Lomanack v. Boutwell et al
Filing
43
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant City of Ozark, Alabama's 41 objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 39 recommendation is adopted. (3) Defendant City of Oz ark, Alabama's 11 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: (a) The motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice as to the plaintiff's claims against unnamed, fictitious parties; plaintiff's claims for punit ive damages and wantonness against defendant City of Ozark; and plaintiff's claims against defendant Gregory Boutwell in his official capacity. (b) The motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice as to plaintiff's claims against defendan t City of Ozark in Counts I-IV and as to his claims against defendant City of Ozark for negligent supervision, training, and evaluation. (c) The motion to dismiss is denied as to plaintiff's state-law negligence claims against the defendant City of Ozark based on the doctrine of respondeat superior. (4) Defendant Ozark-Dale County E-911 Board, Inc.'s 16 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: (a) The motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice as to pla intiff's claims against defendant Ozark-Dale County E-911 Board in Counts I-V. (b) The motion to dismiss is denied as to plaintiff's state-law claims against defendant Ozark-Dale County E-911 Board for punitive damages or damages in excess of $ 100,000.00. No parties are dismissed or terminated. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/22/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRIAN LOMANACK, an
individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
GREGORY BOUTWELL, in his
official capacity as Fire
Chief for the City of
Ozark, Alabama and in his
individual capacity, et
al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:15cv122-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Defendant City of Ozark, Alabama’s objections
(doc. no. 41) are overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
recommendation (doc. no. 39) is adopted.
Judge's
(3) Defendant City of Ozark, Alabama’s motion to
dismiss (doc. no. 11) is granted in part and denied in
part, as follows:
(a)
The
motion
to
dismiss
is
granted
with
prejudice as to the plaintiff’s claims against unnamed,
fictitious
parties;
plaintiff’s
claims
for
punitive
damages and wantonness against defendant City of Ozark;
and
plaintiff’s
claims
against
defendant
Gregory
Boutwell in his official capacity.
(b) The motion to dismiss is granted without
prejudice as to plaintiff’s claims against defendant
City
of
Ozark
against
in
Counts
defendant
I-IV
City
of
and
as
Ozark
to
his
for
claims
negligent
supervision, training, and evaluation.
(c) The
plaintiff’s
defendant
motion
state-law
City
of
to
dismiss
negligence
Ozark
based
respondeat superior.
2
is
claims
on
the
denied
as
against
doctrine
to
the
of
(4) Defendant Ozark-Dale County E-911 Board, Inc.’s
motion to dismiss (doc. no. 16) is granted in part and
denied in part, as follows:
(a) The motion to dismiss is granted without
prejudice as to plaintiff’s claims against defendant
Ozark-Dale County E-911 Board in Counts I-V.
(b) The
motion
to
dismiss
is
denied
as
to
plaintiff’s state-law claims against defendant OzarkDale County E-911 Board for punitive damages or damages
in excess of $ 100,000.00.
No parties are dismissed or terminated.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is referred back to the United States
Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 22nd day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?