) Defendants US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal,
Inc.’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 113) is granted.
(2) Defendants US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal,
Inc. are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed
as paid.
(3) Defendants US Legal Forms, Inc. and US Legal,
Inc. are terminated as parties.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?